Module 4 Communications and Community relations Flashcards
Public Information Officer
Refers to the necessity and ability to communicate essential information to the airport and community stakeholders. Primarily concerned with building good relationships and enhancing the image of the airport
Air Service Development
Attempts to bring new or to grow existing, commercial air service to airports
Roles of Airport Executives
- Entrepreneur
- Public official
- Resource allocator
- Negotiator
- Figurehead
- Liaison
- Spokesperson
- Manager
- Cheerleader
- Information disseminator
Airport Executive as a tactical leader
Responsible for carrying out the strategic policy directions developed by the elected/appointed officials who comprise the airport board.
Inform/advise officials of status of the airport, makes recommendations and courses of action
Laws/regulations for grant assurances
Implements plans and manages policies
Airport director/manager
Usually appointed which means theyre usually on a contract and can be let go without cause
Serve @ the pleasure of the governing board
usually has greater flexability in the position at the expense of job security
Ways airport executives try to keep their jobs
registering a political affiliation of independant/undeclared or not making affiliation known
understanding their authority knowing when decisions must go before a sponsor especially with purchasing agreements, negotiations, signing leases, making personnel decisions
Remembering that when in public, theyre speaking on behalf of the airport and the officials
Authorities of an airport executive
- Agreements (Leases, use agreements, contracts)
- Purchasing (purchasing limits)
- Personnel (hiring and firing of staff)
- community relations
Resolution
- Written motion adopted by vote of the governing authority (Council, commissioners)
- Long term lease agreements, tenant leases, aeronautical use agreements, negotiations with air service providers, sale of property, selection of airport engineers
Consent agendas
a bundle of items that are voted on, without discussion, as a package. the agenda items dont need additional discussion and are only discussed if a board member, requests that an item be pulled off the consent agenda and be placed on a regular agenda.
Regular Agenda
Allows topics to be discussed in a public forum before the governing body votes on it
Public Discussion
- Only for the purpose of information gathering
- opportunity to explain things in more detail, receive public feedback and answer questions
Executive Session
- “closed meeting/session”
- litigation, discussion of employment contracts or other personnel issues
- Anything done or said is confidential
- to initiate, a governing member must make a motion and it has to be seconded @ which all non-governing members must leave
- Purpose to protect innocent people and talk SSI
Spokesperson
- need to know limits of information that can be given
- may not be from the airport so they have to bu up to date on all things airport
Station Managers Meeting
Opportunity for the airport director to pass along information, discuss issues, and build relationships
Government Policies (aka public policies)
- Guide decisions and actions that relate to society
- Public interest
- Will resources be utilized in an efficient manner
- fair policy
- equitable and reflective of values of the public
Guiding objectives for a public agency regarding citizen participation
- Establish/maintain legitimacy of ones agency, project, problem solving and decision making
- Establish/maintain the legitimacy of earlier decisions and assumptions
- Become familiar with all potentially affected interests
- Generate alternative solutions, articulate and clarify key issues
- Protect/enhance the credibility of the governing body
- Have all information needed in order to communicate various interests, and ensure its received and understood by them
- Receive/understand all information needed to communicate
- De-polarize interests who are polarized for some other reason
Intergovernment Relations
Focuses on following legislation at the federal, state or local level and in some cases, attempts to garner support for certain projects/programs. Prepares reports for the airport sponsor on the impacts of certain legislation or rule making on the airport and to make recommendations on courses of action
Governmental Affairs function
Focuses on attending regional and economical development planning meetings, developing positions papers on legislative and policy issues, representing the airport in regional forums with federal. state and local governmental officials and preparing talking points and presentations for board members
Attorney or Legislative Specialist
(A lobbyist) is helpful in providing insight into details of legislation to the government affairs function who may testify before legislative committees, representing the airport in formal/informal interactions with legislators and writing legislative amendments and resolutions in response to legislative developments
Airport executive skill set includes:
- airport ops, safety and security
- Snow removal
