Moral arguments for the existence of god Flashcards

1
Q

outline Owen’s argument

A

(P1) Morality consists of a set of commands.
(P2) For every command there is a commander.
(P3) Commands only carry as much authority as does their commander.
(P4) Morality carries ultimate authority.

Therefore:
(P5) The commander that commanded morality carries ultimate authority.
(P6) Only God carries ultimate authority.
Therefore:
(P7) The commander that commanded morality is God.
Therefore:
(C) God exists.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Owen’s quote on commands

A

“it is impossible to think of a command without also thinking of a commander”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is William Lane Craig’s formal moral argument?

A

(P1) If God does not exist, objective moral values do not exist.
(P2) Objective moral values do exist.
(C) Therefore, God exists.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

where is the flaw in Craig’s formal argument

A

he maintains that atheist cannot provide explanation for why murder and rape are wrong, but theists can point to the bible –> BUT no mention of rape prohibition in the bible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

outline Taylor’s argument from moral norms

A

analogy between legal and moral norms: a law is upheld by legal authorities, without whom legal code is meaningless –> only authority capable of upholding moral laws is god

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

name the 4 criticisms to the formal moral argument

A
  1. Is morality objective?
  2. False dichotomy
  3. Euthyphro’s dilemma - if things are good because god ordained them, moral argument falls apart because god isn’t necessary
  4. How do we come to know god’s objective laws?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Nietzche’s quote on morality

A

‘morality is the herd instinct of the individual’ –> we follow religion and morality to fit in, but this isn’t necessarily good

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

name the criticisms against Taylor’s argument

A
  1. Why judo-christian god?

2. Mill - obligation to uphold moral laws stems from our individual conscience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

mill’s quote on obligation to uphold moral laws

A

the individual conscience ‘does not originate in the will of a legislator or legislature external to the mind” –> moral laws unlike legal laws - we need to think of them as a psychological disposition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Schellenberg

A

the fact that God’s reality is not obvious is a problem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Fletcher’s view on conscience

A

we don’t actually have one - it’s just a word to describe our reasoning process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

John Henry Newman on conscience

A

argued for God’s existence based on conscience - since every human feels shame for wrongdoing, concludes that there must be some being ‘before whom such guilt is appropriate’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

st paul on conscience

A

suggested all humans have an inner witness to the law and conscience enables them to discern between right and wrong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what are the two postulates of practical reason

A

autonomy, god and the afterlife

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Gerald jones on kant

A

introduces a ‘moral carrot’ - deontological this with a teleological aspect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Brian davies on kant

A

kant’s argument in no way necessitates a JC god

17
Q

criticism of Kant based on fairness

A

what if the universe simply isn’t fair?

18
Q

out implies can and Kant

A

kant argues that us being obliged to aim for SB means it can be achieved; Brian Davies argues it is not irrational to aim for something which is not achievable