Module 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Individual healthcare

A
  • Clinicians generally deal with individuals
  • Aim to treat disease and restore health
  • Reactive form of treatment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Population healthcare

A
  • Health of a group of individuals in the context of their environment
  • The social and physical environment of people
  • Comprehensive & proactive approach to clinical practice
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

PHF - defintion

structure - DPIRPFDTPSAWAME

A

Public Health Framework: provide mass benefit for the largest number of people at the same time to reduce inequities in the distribution of health & wellbeing.

Define the problem -> Identify risk and protective factors -> Develop and test preventative strategies -> Assure widespread adoption -> Monitor and evaluate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Bradford Hill Criteria

TaBS CRaBS

A
Temporality
Biological gradient 
Strength of association 
Consistency of association
Reversibility 
Biological plausibility 
Specificity of association
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Temporality

A

timeline will be given

  • Sequence of events: Cause must precede disease.
  • Essential to establish a causal relationship
    e. g. Smoking -> lung cancer deaths
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q
  1. Strength of association -
A

will mention strength

  • The stronger an association, the more likely to be causal in absence of known biases (selection, information & confounding)
    e. g. British doc study: RR>10
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Consistency of association

A
  • diff groups
  • Replicating findings w/ different investigators, times, places, methods
    e. g. Multiple studies showing similar results
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Biological gradient

A
  • Incremental change in disease rates in conjunction with corresponding changes in exposure
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Biological plausibility of association

A
  • Association making biological sense

e. g Chemicals in tobacco are known to promote cancers (carcinogens)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Specificity of association

A

(weakest criteria)
A cause -> single effect or effect has a single cause. But, health issues have multiple/interacting causes & many outcomes share causes.
E.g. smoking -> multiple outcomes. Multiple causes -> lung cancer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Reversibility

A

The demonstration that under controlled conditions changing the exposure causes a change in the outcome => likely causal relationship. e.g. reduced risk after quitting smoking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Definition of the cause of disease

A

event/condition/characteristic (or combination) which play an essential role in producing the disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Causal pie - KJ Rothman

A

Sufficient cause, component cause and necessary cause

  • Use the association and other factors to infer causation and intervene to prevent disease
  • Can intervene at any number of points in the pie
  • No prerequisite knowledge of the complete pathway needed to introduce preventive measures.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Sufficient cause

A
  • The whole pie
  • A minimum set of conditions without any one of which the disease would not occur
  • Often several
  • The disease may have several sufficient causes (several pies => same disease)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Component cause

A
  • A factor that contributes towards dis-ease causation, but not sufficient to cause dis-ease by itself
  • Component causes “interact” to produce disease
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Necessary cause

A
  • A factor that must be present if a specific dis-ease is to occur
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Pop based (mass) strategy purpose

A
  • Focuses on the whole pop & aims to reduce health risks/ improve outcomes of pop. useful for a common disease or widespread cause
  • e.g.: Immunisation programmes, legislation of seatbelts, low salt foods at supermarkets
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Pop based (mass) strategy advantages

A
  • Radical - addresses underlying causes
  • Large potential benefit for whole population
  • Behaviourally appropriate (change societal norms)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Pop based (mass) strategy disadvantages

A
  • Small benefit to individuals
  • Poor motivation of individuals
  • Whole population is exposed to downside of strategy (less favourable benefit-to-risk ratio)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

High-risk individual strategy purpose

A
  • Focuses on high risk individuals
  • Well matched to individuals and their concerns
  • e.g.: Intervention targeting obese adults, intravenous drug users
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

High-risk individual strategy advantages

A
  • Appropriate to individuals
  • Individual motivation
  • Cost effective use of resources - Favourable benefit-to-risk ratio
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

High-risk individual strategy disadvantages

A
  • Cost of screening, need to identify individuals
  • Temporary effect
  • Limited potential
  • Behaviourally inappropriate (Unchanged societal norms)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Health promotion

A

Acts on determinants of wellbeing in pop. & enables/empowers people to increase control over/improve, their health. Usually pre-disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Primary healthcare declaration- Alma Ata 1978

A
  • Protect and promote health of all
  • Advocated a health promotion approach to primary care
  • 1st time social determinants were recognised as being key to good health for individuals in a pop
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Prerequisites for health

A
Peace and safety from violence, 
Shelter,  
Education, 
Food, 
Income and economic support, 
Stable ecosystem and sustainable resources, 
Social justice and equity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Ottawa charter aim

A

Aim to mobilise action for community development.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Ottawa charter acknowledgement

A

health is:

