Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Criminal Law and Evidence > Evidence cases > Flashcards

Evidence cases Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
MBE flashcards MPRE flashcards Civil Procedure 1L flashcards
1
Q

Hartkey v HMA

A

Special knowledge confessions are considered strong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Smith v Lees

A

must corroborate all crucial facts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Ralston v HMA

A

strong identification means no more strong corroboration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

AC v HMA

A

course of conduct needs only 2 corroborated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Yates v HMA

A

Distress provides corroboration if witnessed - can be specific

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

P v HMA

A

Distress - only within 24 hours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Wilson v HMA

2

A

Distress - occasionally outside 24 hours,

behaviour in interval does not matter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

MR v HMA

A

Moorov - definition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Howden v HMA

A

Howden doctrine meaning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

S v HMA

A

Gap should be 3.5 years moorov

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Ritchie v Morren

A

Prior misconduct allowed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Subramaniam v Prosecutor

A

Hearsay rule - evidence of what someone has said

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Cadder v HMA

A

right to legal access

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Brown v HMA

A

Confession inadmissible if unfairly obtained

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

HMA v Hawkins

A

must not be bullied into confession - test of fairness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Jamieson v Annan

A

Overheard between detained is allowed

17
Q

HMA v Graham

A

Police undercover cannot be used

18
Q

Cafferkey v HMA

A

If evdience is visible, no warrant

19
Q

HMA v Bell

A

warrant must be signed and identify premises

20
Q

Hepper v HMA

A

police can stumble over evidence

21
Q

HMA v McGuigan

A

allowed to search without warrant if emergency

22
Q

Fraser v HMA

A

Testufy fact not opinion

23
Q

Davie v Magistrates of Edinburgh

A

witness cannot give decision

24
Q

Hopes v HMA

A

Formal qual not needed, at least relevant experience

25
Q

Jones v HMA

A

Police involved in investigation can be impartial

Criminal Law and Evidence (5 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions