Module 5 - Driving Plan Sponsor Strategy With Reward and Compensation Systems Flashcards
Explain the potential impact of the compensation system on employers, employees, shareholders and society.
For an employer, the compensation system it chooses can help the organization achieve its business strategy and objectives; it can help attract, retain and motivate employees. The compensation system can also have moral and philosophical implications. Pay influences employees’ standard of living. Shareholders place importance on the financial value of the compensation system to the organization’s bottom line. Wider society tends to view compensation from an equity perspective, focusing on questions of justice. Compensation design can have a powerful effect on behaviour, but the employee behaviour desired is not always the behaviour obtained. A well-designed compensation system can have positive implications for organizations, employees and society, while a poorly designed compensation system can have undesirable consequences.
Identify potential problems an organization can face if it fails to choose an appropriate compensation system.
A compensation system is one of the most powerful tools available to an employer for shaping employee behaviour and influencing financial performance. An inappropriate compensation system can actually promote unproductive or counterproductive behaviour, leading to low employee motivation, poor job performance and high turnover. It can also create organizational rigidity, inability to adapt to change, lack of innovation, conflict between organizational units and poor customer service.
Contrast extrinsic and intrinsic rewards. Provide examples for each.
“Rewards” are anything provided by an organization that satisfies one or more of an employee’s needs. “Extrinsic rewards” satisfy basic needs for survival and security, social needs and needs for recognition. They are derived from the context of the job. Examples are financial returns (i.e., pay), supervisory and coworkers’ behaviours and general working conditions. “Intrinsic rewards” satisfy higher level needs for selfesteem, achievement, growth and development. They are derived from the content of the job—factors inherent in the job itself. Examples of intrinsic rewards are the amount of challenge a job provides, the degree of variety in a job and the extent to which it provides feedback and allows autonomy.
Differentiate between “rewards” and “incentives.”
Although the terms “reward” and “incentive” are often used interchangeably, they are not synonymous. Rewards are the positive consequences of performing behaviours an organization desires. Employees normally receive rewards either subsequent to performing the behaviour (in the case of extrinsic rewards) or during performance of the behaviour (in the case of intrinsic rewards).
An incentive is promise that a specified reward will be provided if the employee provides a specified behaviour. Incentives are offered to induce employees to perform behaviours they might not otherwise perform or to perform these behaviours at a higher level than they otherwise would.
Incentives are intended to induce valued behaviour, while rewards serve to recognize valued behaviour. These two concepts can merge over time, because if rewards are used consistently to recognize a desired behaviour, they can come to be seen as an implied promise for performing that behaviour in the future—in other words, as an incentive.
Differentiate between a “reward system” and a “compensation system,” and briefly outline the components of each.
A “reward system” is the mix of intrinsic and extrinsic rewards an organization provides to employees and includes components like career advancement opportunities, the intrinsic characteristics of the job, work/life balance, an employee recognition program, a positive workplace culture and compensation.
A “compensation system” is a subset of the reward system; it addresses the economic or monetary component of the reward system and has three components:
(1) Base pay
(2) Performance pay
(3) Indirect pay (Includes noncash items or services that satisfy specific employee needs, such as health protection (e.g., extended health care or dental care) or retirement security (e.g., pension plans).)
Identify the main goals of optimal reward and compensation systems, and indicate the significance of these goals.
Optimal reward and compensation systems are those that add the most value to an organization, after considering all their costs. An organization’s main goals for its reward and compensation systems are:
(a) Promoting achievement of organizational goals
(b) Fitting within the strategy for achieving its goals and supporting its structure for implementing that strategy
(c) Attracting and retaining qualified individuals who can perform the required task behaviours
(d) Promoting desired employee behaviour
(e) Being seen as equitable by all employees
(f) Complying with all relevant laws within the jurisdictions in which it operates
(g) Achieving organizational goals at a cost that is within its financial means
(h) Achieving organizational goals in the most cost-effective manner possible.
Identify factors considered in each step of developing an effective compensation system.
Step 1. Understanding the organization and the context in which it operates.
Step 2. Formulating the compensation strategy.
Step 3. Determining compensation values.
Step 4. Designing performance pay and indirect pay plans.
Step 5. Implementing, managing, evaluating and adapting the compensation system.
Explain the importance of ongoing evaluation and adaptation of a compensation system.
Ongoing evaluation determines whether the system is accomplishing its objectives and whether it is doing so in the most cost-effective manner possible. The evaluation process provides feedback that can be used to surface the nature of the issues and inform the nature of the changes needed (e.g., addressing a technical aspect of the system or a total redesign). A need for changing/redesigning the compensation system can be triggered by many things, including changes in the environment, within the organization or changes with technology.
