Module 3.2 Flashcards
Stock Valuation Methods
The Price-Earnings (PE) Method applies the mean price-earnings (PE) ratio based on expected earnings of all traded competitors to the firm’s expected earnings for the next year
Valuation = Expected earnings per share x Mean industry PE ratio
Assumes future earnings are an important determinant of a firm’s value.
Assumes that the growth in earnings in future years will be similar to that of the industry
There are many different methods of valuing stocks
Fundamental analysis relies on fundamental financial characteristics (such as earnings)
of the firm and its corresponding industry that are expected to influence stock values.
Technical analysis relies on stock price trends to determine stock values. Our focus is
on fundamental analysis. Investors who rely on fundamental analysis commonly use the
price–earnings method, the dividend discount model, or the free cash flow model to
value stocks. Each of these methods is described in turn.
Consider a firm that is expected to generate earnings of $3 per share next year. If the mean ratio of share price to expected earnings of competitors in the same industry is 15, then the valuation of the firm’s shares is
Valuation per Share =Expected Earnings of Firm Price per share x Mean industry P/E ratio
$3X$15=$45
Price-Earnings Method
Reasons for Different Valuations
Investors may use different forecasts for the firm’s earnings or the mean industry earnings over the next year.
Investors disagree on the proper measure of earnings.
Limitations of the PE Method
May result in an inaccurate valuation of a firm if errors are made in forecasting the firm’s future earnings or in choosing the industry composite used to derive the PE ratio.
Dividend Discount Model
where t = period
D t = dividend in period t
k = discount rate
(See Formula)
Relationship with PE Ratio for Valuing & Limitations of the Dividend Discount Model
Relationship with PE Ratio for Valuing
The PE multiple is influenced by the required rate of return and the expected growth rate of competitors.
The inverse relationship between rate of return and value exists in both models.
The positive relationship between required rate of return and value exists in both models.
Limitations of the Dividend Discount Model
Errors can be made in determining the dividend to be paid, the growth rate, and the required rate of return.
Errors are more pronounced for firms that retain most of their earnings.
Adjusted Dividend Discount Model
Adjusted Dividend Discount Model
The dividend discount model can be adapted to assess the value of any firm, even those that retain most or all of their earnings.
The value of the stock is equal to the present value of the future dividends plus the present value of the forecasted.
Limitations of the Adjusted Dividend Discount Model
May be inaccurate if errors are made in:
deriving the present value of dividends over the investment horizon or
the present value of the forecasted price at which the stock can be sold at the end of the investment horizon.
Adjusted Dividend Discount Model, Breakdown
Adjusted Dividend Discount Model
Constant dividend
The firm will pay a constant dividend forever
This is like preferred stock
The price is computed using the perpetuity formula
Constant dividend growth
The firm will increase the dividend by a constant percent every period
The price is computed using the growing perpetuity model
Supernormal growth
Dividend growth is not consistent initially, but settles down to constant growth eventually
The price is computed using a multistage model
Zero Growth
If dividends are expected at regular intervals forever, then this is a perpetuity and the present value of expected future dividends can be found using the perpetuity formula
P0 = D / R
Suppose stock is expected to pay a $0.50 dividend every quarter and the required return is 10% with quarterly compounding. What is the price?
P0 = .50 / (.1 / 4) = $20
Constant dividend growth
Dividends are expected to grow at a constant percent per period.
P0 = D1 /(1+R) + D2 /(1+R)2 + D3 /(1+R)3 + …
P0 = D0(1+g)/(1+R) + D0(1+g)2/(1+R)2 + D0(1+g)3/(1+R)3 + …
With a little algebra and some series work, this reduces to:
(See slide)
Constant dividend growth example 1
Suppose Big D, Inc., just paid a dividend of $0.50 per share.
It is expected to increase its dividend by 2% per year.
If the market requires a return of 15% on assets of this risk, how much should the stock be selling for?
P0 = .50(1+.02) / (.15 - .02) = $3.92
Constant dividend growth example 2
Suppose TB Pirates, Inc., is expected to pay a $2 dividend in one year.
If the dividend is expected to grow at 5% per year and the required return is 20%, what is the price?
P0 = 2 / (.2 - .05) = $13.33
Why isn’t the $2 in the numerator multiplied by (1.05) in this example?
Nonconstant Growth
Suppose a firm is expected to increase dividends by 20% in one year and by 15% in two years.
After that, dividends will increase at a rate of 5% per year indefinitely.
If the last dividend was $1 and the required return is 20%, what is the price of the stock?
Remember that we have to find the PV of all expected future dividends.
Nonconstant Growth (cont)
Compute the dividends until growth levels off
D1 = 1(1.2) = $1.20
D2 = 1.20(1.15) = $1.38
D3 = 1.38(1.05) = $1.449
Find the expected future price
P2 = D3 / (R – g) = 1.449 / (.2 - .05) = 9.66
Find the present value of the expected future cash flows
P0 = 1.20 / (1.2) + (1.38 + 9.66) / (1.2)2 = 8.67
Point out that P2 is the value, at year 2, of all expected dividends year 3 on.
The final step is exactly the same as the 2-period example at the beginning of the chapter. We can look at it as if we buy the stock today and receive the $1.20 dividend in 1 year, receive the $1.38 dividend in 2 years and then immediately sell it for $9.66.
Calculator: CF0 = 0; C01 = 1.20; F01 = 1; C02 = 11.04; F02 = 1; NPV; I = 20; CPT NPV = 8.67
Free Cash Flow Model
For firms that do not pay dividends:
Estimate the free cash flows that will result from operations.
Subtract existing liabilities to determine the value of the firm.
Divide the value of the firm by the number of shares to derive a value per share.
Limitations — Difficulty of obtaining an accurate estimate of free cash flow per period.
Capital Asset Pricing Model
Sometimes used to estimate the required rate of return for any firm with publicly traded stock.
The only important risk of a firm is systematic risk.
Suggests that the return of a stock (Rj) is influenced by the prevailing risk-free rate (Rf), the market return (Rm), and the beta (Bj): Rj = Rf + Bj(Rm – Rf)where Bj is measured as the covariance between Rj and Rm, which reflects the asset’s sensitivity to general stock market movements.
Capital Asset Pricing Model (Cont.)
Estimating the Market Risk Premium
The yield on newly issued Treasury bonds is commonly used as a proxy for the risk-free rate.
The term, (Rm – Rf), is the market risk premium: the return of the market in excess of the risk-free rate.
Historical data for 30 or more years can be used to determine the average market risk premium over time.
Estimating the Firm’s Beta — Typically measured by applying regression analysis to determine the sensitivity of the asset’s return to the market return based on monthly or quarterly data.
Calculate Required Rate
The beta of the stock for Vaxon, Inc., is estimated as 1.2 according to the regression analysis just explained. The prevailing risk-free rate is 6 percent, and the market risk premium is estimated to be 7 percent based on historical data. A stock’s risk premium is computed as the market risk premium multiplied by the stock’s beta, so Vaxon stock’s risk premium (above the risk-free rate) is 0.07 × 1.2 ¼ 8.4 percent. Therefore, the required rate of return on Vaxon stock is
R=6%+1.2(7%)=14.4/5
Capital Asset Pricing Model (Cont.)
Application of the CAPM
Given the risk-free rate as well as estimates of the firm’s beta and the market risk premium, it is possible to estimate the required rate of return from investing in the firm’s stock.
At any given time, the required rates of return estimated by the CAPM will vary across stocks because of differences in their risk premiums, which are due to differences in their systematic risk (as measured by beta). Historical data for 30 or more years can be used to determine the average market risk premium over time.