Module 10 - NCRMD Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Draw structure of Canadian court system

A

See notes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Aboriginal courts

A
  • Overrepresentation (3% vs 18%)
  • Why? Access to legal representation, commit crime with higher incarceration punishments, differential effect due to poverty
  • Solution: Bill C-41 (particular considerations), Gladue reports (background info), restorative justice (community safety, accountability, skills development)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Sentencing purposes

A
  • General and specific deterrence
  • Denounce unlawful conduct
  • Separate offenders from society
  • Rehabilitation
  • Reparations
  • Promote sense of responsibility and acknowledgement of harm to victim/society
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Sentencing principles

A
  • Proportionate to offense (seriousness of crime) and responsibility of offender (age)
  • Aggravating/mitigating circumstances such as hate crime, domestic abuse, abused position of trust, organized crime
  • Similar sentencing for similar crimes
  • Combined sentence should not be unduly harsh
  • Avoid imprisonment if other appropriate sanctions (consider for all offenders)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Sentencing options

A
  • Absolute/conditional discharge (probation success = clean record)
  • Suspended sentence: like conditional but you end up with criminal record, no actual consequence
  • Restitution
  • Fines/community service: 2nd most common
  • Conditional sentence: served in community, most common i.e., probation
    o Intensive supervision probation: strict curfews + electronic monitoring
  • Imprisonment: intermittent option, -2 years = provincial, 2+ years = federal
  • Dangerous offenders: indefinite, repeat offenders with long-term offender status
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Disparities in sentencing

A
  • Systemic disparities: consistent such as offense leniency, differences in personality/philosophy/experience, between judges
  • Non-systemic disparities: inconsistent such as changes in mood/irrelevant stimuli/interpretations, within same judge (extra-legal)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Offender treatment (RNR)

A
  • Risk principle: target high risk of reoffending
  • Need principle: effective if targeting criminogenic needs such as antisocial attitudes/peers/personality factors or substance abuse (not more than 3 rehab services at once)
  • Responsivity principle: match general learning styles and abilities of offender + consider specific factors (ethnicity, culture, sensitivity, self-esteem)
  • Most effective method to rehabilitate offenders
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Parole types

A
  • Temporary absence: 1st type of release granted
  • Day parole: treatment programs
  • Full parole
  • Statutory parole: after 2/3 of sentence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Decision-making

A
  • Eligibility for parole after 1/3 or 7 years of sentence
  • Factors to consider: risk of reoffending, criminal history, social problems/relationships/employment, psychological reports/professional opinions, institutional behavior, info from victim, evidence of change, treatment benefits, performance on earlier release
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Dr. Serin’s structured procedure framework

A
  • Decisions = equitable, transparent, defensible
  • Key elements = domains regarding release decisions (release plan), issue with domains (protective factors), scoring mechanisms (aggravating, mitigating or no impact)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Fitness

A
  • Present competence at trial, no admission necessary, no plea, pause on proceedings
  • Stems from right to fair trial
  • Proposed by defense or prosecution
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

NCRMD

A
  • Time of offense (mens rea), admit guilt, plea, final adjudication
  • Agreement of prosecution and defense
  • 0.09% of cases with only 20% successful
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Psychiatrist

A

medical doctors, determine fitness but psychologists can assist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Psychologist

A

clinical have PhDs and may conduct fitness evaluations in US

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Assessing fitness

A
  • Review documentation
  • Interview (assess malingering)
  • Ask please available + definition
  • Ask about their role, lawyer/judge’s role
  • One piece of data isn’t enough (multiple measurements required)
  • MMPI, FIT-R, Wechsler adult intelligence test
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Malingering

A
  • Act more dramatically
  • Mix together strong symptoms
  • Evasive about details
  • Inconsistencies in symptoms
  • Openly discuss symptoms
17
Q

Outcomes of unfit

A
  • Civil commitment = hospital but no crime
  • 90 days then reexamination
  • Focus on restoring fitness (educating + counselling)
18
Q

Legal insanity requirements

A
  • Suffering from mental disorder or disease
  • Did not understand nature and quality of act
  • Not know actions were wrong
19
Q

Procedure in assessing NCRMD

A
  • Confirm referral
  • Review documents: school evaluation, previous psychiatric behavior, substance use, arrests
  • Contact 3rd parties: parents, teachers, friends, witnesses, arresting officers
  • Interview defendant (no confidentiality)
  • Conduct testing: MMPI
  • Write report: judge assesses
20
Q

Outcomes NCRMD

A
  • Absolute
  • Conditional discharge
  • Psychiatric hospitalization: generally held indefinitely, then conditional discharge
  • Considerations = public safety, mental state of defendant, reintegration of defendant, other needs of defendant
21
Q

Fitness requirements

A
  • Cannot understand proceedings: basic understanding of adversarial court system, nature of charges, roles of judicial actors
  • Can’t effectively communicate with counsel
  • Cannot understand consequences: understand that they’ve been charges, what the verdicts could be
  • (Only need 1 and it must be due to mental disorder/intellectual impairment)