Module 4 - Wittgenstein's Attack on the Referential Theory of Meaning Flashcards
(…) as meaning is merely secondary to (…) as meaning
Sense; referent
(…) was a philosophical movement which aimed to eliminate of all (…)
Positivism; metaphysics
Traditional metaphysical (…) are generally not found in the language (or discourse) of (…)
terms; science
The opposition between (…) and (…) is one of the outstanding dialects in philosophy
science; religion
The (…) theorists, in general, take the side of science in this dialectic
referential
Wittgenstein commenced his attack against the referential theory of meaning by presenting two erstwhile singular names (…) and (…)
Excalibur; Mr. N.N.
The weakness of Wittgenstein’s attack is that the two erstwhile singular names by which he commenced the attack against the referential theory of meaning are both of them in (…) failure
referential
The two alleged singular names (…) and (…) do not have respective (…) to start with
Excalibur; Mr. N.N.; referents
In his objectlevel attack against the referential theory of meaning, Wittgenstein confronts the reader with the problem of (…) reference to past objects
contemporaneous
In his metalevel attack against the referential theory of meaning, Wittgenstein confronts the reader with the alleged (… …) of alluding to (…) being broken to pieces and the alleged (… …) of alluding to (…) being dead
singular name; meaning; singular name; meaning
Sense (i.e. descriptive meaningfulness) of a linguistic expression is ultimately vacuous or empty unless there is something,, a referent object, which the linguistic expression describes
TRUE
Reference (i.e. referential meaningfulness) of an erstwhile singular name is not attained unless the alleged singular name has a referent object
TRUE
The term ‘flying horse’ has sense
FALSE
The term ‘flying horse’ has a referent
FALSE
An alleged name is ultimately not a name unless it has a definitive referent
TRUE