Midterm 1 - Lecture 5 Flashcards
Sources of Variability Affecting Participants’ Scores on the DV
Conceptual independent variable + Error (can break into two components..) = DIFFERENT scores on the IV
Furthermore:
Conceptual independent variable + Random Error + Systematic Error = DIFFERENT scores on the IV
Error: sources of variability in your measure (DV) caused by things other than your conceptual independent variable
We can measure and separate systematic error only with…
repeated measures designs
Random error:
- Misreading/misunderstanding questions
- Time of day
- Recording error (e.g., wrong bubble in scantron)
- Threatens reliability
Systematic Error:
- “systematically decrease or increase scores on DV”
- Ps’ Response biases (eg upper vs lower scale end)
- Individual differences (E.g. Reaction time -generally fast or slow
- Threatens construct validity
The more random variability in DV, the harder it is to…
detect the effects/attributes of the IV
- Separating out (i.e. controlling or removing)variability from systematic error allows the impact of the IV to be more obvious.
What causes participants’ scored on the DV to differ from each other? (3 reasons)
- Causes:
a. IV (if there’s an effect)
b. Random error
c. Systematic error
More variability =
= more overlap between DV for condition 1 vs. condition 2
- harder to see differences due to IV (assuming there is an effect)
Less variability (removed math ability)
= less overlap
easier to see differences due to IV
Benefits of Repeated Measures Designs:
- Can help us identify the effect of the IV on the DV
○ Identifies some of the random error variability in the DV scores to be systematic
○ Remove systemic error from ratio
○ Means we can use fewer participants