Moral Development Flashcards

1
Q

What is morality?

A

An understanding of the difference between “right” and “wrong”

Intuition vs reason

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the theories of moral development?

A

Piaget’s theory

Kohlberg’s stages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is Piaget’s theory of moral development?

A

Moral realist vs moral subjectivist

Children made judgements about relative naughtiness of two boys
- good intentions but large damage
- bad intentions but small damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are moral realists?

A

Children below 7

Preoperational stage

Judgements based on scale of damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are moral subjectivists?

A

Children above 7

Concrete operational stage

Judgements based on the intention of the protagonist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the issues with Piaget’s theory?

A

What about cases where someone intentionally damaged property?

Is there a cognitive explanation?

Is moral development fully developed by age 7?

Is morality only based on understanding the difference between outcomes and intentions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are Kohlberg’s stages?

A

Level 1 = preconventional morality
- 1: punishment = wrong
- 2: reward = right

Level 2 = conventional morality
- 3: consider intentions
- 4: obedience to authority

Level 3 = postconventional morality
- 5: morally vs legally right
- 6: consider multiple views

Not everyone gets to stage 6

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is altruim?

A

Costly helping

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did Hamlin et al (2007) find about helping?

A

Watch video where either help or hinder

Experiment 1
- 6 and 10 month olds preferred helper over hinder

Experiment 2
- preferences disappeared when eyes of agent were removed

Experiment 3
- preference for helper and aversion to hinderer returned when compared to neutral condition
- helper vs neutral or hinderer vs neutral

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What did Warneken and Tomasello (2006) find about helping in toddlers?

A

Adult drop something and look if toddler picked up and gave it to the experimenter

18 month olds will help adult

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What do children think of helping?

A

Infants seem to understand others’ helping behaviours before they are able to help

Evaluate helpers more positively (by approaching helpers)

Engage in helping behaviours already by 18 months

Is this based on understanding morality?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What did Smith, Blake and Harris (2013) find about sharing?

A

Norms vs actions

3-8 year olds given 4 stickers

How many should you/another child share?
How many will you/another child share?

Many children up to 8 said sharing is something meant to do but in actuality, wouldn’t really share

As get older, do more sharing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What do children think of sharing?

A

Young children understand that it is “right” to share equally

Children don’t adhere to fairness principles until 7-8 years

Perhaps sharing is more costly than helping

Perhaps sharing requires more reasoned thought, whereas helping is based on intuition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What did Rhee and Waldman (2002) find out about genetic and environmental influences on antisocial behaviours?

A

Meta-analysis of twin and adoption studies aimed to tease apart the genetic and environmental influences on antisocial behaviour

32% variation due to genetic influence

43% variation due to environmental influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the environmental influences on antisocial behaviour?

A

Style of parenting - coercive cycles (Patterson et al, 1992)

Child attachment to parent

Peer group influences (Harris, 1995)

Watching TV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was the method of Eron’s (1987) study on the influence of watching TV on antisocial behaviour?

A

Longitudinal study

8 year olds followed up at age 19 and 30

Children reported
- their favourite TV shows/characters
- how lifelike they thought they were
- their own violent tendencies
- their classmates’ violent tendencies

17
Q

What were the results of Eron’s (1987) study on the influence of watching TV on antisocial behaviour?

A

Initial findings
- 8 year olds who stated that they liked violent TV programmes were rated by peers as being most aggressive
- most aggressive children rated violent programmes as being more lifelike

Longitudinal follow ups
- watching violent programmes at age 8 correlated with ratings of aggression at age 19
- watching violent programmes at age 8 correlated with various antisocial behaviours at age 30 (drink-driving offences, criminal convictions, domestic violence)

18
Q

What did Liebert and Barron (1972) find about the influence of watching TV on antisocial behaviours?

A

5-9 year olds either watched violent TV or similarly exciting sporting event

Then played without supervision

Those who watched violent TV were more aggressive and violent in their play

19
Q

What did Thomas et al (1977) find about the influence of watching TV on antisocial behaviours?

A

9 year olds watched either violent or non-violent TV

Then witnessed staged fight between 2 other children

Those who had watched violent TV responded less emotionally, suggesting they had been desensitised

20
Q

How might TV influence aggression?

A

Social learning theory (Bandura et al, 1962)

Imitation

Bobo doll study