Module 4 - Classical Theories of Persuasion Flashcards
They believed in persuading by making the weaker argument stronger
Sophists
Focused on style and presentation at the expense of the truth
Sophists
Criticized sophists for using rhetoric for personal gain than greater good.
Plato
Sees rhetoric as a tool to educate, and not please, an audience
Plato
Three classical schools of rhetoric
Sophistical optimism
Aristotle’s Realism
Platonian Skepticism
Defined rhetoric as the faculty of observing in any given case the available means of persuasion
Aristotle
Three Branches of Rhetoric according to Aristotle
Deliberative, Judicial, and Epideictic
The speech or writing attempts to get an audience to take or not to take an action.
- Future Oriented
Legislative/Deliberative Rhetoric
Deals with determining an accusation or charge as just or unjust.
-Whether an action in the past is good or bad and how we can deal with it in the present
Forensic/Judicial Rhetoric
Deals with praising or blaming persons or entities in order to celebrate, mourn, or purge guilt
Usually in obituaries, crisis statements, letters of recommendation, etc.
Epideictic/Ceremonial Rhetoric
Aristotle’s 3 Means of Rhetoric
Ethos, Pathos, and Logos
Is the ethical appeal/credibility of the speaker.
Relies on establishing the speaker’s authority, expertise, and integrity
Ethos
Appeals to the audience’s emotions aiming to evoke feelings such as sympathy, empathy, joy, etc.
Creating connections by the audience’s emotions
Pathos
Refers to logical appeal. The use of reasoning and evidence to support an argument.
Emphasis on the rational basis of your arguments.
Logos