Midterm 1 Flashcards
Research evidence makes conclusions _____________
More or less likely, not guaranteed.
Formulated explanations as to how things work
Theories
Testable/falsifiable prediction
Hypothesis
2 characteristics of a good theory
- Falsifiable
- Parsimonious
When something is able to be proven wrong
Falsifiable
When something says a lot with few words
Parsimonious
Difference between research question and hypothesis
research question = question your study will answer
hypothesis = what you expect to find
Method or procedure since 17th century, characterized by systematic observation, measurement, experiment, and formulation, testing, modification of hypotheses
The Scientific Method (or Galilean Method)
2 main objectives of scientific research
- Theory building (induction)
- Theory testing (deduction)
Suggesting an explanation for the way people behave
Induction
Collecting evidence to show whether a theory is a good or bad explanation for the way people behave
Deduction
Theories > hypthesis > Research
Deductive reasoning
Research (observation) > hypothesis > theories
Inductive reasoning
Deductive reasoning is ____ driven
theory driven
Inductive reasoning is ____ driven
Data driven
Something that varies
Variable
Measures within a given variable are _____
Mutually exclusive
4 levels of measurement
- Nominal
- Ordinal
- Interval
- Ratio
Variables where data is only classified
Nominal variable
Categorical variables
Nominal and ordinal
Continuous variables
Interval and ratio
Variable data is ranked
Ordinal
Variables with meaningful difference between values, can contain negative, arbitrary 0
Interval variable
Variables with meaningful 0 point, no negative numbers
Ratio variable
Examples of nominal variables (4)
-Jersey Numbers
-Birth month
-Make of car
-Gender
Examples of ordinal variables (4)
-Rank in class
-education level (“high school”,”BS”,”MS”,”PhD”)
-satisfaction rating (“extremely dislike”, “dislike”, “neutral”, “like”, “extremely like”)
-Ability (beginner, intermediate, advanced)
Examples of interval variables (4)
-Temperature
-Shoe size
-Blood Pressure
-IQ score
Examples of ratio variables (4)
-Number of patients seen
-Distance to class
-temperature in Kelvin (0.0 Kelvin really does mean “no heat”)
-Weight
Ethical balance in psychology
Costs (risk to participants in a study) vs benefits (advances to knowledge).
3 types of descriptive research
- Case Studies
- Survey Research
- Naturalistic Observation
2 Types of Correlational research
- Cross-sectional
- Longitudinal
2 Types of Correlational research
- Cross-sectional
- Longitudinal
2 types of experimental research
- Experimental
- Quasi-experimental.
Study in a rare population on one or a small group of individuals, involving rich data
Case study
Limitations of a case study
-Individ. subject can’t be replicated
-Might generalize wrong
Observing behaviour in its natural habitat, without intervening
Naturalistic observation
Research on trends in public opinion or knowledge
Survey research
“gold standard” research design
Experiment
Cross-sectional or longitudinal research, tests for relationships between variables
Correlational design
3 questions a correlational design answers
- Significant association between variables.
- Direction (+/-) of association
- Size of association
Positive correlation graph
/
Negative correlation graph
\
If the association is a horizontal line on the graph, what is the relationship?
r = 0, no linear relationship
Another name for Correlation (r)
Pearson’s r
What does ‘r’ show
Direction + strength of association
Range of association for ‘r’
+1 = perfect positive linear relationship
0 = no relationship
-1 = perfect negative linear relationship
Can ‘r’ be used for non-linear relationships?
No, it has to be linear
When there is an association between 2 variables, what are the 3 causal options?
- A causes changs in B.
- B causes changes in A.
- C (unmeasured 3rd variable) causes changes in A and B.
the phenomenon that occurs when individuals believe that personality descriptions apply specifically to them (more so than to other people), despite the fact that the description is actually filled with information that applies to everyone.
The Forer effect
How to operationalize a variable
A specific definition/measure of the variable that the study will recognize.
Why is a linear relationship NOT good evidence of causation? (2)
- Directionality
- 3rd variable
Which research design is the ONLY way to begin to establish cause and effect?
Experiment
Participants are randomly assigned to the conditions to control for extraneous variables.
True experiment
Participants are randomly assigned conditions (experimental vs control)
Random assignment
Key features of experiments (2)
- Manipulation of a single variable
- Random assignment.
