Monitoring for ER Flashcards
What is a monitoring plan? (4 points)
A plan describing the methods aimed at assessing your restoration objectives to see if your treatments are working
Developing sound plans will increase the proportion of successful projects and allows for assessing restoration need
Monitoring is the reason objectives must be specific and measurable
Monitoring plans must be closely related to restoration plans
Monitoring is often designed to assess whether restoration is improving a degraded site in terms of… (3 points)
Ecological value (ie. species composition, structure, or ecological function)
Increasing biodiversity
Human-based ecosystem services are an extra
Why are monitoring and objectives dynamic? (4 points)
Each of monitoring and objectives indicates when changes in the other are needed
Monitoring measures whether we have reached our objectives
But goals and objectives may change with more data collected
This in turn would change how we monitor
What is adaptive management? (2 points)
The iterative process of monitoring in the face of uncertainty that has the purpose of decreasing uncertainty over time by changing objectives to suit project as more information becomes available (data etc.)
Helps managers learn from restoration efforts in structured ways to enhance the effectiveness of restoration efforts long-term
What is the relationship between ecosystem traits and indicators in monitoring? (2 points)
We monitor objectives focused on the 6 specific indicators of ecosystem health (since traits can’t be measured)
The most common indicator monitored is diversity of native species because it’s cheap and easy to measure
What did Herrick et al. suggest when selecting indicators? (2 points)
They stated that monitoring should include plant composition indicators (diversity of natives or abundance of natives/non-natives) and at least one other indicator important to either/all of:
Soil and site stability
Hydrologic function
Biotic integrity
What general characteristics should indicators have for monitoring purposes? (3 points)
Indicators should be:
Easy to measure
Strongly linked to ecological health
Likely to be affected by restoration treatments
How do we gauge success of our restoration project? (3 points)
By monitoring, we can compare current indicator values with:
Control sites (unrestored degraded sites) to make sure the improvement wasn’t by chance
Reference sites (non-degraded sites) to see if treatments are improving conditions - bringing them closer to conditions before disturbance
Baseline data (which could be either data gathered in the site before the disturbance (uncommon) or data gathered in site after degradation but before restoration)
What is the goal of restoring a site in terms of gauging success?
Goal is to move towards reference site conditions and away from control site conditions
What is BACI design? (3 points)
Before and after control intervention
A method used to measure the impacts and success of restoration projects in ecology
Before-after restoration graph with reference or control sites documented
Why is choosing a good reference site important?
It is used to evaluate our progress towards our goals, so if it is not similar to our site, we won’t know if our treatments are working, if they need to be tweaked, or if restoration was successful
Why is selecting a good reference site challenging in practice? (3-points)
Different successional stages - reference may be in a different stage than our site. Project must define stage if this is the case
Natural range of variability - restoration project should compare multiple values of an indicator rather than just one to make sure it takes into account the natural range of variability of the indicator (eg. DO levels might vary throughout reach)
Finding truly unimpacted sites is difficult - important to document biases with categorizations
What can we do to minimize biases of using a reference site that might be in a different successional state as our site?
We can use multiple reference sites with varying successional stages to take into account the variability
What types of categories might we use to define our reference site if it has been impacted in some way? (5 points)
Reference condition for biological integrity (RCBI)
Historical conditions (HC)
Minimally disturbed condition (MDC)
Least disturbed condition (LDC)
Best attainable condition (BAC)
How can we avoid issues associated with selecting a good reference site? (3 points)
Establish control and reference sites as close to your site as possible
Have multiple reference sites if have different conditions (eg. Successional stages)
Use a reference condition from the literature instead