Module 1 Flashcards

1
Q

Types of cases Art 3 judges can hear

A

interpretation + disputes
must be case or controversy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What determines whether there is a “case or controversy”?

A

-Whether it’s an advisory opinion
-If its moot/ripe
-Standing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what do you need for pre-enforcement review

A

fit for judicial decision + substantial hardship for plaintiff if not decided

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

mootness exceptions

A

-capable of repeating itself and evading review due to the inherently short nature of the event/issue
-class action where class rep claim becomes moot but another can bring in class
-defendant voluntarily stops the conduct but can restart at any time [strip club]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

taxpayer/citizen standing exceptions

A

-ur own tax bill
-10th Am [feds impinging on state law arena; must be redressable injury]
-Establishment Clause [must be CONGRESSIONAL spending]
-overbreadth 1st Am
-enforce fed statutes (if within zone of interest)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

rule on 3d party standing

A

-generally none
-unless difficult for 3d party to assert own rights or close relationship exists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

org standing

A

Can sue on behalf of its members if:
–injury in fact to members
–members injury is related to orgs purpose AND
–individual member participation in lawsuit not required (e.g., not seeking indiviidualized damages)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

sovereign immunity exceptions

A

-express waiver [consent]
-structural waiver
-local gov actions
-suit by other states or feds
-bankruptcy
-some actions against state officers
-cong removes immunity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

adequate and independent state grounds doctrine

A

If a state court deci
sion
rests on two grounds, one that’s state law and one
that’s federal law, and if the Supreme Court’s reversal of
the federal law ground will not change the result in the case, then
the Supreme Court can’t hear the case. [4th am example]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

congress powers

A

Art. 1 Sec 8 enumerated powers plus powers necessary and proper to carry out enumerated powers
Enum powerS: to lay and collect taxes; pay debts and borrow money; regulate commerce; coin money; establish post offices; protect patents and copyrights; establish lower courts; declare war; and raise and support an Army and Navy.

NO FEDERAL POLICE POWER

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

TAXING AND SPENDING POWER

A

General rule: can tax and spend for any public purpose not prohibited by Const.

Spending power conditions:
Can impose strings on grant of money to local or state govs if: (1) clearly stated; (2) relate to purpose of program; (3) are not unduly coercive; and (4) do not otherwise violate the Const.

Taxes generally invalid. Must bear some rational relationship to gov production or promting the general welfare. Cannot simply PENALIZE to COMPEL.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what can regulate under commerce power

A

channels, instrumentalities (planes, traints, auto; people, things); OR activities w substantial effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

intrastate activity

A

if COMMERCIAL and in aggregate has substantial effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

delegation of leg power

A

-can do as long as intelligble standards are set and power not specifically confined to congress
-major questions doctrine exception
–look to whether agency has historically asserted such power and whether there is clear congressional auth for the claimed power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

inherent/implied exec powers

A

-when p acts w express or implied auth from Congress, pres auth at MAX and actions likely valid
-when p acts where Cong silent, const is uncertain, courts will consider circ and relevant history. unlikely to be upheld if it usurps power of another branch.
-if p acts against express will of Cong and Cong had auth to act, action likely invalid.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

when can’t the president grant pardons

A

-non-federal offenses
-those for impeachment or civil contempt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

how to override a veto

A

2/3 of both chambers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Treaty power

A

-pres + 2/3 of Senate
-supreme law of land if self-executing (effective w/o any implementation by Cong.). State laws that conflict generally invalid.
-when conflicts w fed law; last in time prevails

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

exec agrmts

A

-signed by pres and head of foreign country
-do not require consent of senate
-prevails over state law.
-federal law prevails over

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

federal taxation of states or local govs

A

must apply to both state and private entities generally to be valid (like minimum wage laws)
-can invalidate under 10th if not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

intergovernmental immunity doctrine

A

states cannot interfere with or

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Preemption/Supremacy Clause stuff

A

Start with presumption against preemption.
-express preemption (narrowly construed)
-implied preemption
—conflict by the way state and fed law req
—state prevents achievement of federal objective [frustrates]
—field preemption [even if nonconflicting – fed laws must be so comprehensive]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Art IV Privileges and Immunities

