Bar Tips Document Flashcards
relevancy standard for evidence
any tendency to make an essential element more or less likely
excluding otherwise relevant evidence categories
-liability insurance
-subsequent remedial measures
-settlements
-withdrawn guilty pleas
-offers to pay med expenses
excluding otherwise relevant evidence categories
-liability insurance
-subsequent remedial measures
-settlements
-withdrawn guilty pleas
-offers to pay med expenses
prior identification
admissible if testifying now and subject to cross
prior consistent statements
only allowed to rebut charge of lying or exaggerating AND the statement was made before the motive to lie/exaggerate arose
excited utterance
-requires personal knowledge
-under stress of event
-look for exclamation points
past recorded recollection
-Attempt to refresh must have failed
-Then witness can read words into evidence
-Writing must have been made or adopted by witness when it was fresh in their mind and it is accurate
-Writing itself is not admitted unless offered by opposing party
-Only testimony generally admitted
business record
-Created as routine practice
-Admitted by personal w knowledge and duty to record
-Made at or near time event happened
-Kept in course of ordinary business
when is someone unavailable
PRISM
-privilege
-refusal to testify
-incapacitation (mental/phys)
-Subpoena (failure to comply)
-memory (lack of)
uh death?
what hearsay exceptions require the person be unavailable
-dying declaration
-former testimony
-declaration against interest
former testimony exception
-Under oath
-Party against whom it is offered must have had the opportunity and similar motive to develop the testimony either on cross, direct, or redirect
-Must have been same parties in substantially similar proceeding
5 rules for character evidence in criminal case
-Pros cannot intro [case-in-chief] rep or op evidence of D’s bad character if purpose is propensity [NO PROPENSITY EVIDENCE BY PROSECUTION]
-D can intro evidence of RELEVANT good character trait for propensity purposes (didn’t commit crime) [If D does this, he is limited to REPUTATION OR OPINION only [no specific acts]]
-If D does prevent evidence of good character, then he opens the door & pros can REBUT. [Pros limited to REP or OPINION, no specific acts]
-Evidence of prior crimes or bad acts are never admissible to show PROPENSITY [But may be admissible to prove another point in the case [MIMIC; impeachment]]
-If D testifies, he automatically places his character for TRUTHFULNESS OR UNTRUTHFULNESS [So can then impeach]
3 rules for character evidence in a civil case
o Char evidence inadmissible unless directly in issue [no propensity evidence]
o Neg entrustment [trustee]
o Fraud [D]
o Child custody [parent]
o Defamation [p]
o If litigant has other purpose for intro of character evidence, that’s ok
o If a party testifies, they auto place char for truthfulness or untruthfulness in issue
ways to impeach someone
o Prior inconsistent statement
o Bias or motive to misrepresent
o Prior conviction
o Specific acts of misconduct bearing on truthfulness/untruthfulness
o Rep or opinion evidence of untruthfulness
when is an offer not revocable
Paid-for option kx
Foreseeable detrimental reliance
Started performance under unilateral kx OR
Merchant firm offer
offer termination
Lapse of time: reasonable time
Revocation: offeror retracts offer [direct or indirect]
Rejection: counteroffer, conditional acceptance
Death
unconscionability
o Unconscionability (unfair surprise, oppressive terms – tested at time of formation of kx)
SoF exceptions
- Lease of year or less
- Part performance of real estate kx
o Payment, possession, improvement
o Need 2 out of 3 - Full performance
- Goods already accepted or already paid for
- Custom-made goods substantial beginning
- Judicial admissions
- Merchant confirmatory memo
parol evidence rule exceptions
-fix clerical errors
-explain ambiguous terms
-establish defense
Art 4 Privilege and Immunities Clause
Protects out of state residents from being discrim against esp relating to livelihood and civil liberties (important econ interests) – invalid unless substantial justification for law and no other available means. Doesn’t apply to corps. Could win on Art 4 or commerce clause here.