Mini Exam With Gerry Flashcards
Which court would bankruptcy or divorce cases be heart in?
County court - within civil courts
Name 3 sources of law in the UK?
Common law
Precedent
EU law
What kind of offences are heard at crown court?
Indictable only offences + some either way offences.
Examples - murder, serious fraud
What is the name given singly or collectively to barristers?
Counsel !!!
What are the two main divisions of law?
Criminal and civil
What is the serious harm test in defamation cases ?
Any statement that is likely to or causes serious harm to someone’s reputation.
What are the 3 criteria a claimant has to prove to sue successfully in libel law?
The DIP test :
- Defamation : it must be proven to be defamatory - likely to or has caused serious harm to reputation
- Identified : person has to be identified (even if they are not named - they can be identified as person referred to)
- Published : statement has to be published to a third person
What are the potential dangers of not naming someone when publishing a potential defamatory comment?
- they might still be identified through the statement. If they are seen to be the person referred to
E.g. if you made a defamatory statement that a worker at a crematorium was guilty of theft. If there was only one worker there - he would be identified!
Mistaken identity
- Banbury CID
Who can and cannot sue in libel law?
Who can sue: individuals who believe they have been defamed
Companies - criteria for this is: any business who can prove they have or are likely to suffer serious financial loss.
Who cannot sue :
The dead - the family on their behalf, public bodies, the government
What does the repetition rule mean in libel law?
Any fresh publication of a defamatory statement can lead to more defamation legal action
What is the ‘single publication law’ in libel law?
Brought in in 2013.
A defamatory statement published online can only be subject to defamation cases once - when it is published online the first time
What are the main defences a journalist has against a defamation claim? (There’s 8) bloody hell
- truth defence - when you can prove something is substantially true on balance of probability
- honest opinion - 4 requirements : recognisable as opinion, based on true facts, must be honestly held review, bust inducing the fact or information on which it is based
- qualified privilege part 1 - defence for reporting what is said in Parliament, as long as you report fairly and accurately in public interest.
- qualified privilege part 2- for official documents, press releases -> you can report on these if you report fairly and accurately on a matter of public interest AND if defamed person requests - they can add a reasonable statement to your piece.
- absolute privilege - whatever is said in open court can be reported as long as it is fair and accurate
- innocent dissemination - section 1 defence of 1996 defamation act - if websites allow comments - online organisations should not monitor those comments - because that is seen as moderation. If someone is defamed on those comments and someone alerts you - you then remove them. 2013 update - you can monitor and filter out defamatory comments.
- protection of accord and satisfaction - if someone complains about something - you come up with agreed words between you that would be published. Then no more legal action can take place.
- offer of amends - if you try to make amends judge will take that into consideration.
What is the honest opinion defamation defence?
Section 3 of 2013 act
1- must be recognisable as comment or opinion - ‘I’ think that ….
2- must be based on provably true facts - the production took place
3- must be honestly held view - not motivate by malice.
4- must indicate the fact of information on which it is based. - you’ve witnessed show’s star forgetting his lines. Need justification for your bad review.
Matthew wright fell foul of this !
When doing questions on this give examples.
What are the criteria for court reports to maintain absolute privilege?
Remember MPS have parliamentary privilege so can’t be done for defamation.
- must report accurately
- fairly
- Contemporaneous (must be published at first opportunity)
- from public court cases
What are the criteria for qualified privilege to be met in any reports of public bodies? Part 1
Also tell me part 2 about verbal statements
Fair
Accurate
Matter of public interest without malice
Part 2 - defamed person on request can get their reasonable explanation or contradiction published. (Right to reply)
What is the term for a person who sues another in civil law?
Claimant
What Is the definition of a concurrent sentence?
More than one prison sentence is handed down and You serve the highest one for both sentences.
6months for this, 5 months for this - you would serve 6 months in total.
What does ‘fair dealing’ mean in copyright law ?
You should avoid excessive copying of other people’s stories.
You can rewrite someone else’s story but copying a story to avoid this - but verbatim is not qualified in fair dealing defence.
Crediting interviews!
With video - can use up to 8 seconds without asking permission!