A

-prohibits discrim against nonresidents concerning COMMERCIAL activities (like pursuit of livelihood) or FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS [not corps]
-applies only if intentionally protectionist
-strict scrutiny

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

14th Am P or I

A

right to petition Congress for redress of grievances, the right to vote for federal officers, and the right to interstate travel

25
Q

dormant Commerce clause

A

-in the absence of Congress regulation, can do so but must not discriminate or unduly burden
-state or local regs that discrim against interstate commerce to protect local econ interests are almost always invalid
-may be upheld if passes SS tho

if NONDISCRIM [treats local and out-of-state interests alike], use balancing test : VALID unless burden outweighs promotion of legit local interest

diff standard for state control of corporations/incorporation [generally upheld]

26
Q

Dormant commerce clause exceptiions

A

-Congressional approval (but not if violates Const.)
-when the state is a “market participant” (seller or buyer of goods, like when awarding construction kx)
-when involves traditional gov functions (like waste disposal) - more lenient standard

27
Q

general powers of states to tax commerce [for discrim]

A

-Congress has complete power to authorize or forbid state taxation that affects interstate commerce.
-Unless auth by Cong., state taxes that discrim against interstate commerce violate CC

28
Q

nondiscriminatory taxes on interstate commerce

A

will be held as VALID if:
-tax has substantial nexus to the taxing state [exists when a business avails itself of the privilege of doing business in the state. phys presence not necessary]
-fairly apportioned according to a rational formula
-fairly related to the services or benefits provided by the state

29
Q

ad valorem property taxes

A

tax on assessed value of some prop

Commodities: Valid only if property is no longer in interstate commerce.
Instrumentalities: Valid if instrumentality has “taxable situs” in state and tax is fairly apportioned. Full tax by domiciliary state valid unless taxpayer can prove a defined part has acquired taxable situs elsewhere.

30
Q

USE TAXES

A

-tax on goods purchased outside of state but used within
-valid unless higher than sales tax

31
Q

privilege, license, franchise, occupational tax

A

tax placed on some activity like doing business

Valid if (i) substantial nexus to taxing state, (ii) fairly apportioned, (iii) does not discriminate against interstate commerce, and (iv) fairly relates to services provided by the state.

32
Q

Sec 5 if 14th Am

A

Congressional enforcement power. Can adopt appropriate legislation to enforce the rights and guarantees of the 14th Am. Cannot expand existing con rights or create new ones - can only enact laws to prevent or remedy violations of rights already recognized by the Courts. to adopt a valid law, Cong must point to history or pattern of state violation and adopt leg that is CONGRUENT AND PROPORTIONAL to solving the identified violation. [can enforce DP, EP, citizenship rights through Sec 5]

33
Q

due process mens rea requirement

A

mere negligence insufficient. must be intentional or reckless gov action.

34
Q

dp liberty definition

A

gov deprivation of SIGNIFICANT FREEDOM OF ACTION or FREEDOM PROVIDED BY CONST OR STATUTE.

does not include mere injury to rep

35
Q

dp definition property

A

personal and real prop (whether tangible or intangible) but also gov benefits to which there is an ENTITLEMENT (a reasonable expectation of continued receipt) under state or fed law.
An abstract need or desire for a benefit is not enough.
includes welfare benefits, pub edu, gov licenses, and tenured gov employment or term employment for duration of the term, but NOT ATWILL

36
Q

dp owed for welfare benefits

A

prior notice and prior evidentiary hearing

37
Q

dp owed for public employment (tenured or termination for cause)

A

generally, prior notice and opp to respond, and subsequent evidentiary hearing

38
Q

dp owed for termination of parental custody

A

prior notice and prior evid hearing. clear and convincing evid req.

