Module 15 Flashcards
This was established in a US Supreme Court decided case.
Doctrine of the Fruit of the Poisonous Tree
Other term for The doctrine of the fruit of the poisonous tree
Exclusionary Evidence
Under the Exclusionary rule known as the fruit of the poisonous tree,
once the primary source is shown to have been unlawfully obtained, any secondary or derivative evidence derived from it is also inadmissible (People vs. Alicando, 251 SCRA 293; People vs. Sequino, 264 SCRA 79).
the right to remain silent; the right to have competent and independent counsel preferably of his own choice and the right to be informed of these rights (People vs. Logronio, 214 SCRA 519; People vs. Duero, 104 SCRA 379).
The Miranda Doctrine
actual taking of a person into custody by an authority in order that he or she may be bound to answer for the commission of an offense.
Arrest
is an order in writing issued in the name of the People of the Philippines, signed by a judge directed to a peace officer, commanding him to arrest the person designated and take him into custody of the law in order that he may be bound to answer for the commission of an offense.
Warrant of Arrest
refers to the warrant of arrest issued by a judge to the peace officer after returning the original warrant of arrest after the lapse of the 10-day validity period.
Alias Warrant
As provided in its general rule, it is a requisite that warrant should be issued in
The name of the person to be arrested
Any peace officer who arrests a person without warrant may be liable under
Article 125 of the revised penal code
What rule provides the exception to the general rule mentioned above
Rule 113 Section 5, Rules of Court
Best method of restraint
Handcuffs
act of examining documents, papers and effects.
Search
another order in writing issued in the name of the People of the Philippines, signed by the judge and directed to a peace officer commanding him to search for personal property and bring it before the court.
Search warrant
If an officer effected the search without warrant, he may be liable of
Article 128 of the Revised Penal Code (Violation of Domicile)
Whatever evidence obtained in the process of warrantless search is
not admissible as evidence in court for it is considered as “fruit of the poisonous tree