Miracles Flashcards

1
Q

Realist view definition

A

The stance that miracles are seen as real events brought about by God.

Key thinker: Hume.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Anti realist view definition

A

The stance that miracles are an interpretation of the mind. They may be seen as symbols, as something that lifts the spirit or transforms the community.

Key thinker: Wiles.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Realism - Realist understandings of the world generally

A

-That scientific theories give us true (or approximately true) descriptions of the world.

-That they give us knowledge of things that we believe to exist but cannot observe.

-That the world is mind-independent: it exists the way it is, regardless of what we think.

-Applied to miracles, a realist account sees them as real events brought about by God lor someone empowered by God).
Exists as a real being, transcendent and unobservable, who creates and cares for world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Realism applied to miracles

A

-Applied to miracles, a realist account sees them as real events brought about by God lor someone empowered by God). E.g Moses and Elijah in the Old Testament
Exists as a real being, transcendent and unobservable, who creates and cares for world

-God exists as a transcendent and unobservable being; nevertheless miracles are evidence of God’s existence and of his care for the world.

-These things are true despite the fact that we do not understanding everything about miracles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

First realist understanding

A

Miracles as an extraordinary coincidence of a beneficial nature

-(Miracles are like amazing coincidences that bring good things, often thought to be from a higher power)

-eg
One example of a coincidence-miracle is the West Side Baptist Church gas explosion, which happened in Nebraska in 1950. The explosion demolished the church and would have killed its choir, but all 15 members were late (each for different reasons) for choir practice on that day and so all avoided certain death.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Miracles as an extraordinary coincidence of a beneficial nature
Critical analysis

A

example is Juliane Koepcke’s survival of a plane crash in 1971. She was on board Flight 508 from Lima to Pucallpa when it crashed in a thunderstorm, killing all 6 crew and 85/86 passengers. Juliane was the sole survivor.

-If God helped Juliane Koepcke to survive, what about the other 91 passengers and crew who did not? Does this not raise questions about God’s omnibenevolence?

-Were the other passengers less worthy? Why does God ‘pick and choose’ who he performs miracles for? Could this prove it was not a divine miracle?

-west side baptist church, could be a coincidence who says its God

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Second realist understanding

A

Miracle as an event brought about by the power of God or another spiritual power, working through people

-The Bible contains many examples of God acting through persons this way.

For example, God acts through Moses, whose actions in carrying about the 10 plagues on Egypt in Exodus are given through the power of Yahweh

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Miracle as an event brought about by the power of God or another spiritual power, working through people

Critical analysis

A

-The 10 Plagues could be alternatively explained - for example, ‘The sudden appearance of red-hued waters in the Nile could have been caused by a red algae bloom’. People attributed them to God as they lacked scientific understanding of the phenomena happening.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Third realist understanding

A

Miracle as a violation of natural law

-A miracle is something that could not have happened if nature alone was at work, so is an event brought about by the intervention of a supernatural power - which for many is God.

-The ‘classic’ account of the view that a miracle is a violation of the laws of nature comes from David Hume. Hume had three parts to his definition:

  1. A miracle is a transgression of a law of nature
  2. By a particular volition (an act of will)
  3. By the Deity (God) - or by the interposition (intervention) of some invisible agent.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Mackie quote on miracles

A

“We can think of a supernatural intervention as something that intrudes into a system from outside the natural world as a whole” (Mackie)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Miracle as a violation of natural law

critical analysis

A

-John Hick: Violation miracles are impossible. If there appears to be an exception to a law of nature, then the law simply expands to include the exception.

-Science does not accept that natural laws can be violated

-Laws of nature and not like laws of legislation - they cannot just be broken.

-If an event does not conform with what a scientific law predicts, there are three possibilities:

(a) The evidence for that particular event is faulty

(b) There is an unknown factor at play that the ‘law’ hasn’t accounted for

(c) The law needs to be adapted or expanded to take a new event into account.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the anti-realist understanding of miracles? (Tillich and Holland)

A

-Anti-realist understandings deny that we can have knowledge of a mind-independent world, since the phenomena observed by our senses are interpreted by the mind.

-Anti-realists believe that the idea of miraculous intervention in this world by a transcendent God is not a sensible idea. Instead, miracles are ‘in the mind’ - they are mental states or attitudes that are to be understood in terms of psychology and sociology.

• Anti-realists focus on the state of mind, rather than the event itself.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Paul Tillich - Miracles are sign-events
Quote

A

“Miracles cannot be interpreted in terms of a supernatural interference in natural processes”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Roy Holland - Miracles are based on personal interpretation / Form of Life.
Quote

A

“A coincidence can be taken religiously as a sign and called a miracle.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Keith Ward - Miracles are ‘epiphanies of spirit’ (supports Tillich)
QUOTES

A

“The robe remains intact; the miracle is mainly in my mind”.