- ARFF/EMS
- Airport planning and design
- Construction
- Property mgmt
- law enforcement
- Air service development
- Pavement mx
- airfield lighting
- Utilities
- Legal related to mgmt/insurance
- Grant writing
- Bonds, airport finance, budgets and accounting
- Noise abatement
- land use development
- PR and marketing
- Environmental requirements and storm water mgmt
Airport legislative Alliance
Provides strong and effective representation for America’s airport system on capital hill. A go-to source for members of congress and capital hill staff seeking airport viewpoints on key issues
ALA provides 3 primary services:
(Airport Legislative Alliance)
- Airport Alerts
- Hearing reports
- Washington Insider update videos
Airport Alerts
Keep members up to date on the status of pending legislation
Hearing Reports
Provides insight into the various hearings that affect airport operations including TSA, FAA, and DHS testimony
Washington insider update videos
Deliver timely info and updates to airport executives who need to be in the know on industry related developments on capital hill and around Washington. Videos are filmed live from the AAAE studio and are sent on Mondays with an outlook for the coming week, in addition to further videos whenever events warrant
Transportation Security Team
Provides security policy alerts and notices which provide information to members on pending or existing TSA related actions or news. Also provide access to AAAE security smart brief, which is a free daily email providing the latest trending security news
Regulatory Alerts
Keep members up to date on FAA rule making actions and interpretations, along with the status of FAA /EPA programs that effect airport executives
Airport Regulatory Issues
Provide the status of hot button issues from a regulatory perspective (Such as SMS for airports, IROPS, and pandemic planning resources)
Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP)
- Part of vision 100-century of aviation re-authorization act
- Program oversight and governance are provided by representatives of airport operating agencies
- Features dozens of peer reviewed publications on numerous airport mgmt and operational issues
- Excellent source for well researched best practices
Why, “The airport was here first” isn’t a good reason
- Not always true
- Flight ops may have changed significantly since people have purchased homes
- Goes against principles of operating an airport in ACM which encourages airports to be good neighbors
- Changes in ATC due to Nextgen, many traditional flight paths are changing
Noise Abatement through grant assurances
A #5: Preserving rights and powers A #19: Ops and Mx A #21: Compatible Land use A #22: Economic nondiscrimination A #26: Reports and Inspections A #31: Disposal of Land
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
NEPA
Required an assessment of noise affects for airports undertaking major projects. Involved identifying the effect any proposed airport project had on noise levels in areas surrounding the project and developing a program of mitigation
Off Airport Land Use plans and controls
Well used planning schemes which include zoning. Local land use planning, building codes, subdivision regulations, private development initiatives, transfer of development rights, fair disclosure.
Zoning alone isn’t always effective
Aviation Noise Abatement Policy (ANAP)
- first clear identification of responsibilities of the FAA, air carriers, and local communities in dealing with noise exposure
- Promote positive efforts to attain compatible land use
- Airport operator is responsible for plan/implement design to reduce effect of noise on residents
- State/local government held responsible for providing compatible land use planning and development as well as zoning/housing regulations that limit use of land near airports
Under ANAP:
Aviation Noise Abatement Policy
- Airlines responsible for retirement, replacement or retrofit of old aircraft that didn’t meet federal noise level standards schedule and operate aircraft in a way that minimized impact of noise
- Travelers/Shippers are responsible for bearing cost of noise reduction through money paid to the aviation trust fund via passenger seat taxes on cargo
- Residents/prospective residents are responsible for investing in the noise program and taking steps to minimize effect. Prospective residents should be made aware of noise
FAR Part 36: Certificated airplane noise levels
Established noise certification standards for the design of turbojet and transport category aircraft. Purpose was to mandate change in design that would help to eliminate noise at its source. Centered on modification of engine design to provide higher air bypass ratios, thereby reducing noise from core engine
Effective perceived noise level (EPNL or EPNdB)
- Measurement requirements and limits for take off, sideline, and approach locations
- Aircraft engines are rated from a noise perspective in “stages”
Stage 1 aircraft
- Aircraft that have been shown to never meet any noise standards either because they have never been tested or because they’ve been tested and failed.
