Milgrim-obedience To Authority Flashcards

1
Q

What is obedience?

A
  • when person feels pressure to change behaviour

- change to comply with order from authoritative figure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What were the aims of this study?

A
  • wanted to answer the question as to why the Germans followed hitlers orders
  • were Germans different?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who was the key figure in this research?

A

-milgrim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was the procedure?

A
  • 40 males recruited through flyers
  • biased coin was flipped meaning confederate would always be learner
  • pp sees learner strapped in chair
  • pp given a 45V shock
  • learner got a shock for every wrong answer and this increased in voltage
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was the range of voltage used in this study?

A

-15V to 450V (marked XXX)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What were the 4 prompts? (Only learn 1 and 4)

A
  1. Please continue
  2. experiment requires you continue
  3. essential you continue
  4. You have no choice, you must go on
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What were the findings?

A
  • no pp stopped bellow 300 volts (uk maximum is 250)
  • 65%carried on to 450V
  • pp’s seemed distressed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What signs showed pp’s were distressed?

A
  • biting nails

- 3 has uncontrollable seizures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What were the conclusions from these findings?

A
  • Americans acted the same as Nazis
  • shows people act different to how they believe in pressure situations
  • 65% would have killed someone
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Evaluate how the study had low internal validity?

A

WEAKNESS

  • guessed shocks were real=demand characteristics
  • supported by perry who listened to tapes and many pp’s expressed their doubts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Evaluate what the test on puppies show?

A

STRENGTH

  • 1972 test on puppies
  • 55% males and 100% women delivered fatal shocks to puppies (real shocks)
  • shows milgrims study had genuine results
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

evaluate why there is good external validity

A

STRENGTH

  • lab environment reflects wider authority relationships in real life
  • supported by (HOFFLING) who studied nurses obedience giving them unjustified demands
  • 21/22 nurses obeyed = Milgrim correct
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

why does the nurses study NOT support milgrim’s study?

A

WEAKNESS

  • nurses given unfamiliar drug
  • requested higher dosage
  • given orders over phone
  • weren’t allowed to confer with each other
  • these factors don’t represent real life
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what are the 3 situational variables?

A
  • proximity
  • location
  • uniform
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

explain proximity as a situational variable

A
  • in Milgrim’s original study when they were in adjared rooms= 65% conformity
  • forced hand on shock plate=30%
  • experimenter left room= 20.5%
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

explain location as a situational variable

A
  • conducted in a run down building unlike Yale university
  • less authority
  • obedience fell to 45.5%
17
Q

explain uniform as a situational variable

A
  • original experimenter wore a grey lab coat
  • experimenter called away in this variation, role was taken over by a member of the public
  • obedience fell to 20%
18
Q

what are the 3 evaluation points for situational variables?

A
  • research support
  • lack of internal validity
  • cross-cultural replications
19
Q

evaluate research support for uniform as a situational variables?

A

STRENGTH

  • field experiment in new york
  • confederates dressed in 3 outfits: suit and tie / milk man/security guard
  • asked passers by to do simple tasks eg. pick litter
  • people were twice as likely to obey security guard than suit and tie
20
Q

evaluate lack of internal validity for situational variables

A

WEAKNESS

  • pp’s realised procedure was fake due to extra manipulation
  • unclear whether results were due to demand characteristics or genuine.
21
Q

evaluate cross-cultural replications for situational variables

A
  • replication in Spain showed 90% obedience
  • shows his findings are not limited to american males
  • external validity =generalised
  • HOWEVER…-variations have only taken place in developed countries (spain)
  • cannot be generalised to everyone