Milgrams research Flashcards

milgrams baseline test, 3 variations

1
Q

Why did Milgram want to study obedience?

A

he wanted to understand tragedies such as the holocaust and was interested in the case of Adolf Eichmann who denied killing anyone and that he was just following orders- even though it lead to the death of millions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

how was the sample selected in Milgram’s baseline study (1963)?

A

self-selected, responded to advertisements through the newspaper and post advertising a study into learning and memory. They were offered payment of $4.50 for participation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what was the sample of Milgram’s baseline study (1963)?

A

40 male participants aged 20-65, all white and from Connecticut, USA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what was the aim of Milgram’s baseline study (1963)?

A

to investigate the extent to which ordinary people would obey an authority figure, even when instructed to harm another person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

how were the roles of learner and teacher decided in Milgram’s baseline study (!963)

A

a fixed draw as the participant was aways the teacher and the other (confederate) participant was the learner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

1)What kind of experiment was Milgram’s baseline study (1963)?
2)where did it take place?

A

1) Lab experiment
2) Yale university

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How were the rooms in Milgram’s baseline study set up?

A

in one room the ‘learner’ (confederate) was strapped to a chair with electrodes and in the other room there was the ‘teacher’ and an experimenter (also a confederate) who wore a grey lab coat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe the method of Milgram’s baseline study (1963)

A

The teacher was given a 45V test shock and watched the learner get strapped into the chair.
the learner was given lists of word pairs to learn, the teacher had to test the learner on these word pairs from a list of 4 options. Wrong answers resulted in the teacher being instructed to deliver an electric shock. The learner purposefully gave wrong answers.
If the teacher hesitated, the experimenter gave 4 verbal probs.
Afterwards participants were debriefed and reassured no one was harmed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What were the 4 verbal prods given by the experimenter in Milgram’s baseline study (1963)?

A
  1. “please continue”
  2. “the experiment requires that you continue”
  3. “it is absolutely essential that you continue”
  4. “you have no other choice, you must continue”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what percentage of participants went to 300V in Milgram’s baseline study (1963)?

A

100%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what were the conclusions of Milgram’s baseline study (1963)?

A
  1. ordinary people are highly obedient to authority figures, even when their actions conflict with personal morals
  2. situational factors such as presence of an authority figure, setting and uniform influences behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what percentage of participants went to 450V in Milgram’s baseline study (1963)?

A

65%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

between 300-450V how many participants dropped out after all 4 verbal prods were exhausted during Milgram’s baseline study (1963)?

A

14

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what qualitative data was collected during Milgram’s baseline study (1963)?

A

sweating
trembling
nervous laughter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what were the issues with the generalisability of Milgram’s baseline study (1963)? (G.r.a.v.e)

A

sample was ethnocentric, they were all male and all white so it’s hard to generalise results to whole population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is a strength in the generalisability of Milgram’s baseline study (1963)?

A

volunteers tend to listen to instructions and take the procedure seriously which is representative of people in real life situations of power being misused

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what criticism did Milgram’s baseline study (1963) receive? (g.R.a.v.e)

A

Gina Perry said Milgram did not follow standardised procedures. The experimenter (John Williams) admitted to Perry that Milgram was only strict about the pre-scripted prods in the first study and afterwards William was free to improvise. This made obedience in the variations seem higher than it really was

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what was good in terms of reliability about Milgram’s baseline study (1963)? (g.R.a.v.e)

A

high reliability as it can be replicated- between 1961-62 he carried out 19 variations of his baseline study. Burger (2009) replicated aspects of variation #5 , #17 and #8, he followed Migram’s script wherever possible indicating high reliability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

How was there inter-rate reliability in Milgram’s baseline study (1963)? (g.R.a.v.e)

A

Milgram filmed parts of his study allowing viewers to review his findings.

18
Q

how can the findings of Milgram’s baseline study (1963) be applied to real-life?

A

understanding how obedience to authority works and how this can be used to increase obedience in settings such as schools and prisons. Authority figures should wear symbols of authority (uniform) and justify their authority with reference to the “greater good”

19
Q

What historical tragedies can the findings of Milgram’s baseline study (1963) be applied to? (g.r.A.v.e)

A

Milgram’s findings can be linked to the My Lai massacre. In 1968, a group of US soldiers (“Charlie company”) killed the 800 inhabitants of a Vietnamese village killing old men, women and children. One of the soldiers was jailed with a 20year sentence but this was halved and then he was later released on parole. He said he was only following orders from his superiors.

20
Q

how can the findings of Milgram’s baseline study (1963) be useful? Give an example (g.r.A.v.e)

A

A better understanding means tragedies such as the holocaust/Nazi Germany and the My Lai massacre can be possibly prevented in the future. For example, solders can be trained to refuse and report orders that would be war crimes.

21
Q

What was the main problem in terms of validity with Milgram’s baseline study (1963)? (g.r.a.V.e)

A

The study lacked ecological validity because the task was artificial- in real life teachers aren’t asked to electrocute students.