- Uncertificated helicopters either because they haven’t been tested for compliance or because they’ve been tested and failed to meet standards
Stage 2 aircraft
- Aircraft meet original noise limits set in 1969.
- Certificated Helicopters passed tests, however, there’s not direct 1 to 1 correlation between stage 2 aircraft and helicopter certification
Stage 3 aircraft
Aircraft meet more stringent limits established in 1977
Stage 4 aircraft
Noise limits are a cumulative 10 EPNdB less than those for stage 3
Airport Safety and Noise Abatement Act of 1979 (ASNA)
Provided a basis for a great majority of noise abatement planning at airports. Congress directed the FAA to develop and establish procedures for noise/land use compatibility programs for the nation’s airports
Resulted in Part 150: Airport land use compatibility planning
Part 150: Airport land use compatibility planning
govern the development and review of an integrated plan to achieve noise control objectives by encouraging compatible land uses in and around airports through the development of noise exposure maps and noise compatibility programs
voluntary in nature and is undertaken by community initiative
Part 150 evolved from:
- Airport noise control and land use compatibility (ANCLUC)
- DOD airport installation compatible land use zone (AICUZ)
Airport Noise and Capacity Act of 1990 (ANCA)
- US airports are prohibited from adopting overly restrictive or outright punitive anti noise ordinances
- Created part 161, noise and approval of airport noise and access restrictions and placed a cap on stage 2 aircraft allowed to operate in the US
- Requires airports to notify the FAA and all interested parties of adopting noise ordinances
Failure to comply with Part 150 or 161
Result in loss of AIP funds or PFC authorization
3 goals of ANCA
Airport Noise and Capacity Act
- Phase out noisier aircraft
- Place limits on local user restrictions and establish non restrictive noise abatement and land use actions
Airport/Airway Safety, capacity, noise improvement and intermodal transportation Act of 1992
Required the FAA to study social, economic, and health effects of airport noise at 65, 60, 55, 50 dB DNL (day night average level) noise areas to determine the actual level at which noise creates an adverse impact on population. Also to study the effects of single event noise on populations. Adopting 65 dB DNL standard, balance the protection of public health and welfare with competing economic and technological considerations
Attitudes that affect an individual’s reactions to noise include:
- Apprehension regarding the safety of the noise source
- The belief that noise is preventable
- Awareness non-noise environmental problems
- A general sensitivity to noise
- the perceived economic importance of the noise source
Decibel (dB)
a relative measure, or ratio, compared with a reference sound pressure. Range from 0-130. A logarithmic scale, meaning that sound pressure increases by powers of 10
Day/Night Average Level (DNL)
24 hour average sound level in A-weighted decibels from midnight to midnight obtained after the addition of 10dB to sound levels occurring between midnight to 7am, and 10pm to midnight
Integrated Noise Model (INM)
- Standard airport prediction model
- Valuates aircraft noise impacts in the vicinity of the airport
- Putputs include noise contours used in land use compatibility studies, noise impacts by aircraft on individual flight tracks and user defined point analysis
Does not depict actual measurements of noise being emitted
Aviation Environmental Design Tool (AEDT)
- Replaced the INM (Integrated noise model)
- models aircraft performance in space/time to estimated fuel consumption, emissions, noise, and air quality consequences
- can produce all noise dispersion metrics and flight tracks
dB levels unacceptable for inhabitation
75dB.
Compatible land use @ 65dB and below
Noise Integrated Routing System (NIRS)
Noise assessment program designed to provide an analysis of ATC changes over broad areas.
Replaced by Aviation environmental screening tool (AEDT 2a) in March 2012
Air traffic Noise Screening (ATNS)
Computer program that assists in determining whether a change in atc procedure for arrivals and departures between 3-10,000 AGL will generate a 5dB increase in noise to underlying communities and, therefore, is likely to be controversial
Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act of 1979 (ASNA)
- Principal law supporting federal efforts to identify and reduce noise issues involving land use around domestic civil airports
- Required FAA to establish, by regulation, 3 primary requirements that would simplify and standardize the process for carrying out noise compatibility planning/programs.
