Module 7 - On Definitions Flashcards

1
Q

A (…) is a horse with a single tusk on its forehead

A

unicorn

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The word (…) means a horse with a single tusk on its forehead

A

‘unicorn’
*notice the ‘…’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

A (…) is a geometrical figure which is both a square and a circle

A

square-circle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The word (…) means geometrical figure which is both a square and a circle

A

‘square-circle’
*notice the ‘…’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

In a (…) definition, it is so to say a thing which is defined

A

real

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

In a (…) definition, it is a word or a linguistic expression which is defined; hence, such a definition is said to be (…)

A

nominal; nominal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

(…) and (…) are the two essential elements of a definition

A

Definiendum; definiens

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The linguistic expression ‘a horse with a single tusk on its forehead’ has (…) meaning but no (…) meaning

A

intentional; extensional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Similarly, the linguistic expression ‘a geometrical figure which is both a square and a circle’ has (…) meaning but no (…) meaning

A

intensional; extensional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

For a realist, it is (…) meaning, not (…) meaning, which culminates meaningfulness

A

extensional; intensional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Ordinary-language thinkers understand (…) meaning more easily than (…) meaning

A

intensional; extensional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Logical (critical) thinkers distinguish sharply between (…) versus (…) meaning

A

extensional; intensional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The word (…) is the supreme example of a word which lacks both (…) and (…) meanings but has a use as a term

A

‘nothing’; extensional; intensional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The French philosopher Rene Descartes is famous for his method of (… …)

A

methodic doubt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The philosophic problem of negative existensials must be deemed a stumbling block of both (…) and (…)

A

religion; science

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

With the problem of negative existensials unsolved, the atheist thesis that God does not exist cannot be proven True; accordingly (… …) has no motivation to solve the problem

A

ordinary religious

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

But the same problem unsolved makes it impossible from the great Saint (…) to deny the existence of Lucifer (the Devil) which is presumably part of what he wanted to deny in arguing the evil does not exist

A

Augustine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Vulcan does not exist, but even as this believed in (…), it cannot be proven True dues to the philosophic problem of negative existentials

A

mythology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

In (…), the problem of negative existentials has to be solved independently of both science and religion

A

philosophy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

A decisive solution to the problem of negative existentials would constitute a tremendous advance in pure (…)

A

philosophical analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

In a definition, the definiens is the meaning of the definiendum

A

TRUE

21
Q

Any definition is specifically intended to be persuasive

A

FALSE

22
Q

You are the extensional meaning of your name

A

TRUE

23
Q

You are the intensional meaning of your name

A

TRUE

24
Q

The scientific emphasizes the distinction between reality and fiction; the religious de-emphasizes such distinction

A

TRUE

25
Q

The typical religious would agree with Meinong and Wittgenstein

A

TRUE

26
Q

Any (supposed) subject of any sentence exists

A

FALSE

27
Q

Religion believes that both God and the Devil exist

A

TRUE

28
Q

Science believes that neither God nor the Devil exists

A

TRUE

29
Q

Like a typical religious, the otherwise excellent doubter Descartes believed both God and the Devil

A

TRUE

30
Q

Saint Augustine was correct in arguing that evil does not exist

A

FALSE

31
Q

Saint Augustine successfully solved the problem of evil, the heaviest problem of philosophy of religion, by denying the existence of evil

A

FALSE

32
Q

For the religion, suffering purifies the soul

A

TRUE

33
Q

Hence, for the religious, any person must be willing to suffer

A

TRUE

34
Q

Some people believe they can be happy by being ignorant

A

TRUE

35
Q

Science addresses the problem of pain (as an evil) by denying a la Augustine the existence of evil (which of course includes pain)

A

TRUE

36
Q

The definition ‘A unicorn is a horse with a single tusk on its forehead’ is a real definition

A

TRUE

37
Q

In contrast, the definition “The word ‘unicorn’ means a horse with a single tusk on its forehead” is a nominal definition

A

TRUE

38
Q

Unicorns are not real, i.e. unicorns do not exist

A

TRUE

39
Q

It is clearly correct to say ‘A unicorn is really a horse with a single tusk on its forehead’ following the so-called real definition of the definiendum ‘unicorn’

A

TRUE

40
Q

The word ‘unicorn’ extensionally means a horse with a single tusk on its forehead

A

TRUE

41
Q

The word ‘unicorn’ intensionally means the same as ‘horse with a single tusk on its forehead’

A

FALSE

42
Q

The word ‘nothing’ which is undeniably both extensionally and intensionally meaningless must be deemed incapable of any real definition

A

TRUE

43
Q

You can do ostensive definition of the term ‘nothing’

A

FALSE

44
Q

The word ‘nothing’ can be provided only a nominal definition

A

TRUE

45
Q

The previous exercise item comprises the point of Ockham why he says that non-existents can be given only nominal definition

A

TRUE

46
Q

The word ‘nothing’ means an x which is not itself (i.e. x≠x) or an x which does not exist [i.e. ~(∃y)(x=y)]

A

TRUE

47
Q

In symbolic logic, the word ‘nothing’ is signified by the denied existential quantifier

A

TRUE

48
Q

In symbolic logic, the expression ‘s is nothing’ is equivalent to either the expression ‘x is not itself’ (i.e. x≠x) or the expression ‘x does not exist’ [i.e. ~(∃y)(x=y)]

A

TRUE

49
Q

So finally, a nothing is a non-existent and a non-existent is a nothing

A

TRUE