MORNING BEFORE Flashcards by Grace S | Brainscape

Q

Cafferkey v HMA

A

visible evidence does not need a warrant

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

A

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

HMA v Bell

A

warrant must be signed and identify premises

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

Hepper v HMA

A

can stumble across evidence without a warrant

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

Fraser v HMA

A

testify fact, not give opinion

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

Hopes v HMA

A

formal qualification not needed

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

HMA v Harris

W v HMA

A

reckless injury actus reus and mens rea

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

Normand v HMA

A

reckless endgangerment mens rea

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

Wade v Robertson

A

malicious mischief mens rea

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

HMA v WIlson

A

malicious mischief interference counts

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

Smith v Donnelly

A

breach of peace actus reus

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

Jones v Carnegie

A

breach of peace can eb private

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

McKay v HMA

A

cumulative doesnt count

fidelity

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

Hill v HMA

A

do not need to catch them in the act

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

Atkinson c HMA

A

assault can be fear

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

HMA v Igoe

A

assisting after a+p