Module 8 (1&2) Flashcards

1
Q

What is Tort law? the purpose

A

The primary purpose of tort law is to provide remedies to individuals who have suffered harm due to the wrongful conduct of others

it shifts their damage on to the person who caused it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What latin term does the word tort come from

A

Tortum = twisted / crooked

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is Tort law meant to provide

A

Its meant to provide people with a legal recourse when non is available under private law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is a “Tort?”

A

a wrongful act
eg. someone punching you on purpose is a tort
eg. someone driving recklessly and hitting you is a tort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Who does tort law apply to?

A

everything and everyone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The plaintiff has to prove what?

A

that the defendant committed a tort on a Balance of Probabilities (more likely than not)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the difference of tort law and contract law

A

In tort law, duties are owed to people generally, not a specific individual as in the case of contract law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What differenciates tort law from criminal law?

A

1) They have different goals
Tort law has a private goal to compensate the harm of the plaintiff
Criminal law has the public goal to hold the defendant accoutablr for their crime

2) The state brings the case in criminal law, but for torts its the individual person

3) There is a different standard of proof: the balance of probabilites applies in torts vs no reasonable doubt standard in criminal law

4) consequences in tort is usually montary gain for plaintiff, in criminal law, the consequence is prison time (or fines)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the 3 goals of Tort Law?

A

Compensation

Deterrence (deter people from committing tort, so damages are for awarding good behaviour)

Psychological Comfort (to the injured)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the 3 typed of Torts

A

Intentional Torts (eg.battery)
Negligence
Strict liability torts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Torts are mostly always compensated in what form?

A

Money (damages) or an injunction (a court order to stop the defentant from what their doing)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the Damages based on? (5)

A

1) Dollar value of the actual loss
2) Cost of fixing the damage
3) Lost earnings (wages the victim lost from recovering from the tort)
4) Pain and suffering
5) Punative Damages (money damages awarded to punish the defendant rather than to compensate the plaintiff)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

In intentional torts, why doesnt the plaintiff have to show the actual damage?

A

Because proving that the interference happened is enough

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is Battery?

A

Direct and intentional harmful physical contact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

why is battery different then assault?

A

Assault is the threat of bodily harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

When is the element of “Direct” satisfied in battery?

A

If the immediate consequence of force impacts the defendant

17
Q

When is the element of “intentional” satisfied in battery?

A

When the defendant wants the result or knows the result was to occur
eg. pulling a chair from under someone knowing they will fall

18
Q

When is the Element of “Harmful and Offensive” satisfied in battery

A

When there is actual physical harm, or offensive
eg. being pushed in a crowd

19
Q

Consent must be ______ not by ________

A

Voluntary, force

20
Q

Explain the Malette v Shulman Case

A

The plaintiff carried a card stating that as a matter of religion she rejects blood transfusions
When she was in a life threatening situation, a doctor administered a blood transfusion that saved her life.
The court still found this as battery as it was intentional, and offensive