Mind over Money || Flashcards
How do people spend their money?
Elizabeth Dunn has done lots of research on this
- Her conclusions are that you need to spend money on experiencing rather than things
- Adults under 25 are tending to do this more
- If you look at how we perceive time, it’s not just on our experience in the present moment. There are time frames going on
- When you spend money on an experience, you enjoy the experience at the time and look back on it after
- Evidence on a whole says spend money on experience not products, if you want your money to improve your well-being
- Paying on something months in advance doesn’t feel as close to the pain of paying
Another study showing how to spend money by Dunn et al. (2008)
- gave people a well being scale
- gave the same people an envelope with either $5 or $20 with a note either saying ‘please spend this money on yourself, you have until 5pm’ or ‘please spend this money on someone else, or give it to charity, you have until 5 pm’
- at 5pm they then gave them another scale
- they found: the people with higher well being were the people from the second group who spent money on other people and not themselves
What do we know about giving out money?
We know that giving away money makes us happier
Another study showing people who said they did kind things more often, gave kindness and observed kindness had higher levels of well being.
Income, gender and giving money to charity
In higher income countries, on average women give more to charity where as in low income countries men give more on average to charity.
Paul Piff:
Pedestrian crossings
He hides in pedestrian crossings and see whether cars stop to let people cross and then looks to see how expensive their car was
Found: People driving more expensive cars were less likely to cross
Criticisms:
* what car someone was driving doesn’t necessary reflect their income
Paul Piff:
monopoly
- made people artificially rich
- gave some people at the start of the game twice as much money to start with
Found: - the people who were artificially rich took more than their fair share of pretzels (bowl of pretzels was put in the middle)
- would think the people who won was because they had an unfair advantage of the game however people who had an unfair advantage didn’t think it to was to do with this and they just thought they were more skilled
Paul tiff:
titanic
- Questionnaires eg. about entitlement
- If i was in titanic, would you desreve to be saved first
Found: - People on higher incomes deserved to be saved and be on the first lifeboat
Study on dropping letters:
Dropping stamped letters and counting up how many get posted in different neighbourhoods
Found:
letters dropped in more expensive areas were more likely to get posted than in the poorer areas
Study on Donor
Donor:
Look to see which states in the US have the most altruistuic kidney donors to stranger
Found:
richer states are more likely however, there might be different restrictions or people who have high demanding jobs wouldn’t be able to get recovery time
Financial incentives
Experiment done in schools in the US
Procedure
- gave pupils money if they did things well
- was controversial because these were large sums of money
- wanted to know if they could improve academic success
- in the end they paid out 9.4 million dollars to 36,000 children
- trails were done in NY, Chicago, Dallas, Washington and Houston
- In different studies they were done in different studies:
- in NY: 10 year olds were paid $25 and 13 year olds $50 if they got A grades
- in Washington: paid for attendance and if they got their homework in on time. Some people felt that it was unethical. Whatever the ethics you would expect it to work
Financial incentives
Experiment done in schools in the US
Results
- in NY and Chicago where you paid for grade, it didn’t make much difference to grades but in Chicago attendance did improve
- in Washington, results on reading test rose for some subjects but not other subjects
- in Houston- they paid them to study particular areas and in maths they got better on these areas
- in Dallas- they were rewarded for particular things such as a chapter. The results here were the highest
Therefore for incentives to work you need to know how to get the grades
Question of ‘what happens when the incentives stop?’
Loss aversion- there is a risk that people could see it as a loss
What are some opinions on financial incentives?
Some people said could providing financial incentives take the joy out?
Sometimes it is better to offer no payment at all than to pay them as what they see as an insulting amount?
Stanerela and friends
Never pay a friend to do a favor because as soon as you do it it puts them in a financial state of mind. And people are very sensitive to being ripped off.
If its peace work- the more blackberries you pick, the more money you get so you do it faster
Incentives can backfire for many reasons:
Problem 1: intrinsic motivations- joy comes from the task itself
- Students got given blocks with a picture which shape they have to put it into.
- First of all no money was involved and they were watched through a one-way mirror
- When they were given a break and they continued working
- Next time, each time they got one right they got a dollar for it.
- When given a break they didn’t continue working
- This is because it now felt it was work so didn’t enjoy it as much
- If any is linking to performance- what message is it sending that people need to be paid extra to do something. Any interaction changes once money is brought into it
- so… incentive needs to be the right size