22
Q

How does Milgram respond to the criticism of the validity of his baseline study (1963)? (g.r.a.V.e)

A

Milgram counters by saying events like the Holocaust were just as unusual and strange and people in these situations had felt similarly to his participants “they had been dropped into an unfamiliar situation and didn’t know how to respond”

23
What were some of the ethical issues regarding Milgram's baseline study (1963)? (g.r.a.v.E)
- they were deceived and did not give informed consent (they were told it was a memory test rather than an obedience test) -Their right to withdraw was compromised as the 4 verbal prods prevented the participants from doing so -Protection from harm: participants were exposed to psychological distress and showed symptoms such as nervous laughter, shaking and sweating -the participants were extensively debriefed and told the true aims of the study and met the confederate learner to ensure they know there was no real harm inflicted
24
Why did the participants in Milgram's baseline study (1963) obey?
-presitigious setting (Yale) may have caused the participants to be overawed and convinced nothing unethical could go on in there -verbal prods given by experimenter -participants volunteered and were being paid so they may have felt obligated due to that -experimenter wore a grey lab coat, a symbol of authority
25
what were the 3 of the 19 variations Milgram carried out that you study?
variation #7: telephonic instructions variation #10: Rundown office block variation #13: ordinary man gives orders
26
What was the only thing that changed in Milgram's variations ?
The independent variable
27
why was everything else kept the same in Milgram's variations?
everything else was kept the same with the same standardised procedure to ensure the cause and effect relationship between the IV and the DV
28
what was the aim of Milgram's variation #7: telephonic instructions?
to investigate the effect of the authority figure being absent from the room
28
what was the procedure of Milgram's variation #7: telephonic instructions?
the experimenter gave orders over the phone rather than face-to-face/ being present in the room, everything else was done the same
29
what were the results of variation #7: telephonic instructions?
9/40 (23%) were fully obedient
29
what was the conclusion of Milgram's variation #7: telephonic instructions?
physical proximity of the authority figure decreases dissent therefore people are more likely to follow orders when the authority figure is present
30
what was the aim of Milgram's variation #10: Rundown office block?
to see whether obedience would decrease if conducted in a less prestigious setting
31
what was the procedure of Milgram's variation #10: Rundown office block?
the experiment moved from Yale to an office suite in Bridgeport, Connecticut where participants were told it was ran by a private firm, everything else was done the same
32
what were the findings of Milgram's variation #10: Rundown office block?
obedience dropped to 47.5% and participants questioned the legitimacy of the research & voiced their concerns for the learners safety
33
what was the conclusion of Milgram's variation #10: Rundown office block?
the prestigious setting boosts obedience but obedience can still occur in less prestigious and the participants were less likely to obey as the authority seemed less legitimate as so were less likely to be in the agentic state as they did not feel like the experimenter would take responsibility
34
what was the aim of Milgram's variation #13: ordinary man gives orders?
to examine the effect of an authority figure's legitimacy on obedience
35
what was the procedure of Milgram's variation #13: ordinary man gives orders?
rather than 40 participants there were 20, 2 confederates of experimenter everything else done the same except at no point does the experimenter mention giving shocks to the 'learner' a fake phone call pulls the experimenter away but he asks the subjects to continue with the experiment the confederate time-taker enthusiastically suggests administering shocks which increase by 15V each time the learner makes a mistake and insists this procedure throughout the experiment
36
what were the results of Milgram's variation #13: ordinary man gives orders?
20% obedience
37
what was the conclusion of Milgram's variation #13: ordinary man gives orders ?
orders must come from a legitimate source to be effective
37
what was a strength of Milgram's variation #10: Rundown office block?
the more realistic setting of the rundown office block gave the study higher ecological validity than other lab-based variations
38
what is a strength of Milgram's variation #7: telephonic instructions?
high external validity as research has replicated the findings such as Sedikides and Jackson- 'at the zoo study' which also concluded once the authority figure is no longer present then the obedience drops
39
what was a weakness of Milgram's variation #13: ordinary man gives orders?
small sample size- only 20 participants in comparison to to 40 in the original baseline study and other variations
40
what are some strengths of Milgram's variations?
+Altogether Milgram had tested 780 people which is a large sample size and should remove anomalies +practical value- we have a surprising tendency to destructive obedience which highlights issue of the Holocaust as officers obeyed orders which broke moral codes +the high levels of control in the consistent procedures allowed for cause-and-effect conclusions about situational factors influencing obedience +procedure(s) was easy to replicate +visible signs of anguish cannot be faked which adds to the validity
40
what are some weaknesses of Milgram's variations?
+in some of the variations (like #13) he only tested 20 participants and a few rebellious individuals might skew the results. +procedure may be prone to demand characteristics as participants may have guessed nature of experiment due to cues +lacks ecological validity as the task of administering electric shocks to a stranger is not something people encounter in everyday life +studies are not ethical- they did not give informed consent, lack of protection from harm and they didn't have the full right to withdraw