miracles Flashcards

1
Q

What is a realist?

A

Refers to a miracle as a real world event that breaks laws of nature or is unexplainable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is an antirealist?

A

Refers to the impact of an event in the ppl who experience them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who is a realist?

A

Hume

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Does Hume believe miracles are subjective or objective?

A

Objective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Who are anti realists?

A

Wiles, Holland + Tillich

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What do realists believe miracles are?

A

Extraordinary coincidence of nature
Brought up by a spiritual power, working through ppl

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

When was Hume alive?

A

18th century

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is Hume’s definition of a miracle?

A

A transgression of a law of nature by a particular volition of a deity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What’s an e.g. of a miracle as an extraordinary coincidence of beneficial nature?

A

Julian Koepcke being the 1 survivor on a plane crash out of 86 passengers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How many miracles did Jesus perform? Where is this stated?

A

37 miracles in New Testament

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is natural law?

A

What is possible + not possible for nature to do on its own

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is a miracle in terms of natural law?

A

Something that couldn’t have happened if nature alone was at work

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does John Mackie think?

A

Doesn’t believe in God but doesn’t think its unreasonable to think a God could break laws of nature

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the problem to the account of miracles being a violation of natural law?

A

Modern science doesn’t accept that natural laws can be violated
If a natural law is broken is it more likely that it was God or that we didn’t get the law right in the first place

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What does science think about violation of natural laws?

A

Natural laws can’t be broken, only revised

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How else can we consider natural laws?

A

Probabilistic - shows what’s likely not what’s defo gonna happen

17
Q

What do antirealists tend to believe?

A

The impact of the miracle over whether its possible or not

18
Q

Does Wiles believe miracles are objective or subjective? Why?

A

Subjective
Its an interpretation by the mind

19
Q

Why doesn’t Wiles like the idea of miracles as real world events?

A

It makes God seem like he has. favourites

20
Q

What would an anti realist say about the church explosion?

A

Its not a sign from God + didn’t break laws of nature but its interpreted that way bc of the impact

21
Q

What is the example of the sunset for the anti realists?

A

One person may see a sunset as a daily event; another may see it as a spiritual awakenings

22
Q

What is the baseline of an antirealists view of miracles?

A

It doesn’t matter what happens, if it feels like a miracle, it can be called a miracle

23
Q

What did Holland say about miracles?

A

Theres nothing miraculous about miracles except the way they’re interpreted

24
Q

What example does Holland give?

A
  • A child rides a toy car onto a railway + is stuck when train due to pass can’t stop
  • The train breaks inches from the child
  • The mother thinks of it as a miracle BUT the driver of the train fainted + his breaks were applied auto.
25
Q

What does the example from Holland tells us?

A

The mothers aware that God didn’t;t cause the driver to faint, but she interprets it as God’s response

26
Q

What are Hume’s 4 criticisms of miracles?

A
  • Theres never been a miracle reported by ‘sufficient’/’reliable’ witnesses
  • Ppl are nat. inclined to believe anything
  • Reports come from ignorant + barbarous nations
  • Miracle stories from diff. faiths cancel them out
27
Q

What are 4 counters to Humes criticisms of miracles?

A
  • Hume doesn’t give a def of ‘sufficient’/’reliable’ - vague
  • In 18th cent there wasn’t any science to explain stuff like there is today
  • Most recorded miracles came from Western countries (e.g. Lourdes)
  • Theists tend to believe in their religion only
28
Q

What does Hume say about a wise man? What does this mean?

A

A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence - we believe 100 accounts over 1

29
Q

Where does Hume’s argument about miracles differ from a Christians argument? Why might he be wrong?

A

He says the improbability of a miracle defeats the idea that it happened
But the whole point is that miracles are the least probable thing

30
Q

How does Tillich say we should interpret miracle stories?

A

Look at miracle stories as symbols

31
Q

What does Wiles say the one miracle was?

A

The 1 miracle was creation and then the universe was left un-intervened

32
Q

What example can be used to question God’s lovingness in terms of miraculous visions?

A

Why would God send a miraculous vision to Bernadette of Lourdes but not stop the holocaust?

33
Q

What shows significance of Hume’s views in ref to religious beliefs?

A
  • Miracles might be evidence for God’s existence
  • Confirms God’s positive attributes
  • God’s way of communicating w us
  • Theres no point in believing in a metaphorical resurrection
34
Q

What does Reza Aslan argue?

A

The Gospels exaggerated Jesus as a person + his 37 miracles
Ppl wrote Gospels 100s of years ago + prob wrote stuff to make Christianity seem worth following

35
Q

What shows significance of Wiles’ views in ref to religious belief?

A
  • Wiles’ views make the challenges of Hume irrelevant
  • More holistic view
  • Claims that Gods 1 intervention led to claims that he was a deist not theist
  • Wiles still claimed god was actively sustaining the world