Moraro Flashcards
What is the traditional (standard) view of civil disobedience and punishment?
Civil disobedients should accept legal punishment as part of their respect for the legal system.
Why do some argue that civil disobedients must accept punishment?
It shows good faith, distinguishes civil disobedience from revolution, and helps persuade the public.
What is Moraro’s core claim about civil disobedience and punishment?
Civil disobedients are responsible (answerable) to society but are not necessarily liable to punishment.
How does Moraro distinguish between responsibility and liability?
Responsibility means answering for one’s actions, but it does not automatically mean one should be punished.
What duty does a civil disobedient have in response to breaking the law?
They must provide an explanation for their actions to their fellow citizens in court.
Why does Moraro emphasize the importance of trials for civil disobedients?
Trials allow them to justify their actions, demonstrating respect for the legal system without needing to accept punishment.
How does Moraro redefine political obligation?
Political obligation is based on respect for the law, not blind obedience.
When might breaking the law be an act of respect for the law?
When it upholds core democratic values, such as individual autonomy, against unjust laws.
Does a guilty verdict mean a civil disobedient must accept punishment?
No, they may have practical reasons to accept punishment, but they have no moral duty to do so.
Can racist protesters use Moraro’s argument to avoid punishment?
No, because racism contradicts the principle of equal autonomy, which underpins his argument.
Does punishing civil disobedients recognize their political message?
No, the state can acknowledge them through public trials without imposing punishment.
What is Moraro’s final stance on punishment for civil disobedience?
Civil disobedients owe an explanation but not necessarily punishment, as their disobedience can reinforce democratic values.
