Module 11: Other Employer-Sponsored Plans Flashcards
Explain why employers provide supplementary executive/employee retirement arrangements (SERPs).
SERPs contribute to attracting and retaining executive and highly skilled employees. A SERP is a flexible tool that can provide more or less generous pensions on bases that differ from those normally used in a registered pension plan (RPP). For executives hired at mid-career for whom the RPP can provide only a relatively small benefit, a SERP can be designed to compensate for short service, subject to Canada Revenue Agency guidelines.
Where the market for talented executives is competitive, a supplementary retirement arrangement can be an important element of the total compensation package.
Describe two approaches to eligibility used in supplementary retirement arrangements.
In top-up plans, enrollment is automatic as soon as any employee’s registered pension plan entitlement is restricted by the ITA maximum.
In selected enrollment arrangements, the criteria to determine who participates in selected enrollment plans vary widely (e.g., chief executive officer (CEO) only, automatically for all selected officers, at board discretion for selected officers, all employees above a certain position or all employees above a certain salary).
Outline special criteria that may influence how SERP provisions are structured to meet the needs of employees in senior positions and outline the SERP provisions that may be included in order to meet those criteria.
SERP provisions may be structured to:
(a) Provide an attractive retirement income for executives hired in mid-career, or to make up for pension credits forfeited as a result of leaving prior employment; and,
(b) Help retain key executives as they approach retirement age.
Special SERP provisions may include:
(a) An accrual rate higher than 2%
(b) Additional service credits
(c) A pension benefit formula based on a flat percentage of final average earnings (i.e., 60%), irrespective of service or after a specified number of years of service such as 15 or 20 years
(d) In a defined contribution SERP, an employer contribution schedule that increases as the employee’s service period increases.
Outline the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) disclosure requirements for named executive officers (NEOs).
Under CSA disclosure requirements, publicly traded companies are required to disclose the compensation of named executive officers (NEOs). The NEOs include the chief executive officer (CEO), the chief financial officer (CFO) and the three other most highly paid executives whose total compensation exceeds $150,000. The required Statement of Executive Compensation (a summary table of compensation) must include a “pension value,” including the “compensatory value” of benefits provided to each NEO under all registered and nonregistered defined benefit (DB) pension plans and defined contribution (DC) pension plans.
Benefits provided under DB and DC plans are to be disclosed in separate retirement plan benefit tables. Details to be reported for DB pension plans include the number of years of credited service, the annual benefits payable assuming retirement at the end of the most recent financial year and at the age of 65, the accrued obligation at the start of the plan year, the accrued obligation at the end of the plan year, and the breakdown in the change in the accrued value during the plan year between compensatory and noncompensatory amounts must be shown for each NEO.
Details to be reported for DC pension plans include accumulated values at the start and end of the year as well as the compensatory and noncompensatory changes in value that occurred during the year.
Explain an employer’s considerations when deciding whether employees will be required to contribute to a funded Retirement Compensation Arrangement (RCA)
Almost all supplementary employee retirement plans are noncontributory. For those that are contributory, most use the same contribution formulas as are contained in the underlying RPP. Plans that are contributory will almost always be funded SERPs, characterized for tax purposes as Retirement Compensation Arrangements (RCAs).
In order for employee contributions to a funded RCA to be tax-deductible, the contributions must be mandatory and must not exceed the amount of employer contributions made to the plan in respect of that employee. Nondeductible contributions can still be made to the RCA, and the payment of benefits at retirement will not be taxed until the total amount of employee contributions has been paid out.
Describe the key characteristics of a retiring allowance and reasons why they may be paid.
A retiring allowance is an amount received upon or after retirement from an office or employment, in recognition of long service or in respect of loss of office or employment. It is usually paid as a single sum, but it can also be paid out in a limited series of installments.
Retiring allowances are used mostly as severance payments to long-service terminated employees, or as “sweeteners” to induce long-service employees to accept an early retirement offer. To the extent that tax relief is available, it makes sense to use a retiring allowance at the time of an employee’s planned retirement.
Identify the limits under the Income Tax rules on retirement allowance amounts that can be transferred to RPPs or RRSPs.
A retiring allowance must be included in the recipient’s income in the year received, but there is provision for income tax to be deferred if transferred to a registered pension plan (RPP) or a Registered Retirement Savings Plan (RRSP). The amount that can be transferred to these vehicles is limited to:
(a) $2,000 times the number of years (including partial years) before 1996 during which the employee was employed by the employer or a related employer, plus
(b) An additional $1,500 for each year of service (including partial years) prior to 1989 in respect of which employer contributions to an RPP or a deferred profit- sharing plan (DPSP) had not vested in the employee.
As time passes, the tax relief available in respect of service before 1996 is becoming less relevant.
Outline the reasons for funding and not funding a supplementary retirement arrangement.
The tax relief that makes funding RPPs attractive is not available when assets are set aside to fund the benefits promised under a supplementary retirement arrangement. Therefore, historically, few supplementary retirement arrangements have been funded. Where supplementary retirement arrangements are not funded, the pension benefits are paid as they fall due out of the company’s current revenues (i.e., on a pay-as-you-go basis).
The lack of funding can be a source of concern to employees who expect to receive supplementary pensions. There is a risk that the financial health of the employer will deteriorate, rendering the employer unable to pay. On the other hand, some companies feel that funding executive pensions is inappropriate (the logic being that executives should not be protected from the implications of company failure). Depending on the reasons the supplementary retirement arrangement was put in place, a company might consider the supplementary pension to be part of incentives for active employees rather than as a provision for the employee’s retirement security in the future.