3 requirements of FAA by the ASNA
Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act of 1979
- Establish a single system of measuring noise at airports. Should contain a highly reliable relationship between projected noise exposure/surveyed reactions of people. Goal is to provide a system that can be uniform
- Establish a single measurement system for determining the exposure of individuals to noise from airport ops. It should include intensity, duration, frequency, and time of occurrence
- Identify compatible land uses given the level of noise exposure
1970 Airport and Airway Development Act
- 8% to noise compatibility planning/mitigation measures
- in 1987, increased to 10%
- Federal share for noise compatibility projects varies by airport classification. For med/large hub (As per AIP) it’s 80% allowable cost and 90% small/GA or non-hub
Part 150 Process
- implementation is optional
- Federal funding is available but the airport is required to base the program on FAA approved NEM and NCP
- Provides opportunity to secure required federal funding approvals for certain measures such as atc chances to reduce noise impacts
FAR Part 150
Establishes procedures, standards and methodologies used by airport operators for the preparation of NEM and NCPs
Phases to get approval
- Generate NEM which is then submitted to the FAA for approval
- Drafting of the NCP which is also submitted to the FAA for review
- Review period is 180 days followed by the implementation of the noise program
Noise Exposure Map
designed to clearly identify an airport’s past/present/future noise patterns and the land uses, which aren’t compatible with noise impacts. Standard reference for anyone proposing noise sensitive development in the vicinity. The ASNA prohibits the use of the NEM or related information as evidence or for other purposes in lawsuits/actions seeking damages from noise that the FAA’s accepted since the development of the NEM
Requirements for NEM
- Show unabated noise exposure as expressed in terms of yearly DNL for current/5th year
- Must show noise sensitive or incompatible land use
- Discussion of forecasted aviation activity
- Present in detail, the underlying assumptions upon which the noise contours are based
- any noise studies must be referenced and explained
- An analysis of ambient noise (sources other than aviation) a background community noise must be presented
Incompatible land use:
aviation vs. ambient noise
Incompatible land use affected by high levels of ambient noise dont have the same adverse standing as those with aircraft noise alone. This means a property owner would not be considered affected by airport noise if a nearby highway is generating noise levels at or above those generated by aircraft
Under the ASNA, approval of a NEM:
Aviation Safety and Noise abatement act
Theoretically imposes certain limits on the ability of people moving into an area affected by airport noise to recover damages from noise exposure. It precludes their ability to recover damages attributed to the airport noise if they had actual/constructive knowledge of the existence of NEMs
Significant change in noise exposure
- An increase in DNL of 1.5 dB if its above 65 dB
- In order for provision to be effective, person must have what’s legally known as constructive knowledge that an NEM exists
Constructive knowledge
Is presumed if notice of the existence of the NEM was published at least 3x in a local newspaper or if copies of the NEM were furnished to that person at the time of the property acquisition
Noise Compatibility Plan (NCP)
Involves a discussion and analysis of a number of noise abatement and land use mgmt measures that are .
specifically list in the part 150. They include land acquisition, easements, acoustical shielding, preferential RWY use, modified flight procedures, and airport operating restrictions
Provisions for noise abatement in the NCP
- Modification of flight procedures, regulations and the airfield itself
- Land use mgmt aimed at mitigating residential noise effects
- Property acquisition for buffer zones, urban redevelopment, noise easement and soundproofing
- Zoning and subdivision regulations
- Capital improvement policies
What does an approved NCP get you?
-Gives the airport eligibility for funding from the AIP noise set aside, of the airport and airway improvement program (AAIP). only items eligible in the approved NCP can be funded.