“The subjective element of the apprehension of a miracle, rather than the objective nature of the event itself”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

John Hick - A miracle is any event that is experienced as a miracle
QUOTES

A

“For a miracle, whatever else it may be, is an event through which we become vividly and immediately conscious of God acting towards us”

“In order to be miraculous, an event must be experienced as religiously significant. Indeed, we may say that a miracle is any event that is experienced as a miracle”

17
Q

Roy Holland - Miracles have meaning within Forms of Life

A

“A coincidence can be taken religiously as a sign and called a miracle.”

-Holland argues there is actually nothing miraculous about these coincidences, but that we interpret them in this way based on our beliefs.

-Calling these events miracles is a MEANINGFUL thing for people within the religious
Form of Life. It is consistent with their belief in a loving, caring, involved God.

18
Q

DAVID HUME - ATHEIST
Realist

A

-he is an empiricist

-he says we should rely on our sense experience- if something happens that is totally against it he says it is far more likely we are mistaken

-There is no God who is able to violate natural laws.

-Realist approach to miracles

-Focused on the evidence (or lack of!)

-he does not believe miracles happen. He is saying if they do happen it would be a real event caused by God that breaks the rules of nature

19
Q

MAURICE WILES - CHRISTIAN
Anti realist

A

-God exists but chooses not to intervene.

-Antirealist approach to miracles

-Wiles argues that Biblical accounts are symbolic / myths.

-Focused on the message (the symbolic meaning).

20
Q

Hume: It is impossible for human testimony to prove a miracle

A

-Hume is an empiricist who seeks to subject accounts of miracles to proper scrutiny.

-He works on the understanding that the more evidence we have for any event, the higher its probability.

-Reports of miracles - such as Jesus walking on water - cannot be repeated or tested.

-Miracles are always ‘maximally improbable events’ - this necessary improbability defeats the idea that a miracle has happened.

21
Q

Hume: It is impossible for human testimony to prove a miracle

QUOTE

A

“No testimony is sufficient to establish a miracle, unless the testimony be of such a kind, that its falsehood would be more miraculous, than the fact, which it endeavours to establish”

22
Q

Hume: Claims of miracles are faith-based fabrications

A

‘The Christian religion is founded on faith, not on reason’

Hume writes that most accounts of miracles come from
‘ignorant and barbarous nations’
and - where they are found in civilised countries - this is because they had ‘ignorant and barbarous ancestors’.

-Looking back through history, we cannot find even one strong example of a miracle properly attested by men of sufficient good sense, integrity, education and learning.

-None of the miracle accounts available to us would convince us that the witnesses were not deluded, mistaken or lying.

23
Q

Wiles Language about miracles is symbolic, not literal

A

-He warns that a literal understanding means the ‘whole relation of God and the world becomes a nest of absurdities’.

-The idea of a God who sometimes chooses to intervene with the Laws of Nature is unfair: it is ‘not merely implausible and superfluous from the standpoint of human explanation, but religiously unsatisfactory in view of their apparently occasional and highly selective character’.

-Problem of Evil and Suffering:

24
Q

Arguments against hume

A

-he cant prove it
It is an inductive argument

-all the arguments can be challenged

-it doesn’t matter to most religious believers that miracles have little evidence-for some thats the whole point

25
Q

Comparing Hume and Wiles

A

• Hume is an atheist; he defines a miracle as an act done by God that breaks the laws of nature but rejects the idea that this can happen

• By defining a miracle differently, Wiles avoids many of Hume’s criticisms of miracles

• Wiles accepts that miracle stories can have profound effects on people, but the miracles do not need to have literally occurred for these effects to be meaningful

26
Q

What is the significance of realist views for
Christianity?

A

Biblical and eschatological significance

-The central miracle of the New Testament is the resurrection of Christ. In his letter to the Corinthians, St Paul writes that ‘if Christ has not been raised, your faith is pointless and you are still in your sins’. The resurrection is the foundation of the Christian faith.

-Christianity is grounded in belief in Biblical miracles.

Divine significance

-Miracles confirm God’s providence and care.

-God has both the power and the love to be active in the world.

27
Q

What is the significance of anti-realist views for Christianity?

A

Tillich sees God not as a being, but as
‘Being-itself’.

-Miracles cannot contradict the rational structure of reality, so are not interventions by a transcendent God.

-They are ‘sign-events’ that cannot be divorced from their religious context, which is religious experience.

-The significance of miracles is primarily personal and psychological.

Holland sees miracles as events with deep personal significance

-Wiles sees miracles as events that reveal something of God’s intentions for the world: so the miracles in the New Testament are about inspiring people to overcome evil and suffering.

-The significance of these interpretations is that miracles do not relate to events brought about by a ‘real’ God

-their reality is in the mind of the person who experiences the event - it has personal significance.