39
Q

publlic edu disciplinary suspension or academic dismissal dp

A

prior notice and opp to respond; no formal evid hearing req

40
Q

general DP requirements

A

notice [reasonably calc. to inform person]
opp to be heard [balancing]
neutral decisionmaker

41
Q

balancing test to determine hearing type

A

WEIGHS:
-importance of interest to individual AND
-value of specific PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS to that interest (i.e., the risk of ERROR from current procedures used and benefits of addtl proceudres) AGAINST
-gov interest in fiscal and admin efficiency

typically should be given pre-deprivation hearing unless this would be impracticable

42
Q

dp neutral decisionmaker req

A

no ACTUAL bias (like financial interest or relative party to case)
no SERIOUS RISK of actual bias

43
Q

test for determining whether right is fundamental for SDP

A

whether it is deeply rooted in the nation’s history of tradition and essential to the concept of ordered liberty

44
Q

2d Am test

A

regulation must be consistent w the country’s historical tradition of firearm regulation
pay close attention to history when 2d and 14th Ams adopted

45
Q

when can states discriminate against aliens

A

voting, jury service, elective office
some non-elective offices involving important pub policy (like popo, probation, primary and secondary school teachers)

46
Q

when could a law fall under RB

A

racial animus (not rational)

47
Q

general law on takings

A

must be for PUBLIC use and must provide JUST compensation
includes easements, personal prop, intangibles (but not welfare benefits)
physical or regulatory

48
Q

physical taking law

A

confiscation of person’s prop OR permanent or regular phys occupation of personal prop

49
Q

temporary occupations

A

Consider factors like degree of invasion, the duration, the government’s intention, the foreseeability of the result, the character of the property, and the interference with the use of the property

TWO EXCEPTIONS: development + emergency

50
Q

development exception

A

Municipalities often attempt to condition building or development permits on a landowner’s (1) conveying title to part of the property to the government (for example, to be used as streets), or (2) granting the public an easement to access the property.
These conditions constitute a taking unless (1) the government can show there is an essential nexus between the condition and the proposed development (that is, the condition relates to a legitimate government interest) and (2) the adverse impact of the proposed development is roughly proportional to the loss caused to the property owner from the forced transfer.

51
Q

regulatory takings

A

TAKING IF denial of all econ value of land [unless nuisance applies]

Temporary denial of all econ use not per se taking. Will weigh: planner’s good faith, reasonable investment-backed expectations, delay length, delay’s actuall effect, etc. to determine whether “fairness and justice” req just compensation

Decreasing econ value - use balancing test
-Generally, regs that merely decrease the prop value (such as by prohibiitng the most beneficial use) do not constitute a taking. But consider:
-gov interests
-dimunition in value to owner
-whether reg substantially interferes w distinct, investment-backed expectations of owner

52
Q

KX Clause

A

-Private kx - must subtantially impair existing private kx -(use intermed. scrutiny)
-public kx (SS)

53
Q

ex post facto laws

A

crim. can’t do where makes someone criminal after or imposes greater punishment or reduces evidence re

54
Q

Free Exercise Clause

A

prohibits government from punishing someone on the basis of their religious belief or related religious status or conduct

gov can consider sincerity but not truthfulness of belief

doesnt require religious exemptions. but can grant
EXCEPTIONS:
-ministers
-unemployment compensation [good cause]
-Amish dont have to eductae

55
Q

scrutiny level for FE Clause

A

discriminatory -> SS

discriminatory if:
-not neutral
-facially neutral (silent on face but by design targets general religion or a specific religion)

if generally applicable, not covered by FE

56
Q

FE gov benefits exclusion

A

A state may not limit eligibility for a generally available govern mental benefit to nonreligious organizations

so if gov provides textbooks to secular private schools, must provide to otherwise-eligible religious private schools

57
Q

Establishment Clause definition

A

The Establishment Clause prohibits government sponsorship of religion, meaning the government cannot aid or formally establish a religion. Like the Free Exercise Clause, it compels the government to pursue a course of neutrality toward religion.

58
Q

key concepts for Establishment Clause

A

-Neutrality principle
-no coercion (directly or indirectly) to coerce individuals to exercise or refrain from exercising
-history and tradition approach

59
Q

types of Establishment Clause cases

A

-sect preference (SS)
-cases unconnected to fin aid or edu(if it burdens small sect, generally invalid, but if burdens large segment of society that includes relig groups, gen valid) [Sunday closing law]
-fin benefits to relig institutions (must be neutral)
-relig activity in pub schools (neutral)