Explain the main advantage of funding a supplemental plan by using an RCA.
The main advantage of funding through an RCA is that it provides security to participating employees, since the assets in the RCA are typically separate from company assets (transferred to a trustee or held in trust by the employer) and are therefore protected from the employer’s creditors.
Describe specific arrangements that the Income Tax Act excludes from the definition of an RCA.
Specific arrangements that the Income Tax Act excludes from the definition of an RCA include:
(a) RPPs, salary deferral arrangements (SDAs) and plans that are dealt with under other provisions of ITA, such as DPSPs, employee’s profit-sharing plans (EPSPs), RRSPs, tax-free savings accounts (TFSAs), employee trusts and certain health, disability and unemployment benefit plans as well as certain foreign service plans for nonresidents
(b) Plans established for the purpose of deferring the salary of a professional athlete
(c) Life insurance premiums and insurance policies (except in instances where a life insurance policy can be deemed to be an RCA)
(d) Certain “prescribed plans or arrangements” under ITA regulations.
Describe a letter of credit and explain how it can be used to provide security for an RCA.
After the funded RCA, the most common mechanism to provide security for a supplementary pension arrangement is an RCA that holds a letter of credit. Although the letter of credit is not an immediate source of funding, it can provide a form of security in circumstances such as bankruptcy, change of control or failure of the employer to pay SERP benefits.
A letter of credit is an irrevocable promise by a financial institution, usually a bank, to pay a specified amount if certain conditions unfold, such as the failure to pay a pension benefit. Normally, the term of a letter of credit is one year. If an employer sponsoring a SERP fulfills their commitment and pays the employee the agreed-upon pension, the most recent letter of credit will be allowed to expire. For purposes of securing a long-term obligation such as pension income, successive letters of credit are put in place, each of which becomes payable for the benefit of the RCA trust if the employer fails to provide the next letter of credit.
The annual premium (fee) paid to the bank by the employer for the letter of credit is analogous to an insurance premium for coverage that facilitates payment of these benefits (with the fee reflecting the amount needed to secure the unfunded accrued pension promise to employees).
Generally, the employer will establish an RCA and will contribute twice the fee charged by the financial institution issuing the letter of credit, and 50% of the contributions are paid to the Receiver General. This contribution is made on an annual basis as letters of credits are put in place. The RCA uses the contributions to purchase the letter of credit from the financial institution. As there is no property held in the RCA, other than the letter of credit, there are no earnings inside the RCA subject to the refundable 50% tax.
Benefits would be paid out to the employee on a pay-as-you-go basis, and the letter of credit is called upon only where the employer fails to make the payments or some other specified event occurs that triggers the letter of credit. If the employer does not fulfill their commitment, the RCA trust must obtain monies from the LOC in order to pay the pension. At that time, upon request of the appointed trustees of the RCA, the lending institution advances the face amount of the letter of credit to fund the benefits and thereby becomes a creditor of the employer. The trust must remit 50% of the face value of the LOC to CRA as a refundable tax payment, and the balance is available to the trust. Then, at time of retirement, the 50% refundable tax is recouped and the trust pays the agreed-upon benefit to the employee.
Explain the implications of the special deeming rules under ITA that apply when an employer acquires an interest in a life insurance policy with the intent to use that policy to fund retirement benefits.
As a result of special deeming rules under ITA, when an employer acquires an interest in a life insurance policy that may be reasonably considered to have been acquired with the intent to fund retirement benefits, RCA rules apply.
These special deeming rules are:
(a) The employer that purchased the policy is deemed to be the custodian of the RCA
(b) The policy is deemed to be the property of the RCA
(c) Twice the amount of any premium paid in respect of the policy is deemed to be a contribution to the RCA and is subject to the 50% refundable tax
(d) A repayment of a policy loan is considered to be a contribution to the RCA
(e) Any payments received pursuant to the policy, including policy loans, are treated as distributions from the RCA and will trigger the 50% tax refund.
Describe a secular trust.
A secular trust is an arrangement whereby the employer pays to the employee additional salary on the condition that the employee will in turn establish a trust to hold the additional amounts. The employee is the beneficiary of the trust. To ensure the funds are used to provide retirement income, the employee agrees that the trust will contain terms that constrain the timing and amount of income the employee can withdraw from the trust. The capital used to establish the secular trust is taxable income to the employee and, as a result, a gross-up may be required to offset the taxes paid. The employee pays tax on the income of the trust so such trusts do not defer tax. The employer can normally obtain a deduction for the additional salary paid. A secular trust can be tax effective if the top marginal tax rate is less than the 50% rate applicable to RCAs, since under the current tax regime, capital gains and dividends enjoy a tax rate below 50%.
Explain why an employer might establish a profit-sharing plan.
Profit-sharing plans are designed to reward good performance and to instill a sense of partnership between the employer and each participating employee. An employer would expect the plan to lead to increased productivity and increased profit. The intention is to establish a common interest for employees, management and shareholders.
Outline the types of non-pension profit-sharing plans operating in Canada.
Non-pension profit-sharing plans can be established to provide immediate or deferred benefits.
Immediate benefits can be provided through a cash profit-sharing plan, while non-pension plans that provide deferred benefits include:
(a) Deferred profit-sharing plans (DPSPs)
(b) Employee’s profit-sharing plans (EPSPs).