  • A fundamental right for everybody (human rights in health)
  • Requires both individual and collective responsibility (includes government)
  • Opportunity to have good health should be equally available (equity lens). Government has to focus on the prerequisites of health. Incorporate health into the policies.
  • Good health is an essential element of social and economic development
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Ottawa charter basic strategies

A

Enable, Advocate, Mediate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Ottawa charter Enable

A

(Individual level strategy) To provide opportunities for all individuals to make healthy choices through access to information, life skills and supportive environments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Ottawa charter Advocate

A

(System-level strategy) To create favourable political/economic/social/cultural/ physical environments by promoting/advocating for health & focusing on achieving equity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Ottawa charter Mediate

A

(Individual, group & system strategy) To facilitate/ bring together individuals/groups/ parties with opposing interests to work together/come to a compromise for the promotion of health

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Ottawa charter strands

A

Develop personal skills
Strengthen community action
Create supportive environments
Reorient health services towards primary health care

Build healthy public policy

33
Q

Ottawa charter - Develop personal skills

A

Increases the options available to people to exercise more control over their own health and make choices
conducive to health (through individual empowerment, providing information and education for health, and enhancing life skills)

34
Q

Ottawa charter - Strengthen community action

A

Community empowerment: ownership and control of their own endeavours and destinies and their ability
to prioritize health interventions & issues relevant to them.

35
Q

Ottawa charter - Create supportive environments

A

Develop the built environment to promote healthy lifestyles, and conserve natural resources.

36
Q

Ottawa charter - Reorientate health services towards primary health care

A

Healthcare must be responsive to needs of patients and families (their culture, aspirations, capacities, resources & social norms). Includes a health promotion angle as well as being curative. Requires strong attention to health research.

37
Q

Ottawa charter - Build healthy public policy

A

Placing health in the agenda of policymakers in all sectors- policy must reflect the changing needs of
communities and individuals. Coordinated action to create policies that foster equity.

38
Q

Ottawa charter issues

A
  • Based on Western models, universal formula (one size fits all)
  • Often simply adapted for Māori, doesn’t incorporate Māori values and realities. Tended to benefit non-Māori to a greater extent than Māori
  • Superficial vs structural approach
39
Q

Te Pae Mahutonga

A

Based on the Southern Cross as a navigational aid. Fundamental components of health promotion from a Māori world view – “but as they might also apply to other New Zealanders”

40
Q

Te Pae Mahutonga - Prerequisites

A

Ngā Manukura and Te Mana Whakahaere

41
Q

Te Pae Mahutonga - Key tasks

A

Mauriora, Toiora, Waiora, Te Oranga

42
Q

Ngā Manukura

A

(leadership) Health professional & community leadership. Enabling/empowering communities to do things for themselves

43
Q

Te Mana Whakahaere

A

(autonomy): Capacity for self governance (make decisions for themselves). Community control & enabling political environment

44
Q

Mauriora

A

Access to Te Ao Māori. “Maori world” Cultural identity, language, customs, marae.

45
Q

Toiora

A

Environmental protection. Physical enviro are key determinants to health. Bad air/water => unhealthy

46
Q

Waiora

A

Healthy lifestyles. Diets, exercise, no smoking/alcohol

47
Q

Te Oranga

A

Participation in society. “Social determinants of health”. Ensuring there is resources to practice Mauriora, Toiora & Waiora. Education, income, good housing. Broader implications: Political, participation individually/collectively in political processes/decisions.

48
Q

Te Pae Mahutonga Principles

A
  • By Māori for Māori (for everyone)
  • Self determination and control
  • Valid models, frameworks, concepts
  • Māori people, values, collectives
  • Contemporary tools and methods
  • Allows for diverse realities
  • Focus on determinants of health
  • Evidence-based
49
Q

Disease prevention

A

Ways of preventing disease/consequences.

50
Q

Primary Disease prevention

A

Acts before disease, aims to limit incidence

51
Q

Secondary Disease prevention

A

Acts at early stages, aims to reduce more serious consequences

52
Q

Tertiary Disease prevention

A

Acts after diagnosis, aims to reduce the progress of more serious consequences

53
Q

Health protection

A

Predominantly environmental hazard focused. Risk/Hazard assessment e.g. Environmental epidemiology,
Safe air and water, biosecurity. Occupational health & Monitoring e.g. safety regulations on work sites biomarkers of exposure to hazardous substances. Risk communication: relating environmental risks to the public e.g flags at beach => drowning risk

54
Q

Screening

A

A special type of prevention strategy

Identifying risk factors for disease/unrecognised disease by applying tests on a large scale to a population

55
Q

Objective screening initiative

A

To improve health outcome (morbidity, mortality and/or disability)