FAA order 5100.38, AIP handbook, identifies the eligibility requirements and allowable costs
Eligible items in the NCP
- Soundproofing
- property in fee or easement acquisition
- RWY/TWY extensions
- New RWY/TWY
Funding priority is given to projects in higher noise exposure areas (75 dnl or greater)
Conditions in which a part 150 study is appropriate
- Significant amounts of noise affected incopatible land use
- The receipt of serious noise complaints
- A threat from urban development pressure to increase incompatible land use near the airport
- The introduction of major changes in airport facilities or operations likely to shift or increase noise patterns
- The airport is interested in developing/enhancing its community relations program
Dual objective of part 150 approval
- Place substantial review responsibility/authority at the regional level. Regional offices are in direct contact with airports and have more knowledge of local land/noise situations
- Retain enough oversight review and decision making authority at the national level to ensure overall consistency of the FAA’s part 150 determinations
Standards and criteria of a part 150 study
- Fair/objective, including measures that are reasonably consistent with achieving the goals of reducing existing, incompatible land use and preventing the introduction of additional non-compatible land use
- NCP shouldn’t degrade safety, adversely affect the safety and efficient use of airspace, nor adversely affect any other powers and responsibilities of the FAA
Information contained in the part 150 plan
- Copy of noise exposure map and supporting documentation
- Categorization of parties responsible for implementation
- Development of NCP that meets part 150 standards
- Actual/anticipated effect of program on reducing noise exposure
- description of how the recommendations may change previously adopted actions
- schedule for implementation of the program
- Costs of the program implementation and anticipated sources of funding
- Provision for revising the program if necessary
Information contained in part 150 plan (continued)
-A description of public participation and the consultation process used during the programs development, including a summary of comments at any public hearing on the program and a copy of all written material submitted to the airport operator,together with the airport operators response and disposition of comments to demonstrate that the program is feasible and reasonably consistent with obtaining the objectives of airport noise compatibility planning under part 150
FAA approval under part 150 requires the airport to have alternatives:
- Reduction of noise at the source
- relocation of the source in either space or time
- acoustical changes to the area of noise exposure
FAA regional makes recommendations on each measure presented in a part 150 study:
- based on a thorough review by all applicable FAA regional program areas (Airports, atc, flight standards)
- recommendations are subjected to concurrence at the national level by the FAA administrator for airports, the associate administration for policy and international aviation, and chief counsel
- Final decisions are recorded in federal register
Compatibility measures must meet 5 objectives:
- achieve the goal of reducing non-compatible land uses around the airport
- Not derogate safety or adversely affect the safe and efficient use of airspace
- Not unjustly discriminate against an airport user
- Not create undue burden on interstate/foreign commerce
- Not adversely affect other powers and responsibilities of the FAA administrator as prescribed by law
Options for mitigating noise under Part 150:
- acquisition of land and interests therein, including air rights, easements and development rights, to ensure the use of property for purposes which are compatible with airport operations
- Soundproofing
- use of take off/landing procedures by FAA, including modification of flight tracks, to abate noise through the operational control of aircraft over noise sensitive areas
- implementation of a preferential RWY use system by the FAA
- Noise barriers, such as the construction of barriers and acoustical shielding, including the soundproofing of public and residential buildings
- Engine run up and ground operation provisions
- Flight procedures
- off airport land use plans/controls
- noise monitoring systems
- other administration measures and studies
- installation of new navaids
- airport use restrictions
Airpot use restrictions may include, but aren’t limited to:
- Denial of the use of the airport to aircraft types that don’t meet federal noise standards
- Capacity limitations based on relative noisiness of different types of aircraft (A noise budget)
- Use of noise abatement take off or approach procedures approved as safe by the FAA
- Complete or partial curfews (Night time limitations)
- differential landing fees based on FAA certificated or estimated noise emission levels or on time of day annoyance
Land Acquisition
-most effective control measure for reducing noise
-must be reasonably consistent with achieving goals of reducing existing non-compatible land uses around the airport and preventing the introduction of additional non compatible land use
-Acquiring an air navigation easement is considered to be the same as having interest in land
-renders a property compatible because the answer
has granted the airport the legal right to allow
aircraft to make noise over the property