Why do we only manipulate the IV in an experiment
to avoid confounds
When is random assignment more effective at eliminating confounds?
When the number of participants increases
Participants are randomly selected to be part of the sample
Random selection
What does random selection impact?
Generalizability
What does random assignment impact?
Internal validity
The effect of IV on DV
causal link
Extraneous variable that varies with levels of the IV
Confounding variable
Can all confounding variables be controlled?
No
Comparing different participants in different conditions
Between-group designs
Neither the subject nor the experimenter knows the conditions that the subject is in
Randomised Double Blind Trial (RDBT) or Randomised Control Trial (RCT).
Control condition that is inactive/has no external influence
Placebo
Researcher unconsciously manipupulates experiment to find expected result.
Experimenter expectancy effect
Any feature of an experiment that might inform participants of purpose of the study, and influence participants behaviour to help/hurt the study
Demand characteristics
4 measurement types of psych variables (spheres of psychological inquiry)
- Cognition
- Affect
- Behaviour
- Physiology
Defining a variable + how you will measure it.
Operational definition
Measures of psychological constructs (3)
- Self report
- Physiological response.
- Behaviour/performance
Asking participants to rate their opinions on a scale of least to most
Likert scale
How can we verify results of a psych experiment?
Reproduce the same results using different measures
2 things that make a good measure
- Validity
- Reliability
Measuring what you hope/think you’re measuring (accuracy)
Validity
Measuring the same results consistently (stability)
Reliability
the extent to which you can generalize the findings of a study to other situations, people, settings, and measures.
External validity
the degree of confidence that the causal relationship being tested is trustworthy and not influenced by other factors or variables.
Internal validity
Whether the environment of the study mirrors a real-world setting
ecological validity
What can descriptive statistics show us (2)
- Central tendency
- Variability
Measures of central tendency (3)
Mean
Median
Mode
Arithmetic average, add all scores and divide by number of scores
Mean
Score that divides group in half, 50% of values fall above and 50% fall below
Median
Most frequently occurring score
Mode
Which measure of central tendency is most useful in psych?
Mean
Why can mean sometimes be misleading?
It is very sensitive to outliers/extreme values
in a normal distribution, how many results fall within 1 SD of the mean
68%
in a normal distribution, how many results fall within 2 SD of the mean
95%
in a normal distribution, how many results fall within 3 SD of the mean
99.7%
Negative skew on a graph
/
Positive skew on a graph
\
When skewed, where do the central tendency measures fall (in direction of skew)
Mode, median, mean
The spread of a distribution of scores
Variability
Max - min scores =
Range
What is typical of that variable, with no unit
Standard Deviation
Subjective conscious experience of psychophysiological expressions, biological reactions, mental states
Emotion
Difference between emotion and mood
Emotions influence how we act, moods influence how we perceive
characteristics of emotions (2)
- Positive or negative
- Pattern of physiological activity
characteristics of emotions (2)
- Positive or negative
- Pattern of physiological activity
Dimensions of emotions (2)
- Arousal
- Valence
How positive/negative an emotion is
Valence
How active/passive an experience is (level of physiological reactivity)
Arousal
Essential feature of all emotion
Experience
Emotions are responses to
Our interpretation of events (appraisals)
Emotions lead to
Action tendencies
Our readiness to engage in relevant behaviours
Action tendencies
Theory that stimulus triggers activity in autonomic nervous system, produces emotional experience
James-Lange Theory
Problems with James-Lange theory (4+)
- Emotional experiences happen faster than bodily responses.
- More emotions than physiological patterns.
- Body responds to non-emotional cues.
- Internal organs can’t make distinctions about emotional experience
emotional theory:
Stimulus > general state of bodily arousal > mind interprets as specific emotion
Two-factor theory
Problems with two-factor emotion theory (3)
-People don’t just have one bodily reaction to all stimuli
-Emotions aren’t just inferences about the causes of physiological arousal
-Involves a cognitive appraisal
Current emotional theories say
-Each emotion has some unique aspects
-Interpretation plays a vital role
Part of brain that plays role in fear/threat detector
Amygdala
Appraisal of emotion-relevant aspects of a stimulus is done by the
Amygdala
first part of brian that fear stimulus triggers
Thalamus
Quick fear response
stimulus > thalamus > amygdala > fear response
Slow fear response
stimulus > thalamus > sensory cortex > prefrontal cortex > amygdala > fear response