Midterm Review Flashcards
Natural observation
A descriptive research technique of observing and recording behavior in naturally occurring situations without trying to manipulate and control the situation/environment. Phones and technology have turned this into a bigger sceince because online searching lets us see how people act/interact without interfering. Ex. observing who follows COVID protocol and how they do so.
Case study
A descriptive research technique where one individual or a small group is studied in depth to reveal universal principles that could apply to a larger group. This could include brain damage, children’s minds, etc.. They can be very revealing because it works with small numbers in detail, They suggest ideas, but we need to dig even deeper for the truth. Often, people use personal anecdotes to contradict case study results, but the plural of anecdote is not evidence, so these stories cannot be relied upon.
Survey
A descriptive research technique for obtaining self-reported attitudes and behaviors of a specific group. This is done by questioning a representative rando, sample of the group (everyone has an equal chance of being chosen). The downside is that people may lie about their answer to feel better about themselves and be more socially acceptable. The answers depend on the wording of the questions. In a survey, a question is asked, and the person may answer however they choose.
Hypothesis
What the researcher believes the experiment will show. Always phrase a hypothesis as an “if…then…” statement. Doing it this way helps identify the key parts of the experiment (the different variables). Ex. if you drink a sugary soda, then you will have a temporary sugar.
Independent variable
This is the “cause” of the experiment and what the researcher actually manipulates. When the researcher introduces the independent variable to the study, they are changing the condition of the people being experimented on because they are trying to see if the independent variable has an effect. Ex. the type of soda given to the groups.
Dependent variable
The effect of the independent variable. The outcomes or effect is dependent on what the researcher is manipulating. Ex. whether or not people get a sugar high.
Experimental group
The people being subject to the manipulative conditions that the researcher is controlling. They are subject to the independent variable/the cause of the experiment.
Control group
The other half of the people who are a part of the study but aren’t subject to the independent variable. These people think they’re being manipulated when they are actually just the baseline against what the experimental group is being measured. They are given a placebo of the independent variable to make them think they are in the experimental group.
Placebo
A fake of the independent variable given to the control group. Ex. sugar-free Dr. Pepper.
Double-blind procedure
When neither group (experimental and control) knows which group they are in. The only people who know are the experimenters.
Correlation
NOT causation. Variable A and B happen at the same time, but it has not been proven that one causes the other to happen. Ex. more ice cream, more shark attacks (positively correlated) Ex. more hours studying, less time spent watching TV (negatively correlated).
Causation
When Variable A causes variable B or vise versa. This is an average because variable A will not cause variable B (or vise versa) every time. Ex. doing ab exercises gives you abs.
Fundamental attirubtion error
The tendency for observers to underestimate the situation’s impact, and instead, overestimate the impact of personal traits. Ex. someone is late to work because of the traffic, but the boss attributes their lateness to the fact that they are sometimes lazy.
Self-serving bias
the tendency for us to attribute our personal successes to internal personal factors and our failures to external situational factors. Ex. we did well on a test because we studied hard and are a good student. Ex. we did bad on a test because the teacher made the test too hard, so it is not our fault.
Social influence
The process of inducing change in people
Social facilitation
In the presence of others, we perform better on simple well-learned tasks and worse on more difficult unlearned tasks. Ex. I will hit my spot for my changeup more, but I will not be able to kick a soccer ball well.
Social loafing
The tendency for people to exert less effort when they are working in a group to achieve a common goal than they would when they are individually accountable. Ex. someone will participate less when working on a group poster, but they will contribute a lot more when they work on the poster by themselves.
Deinduviduation
The loss of self-awareness and self-restraint in situations where people are able to feel anonymous. This will lead to individuals trolling others and getting aroused by it, causing the intensity to increase. When we shed self-awareness, we become more responsive and active in a group setting, usually exemplifying bad behavior because we feel we can simply get away from it.
Altruistic behavior
Unselfish regard for the welfare of others. Altruistic behavior puts the thoughts, feelings, and well-being of someone else completely above yourself. You are acting that way because it is in the best interest of the other person, not necessarily you as well.
Bystander effect
In a group of people, you are more likely to do or not do something. For example, if you are in an elevator with a bunch of people and someone drops a penny, you might not pick it up for them. On the other hand, if you see someone commit a random act of kindness around other people, you are more likely to do the same.
Conformity
A change in a person’ behavior or opinions because of a real or imagined pressure they feel from a person or group of people. You change the way you think, or you can also go along with something knowing that it is wrong.
Asch Line Experiment
A group of people were brought into a room (1 was the test subject and the rest were actors). They were shown a series of lines next to each other and were asked to state which was the shortest/tallest of all of them. At first, the actors and test subject all gave the correct answer. Then, after a bit, the actors started giving the obvious wrong answer. As a result, the test subject also gave the wrong answer because he felt an imagined pressure to conform to the people around him.
Normative social influence
A reason for conforming where a person observes what the people around them are doing, and they change their behavior to do the same thing because of the imagined pressure to do so (even if they do not want to). Ex. waiting in the halls before class to start because everyone else is.
Informational social influence
A reason for conforming where a person changes their behavior/thinking because of information/pressure from the group to do so. Ex. someone saw Ms. Murphy crying in her classroom, so people decided to stay in the halls based on learning this information, so you do the same.