Explain the concepts of vertical and horizontal “fit” and their significance in reward and compensation management.
“Fit” is an important concept in strategic management. It refers to the alignment of strategies at various levels in an organization. “Vertical fit” refers to the alignment between an organization’s mission (i.e., its reason for existence), vision (i.e., its desired future state) and values (i.e., principles, beliefs and attitudes that drive behaviour) and the various supportive strategies in the organization (e.g., human resource strategies support business strategies). “Horizontal fit” refers to the alignment between and among strategies at the same level (e.g., human resource strategies such as performance management and compensation are aligned with or support each other).
Describe the dynamics that underpin a “contingency approach to organizational design.”
For the organizational system to be effective, the business strategy and organizational structure must also fit with other key variables, including the type of environment in which the organization operates, the type of technology it uses, the size of the organization and the characteristics of the people employed. This is known as the “contingency approach to organizational design” and is the foundation for the strategic compensation framework presented in the text. Ultimately, the success or failure of any compensation system depends on how well it fits the organization’s context and its system as a whole. Therefore, to successfully design, manage and modify any compensation system, you must understand this context and how it links to the compensation system.
Rewards and compensation sit inside a larger set of structural variables, which are interrelated and must fit with one another. These are all in turn influenced by a set of contextual variables that are interrelated and must fit with one another as well. The link is managerial strategy. To be effective, the reward and compensation systems must fit with the other structural variables, as well as with the managerial strategy, which in turn must fit with the contextual variables.
Identify structural variables in an organization that interface with and impact reward and compensation systems.
Job design: Manner in which the total amount of work to be done in an organization is divided into subtasks that are assigned to individual employees
Coordination and departmentation: Methods used to coordinate the work of individual employees and subunits to ensure the work of individuals supports accomplishment of the overall task
Decision making and leadership: Mechanisms through which decisions are made and type of leadership role played by those in managerial positions
Communication and information: Methods used to communicate information and the amount and types of information communicated throughout the organization
Control structure: Means used to control employee behaviour and to ensure they are doing what they are supposed to do.
Explain the role of managerial strategy in a strategic compensation framework.
The structural variables can be arranged in a virtually limitless number of ways. However, over time, three main patterns of structural variables, known as “managerial strategies,” have emerged—classical, human relations and high-involvement. Each of these managerial strategies represents a particular combination of structural variables that has proven to be successful in the right circumstances. The particular managerial strategy used by a given organization is the single most important determinant of what will or will not be a successful compensation system for that organization.
Explain the factors that influence determination of the most appropriate managerial strategy for that organization.
Interaction between the goals and the general environment in which the organization operates determines the organization’s “domain.” The domain defines the specific products or services that the organization will offer and the task environment. The “task environment” is the specific slice of the general environment that is of particular relevance to the organization. Key elements of the task environment include customers or clients, competitors, suppliers and regulatory agencies.
Organizational goals “drive” the determination of the other contextual variables— business strategy, technology, organization size and nature of the workforce.
Explain how contextual variables affect reward and compensation decisions.
The key point about contextual variables is that a change in any of them may trigger a need for change in the reward and compensation systems. An organization that changes its business strategy, implements a new technology, grows in size, or experiences a change in its workforce may need a new reward and compensation strategy. An organization attempting to change its managerial strategy usually needs to change its compensation system. Failure to make the right changes in the reward and compensation systems, in light of other changes, may have dire consequences. Because organizations are systems, change in one aspect of the organization almost inevitably has implications for other parts of the organization.
Contrast the basic premises of the classical, human relations and high-involvement managerial strategies.
The classical managerial strategy assumes most employees inherently dislike work but can be induced to work in order to satisfy their economic needs. This approach assumes that the only way to get employees to work is to create circumstances where satisfaction of their economic needs becomes threatened if they don’t behave as the organization wants them to.
The human relations strategy assumes most employees inherently dislike work but can be induced to work in order to satisfy their social needs. This strategy is similar to the classical managerial strategy in the assumption that people inherently dislike work, but it differs in the belief that employees can be motivated by appealing to their social (vs. economic) needs. The human relations view tends toward paternalism—The organization is like a family.
The high-involvement managerial strategy assumes that work can be intrinsically motivating if an organization is structured properly. Employees are motivated by their needs for interesting work, challenge, autonomy, personal growth and professional development (vs. economic or social needs).