56
Q

Screening criteria

A

Suitable disease, Suitable test, Suitable treatment

57
Q

Screening criteria: Suitable disease

A
  • Relatively common
  • Relatively uncommon: Early detection/ intervention -> better outcome
  • Knowledge of the natural history of the disease (or relationship of risk factors to the condition)
  • Detectable early (detectable risk factor/disease marker)
  • Increased duration of pre-clinical phase
58
Q

Screening criteria: Suitable test

A
  • Reliable – provides consistent results
  • Safe
  • Simple
  • Affordable
  • Acceptable
  • Accuracy: the ability of a test to indicate which individuals do/do not have the disease. 2 measures: Sensitivity & Specificity. Fixed characteristics. (Both remain the same despite where test is applied)
59
Q

Screening criteria: Suitable treatment

A
  • Evidence of early treatment leading to better outcomes
  • Effective, acceptable and accessible treatment
  • Evidence-based policies covering who should be offered treatment and the appropriate treatment to be offered
60
Q

Screening criteria: Suitable screening programme

A
  • Benefits must outweigh harm
  • RCT evidence that screening programme will result in:
  • Reduced Mortality
  • Increased Survival time: Lead time bias & Length time bias
61
Q

Sensitivity

A

Likelihood of a positive test in those with the disease.
- Increase sensitivity => increase proportion of true positives

Sensitivity = a/(a+c) = # true positives/total # with disease x100%

62
Q

Specificity

A

Likelihood of a negative test in those without the disease.
- Increase specificity => increase proportion of true negatives

Specificity = d/(b+d) = # true negatives/total # without disease x100%

63
Q

PPV

A

The proportion who really have the disease of all people who test positive

PPV = a/(a+b) = # true positives/# who test positive

64
Q

NPV

A

The proportion who are actually free of the disease of all people who test negative

NPV = d/(c+d) = # true negatives/# who test negative.

65
Q

If the prevalence is moderate/low means?

A

higher false positive test results

66
Q

If the prevalence is high means?

A

higher false negative test results

67
Q

Prioritising: Descriptive

A
Problem: Where are we now? 
Who is most/least affected?
What are the trends over time?
- Where have we come from? 
- Where are we going?
68
Q

Prioritising: Explanatory

A

What are the determinants? What are the risks?
Why are we getting worse/better?
Why are populations different?

69
Q

Prioritising: Equity

A
  • Does the problem/risk factor disproportionately affect population sub groups? Why?
  • Be mindful of obligations to the Treaty of Waitangi
70
Q

Prioritising: Evaluative

A

What can improve health outcomes (and in whom)?
How well can the problem be solved?
- Target population
– Expected # in population who will be reached
– Evidence of effectiveness (based on known success rates)
– Cost

71
Q

Prioritising: Economic feasibility

A
  • Does it make economic sense to address the problem?

- Are there economic consequences if not carried out?

72
Q

Prioritising: Opportunity cost

A

The health benefits that could have been achieved had the money been spent on the next best alternative intervention or healthcare programme

73
Q

Prioritising: COMMUNITY EXPECTATIONS & VALUES. PUBLIC ATTITUDES. HUMAN RIGHTS & SOCIAL JUSTICE

A
  • community expectations & values - public attitudes considered: If not considered => ineffective preventative measures
  • human rights & social justice: Treaty of Waitangi
74
Q

Prioritising: Acceptability

A
  • Will the community and/or target population accept the problem being addressed?
  • Competing interests
75
Q

Prioritising: What do communities want?

A
- Confidence in the health system 
– Access to necessary care 
– Fair treatment 
– Culturally appropriate 
– Good information about their options
76
Q

EPIDEMIOLOGICAL MEASURES

A
  • Death age/premature mortality-Years of potential Life Lost (YLL)
  • Time lived with disability - Years Lived with a Disability (YLD)
  • Population Attributable Risk (PAR)
77
Q

Attributable risk

A

RD = AR = EGO - CGO

  • The amount of “extra” disease attributable to a particular risk factor in the exposed group
  • Incidence in exposed population (EGO)
  • For High risk interventions, we target the risk factor w/ greatest AR.
78
Q

Population attributable risk

A

PAR

  • The amount of “extra” disease attributable to a particular risk factor in a particular population
  • If the association is causal – this is the amount of disease (theoretically) we could prevent if that particular risk factor is removed from the pop
  • Pop based interventions: target the risk factor which has the greatest PAR as this will benefit the most people.
  • If prevalence is high then the PAR is high

Incidence in total pop - Incidence in unexposed pop
PGO - CGO
(a+b)/P - b/CG