Michael: Behavior Analysis: A Radical Perspective Flashcards
Experimental Analysis
Research on operant functional relations employing Skinner’s methodology
Behavior analysts readily attribute to innate endowment many behavioral characteristics shared by all members of a species
Innate endowment for most people is the one that might help to explain behavioral differences among different people
3 kinds of behavioral relations
- All organisms inherit some fairly specific stimulus-response relations called unconditioned reflexes
- Some organisms inherit more complex environment-behavior relations, previously referred to as instinctive and now more likely to be called released behavior
e. g. mating behavior, nest building - Organisms inherit certain capacities to be changed behaviorally by the environment, thus the capacity for reflex responses to be conditioned to novel stimuli (respondent conditioning) and the capacity for some environmental occurrences to increase the future frequency of the type of behavior they follow (operant conditioning)
Pavlov
The systematic treatment of behavior begins with reflexes and respondent conditioning
Pavlov studied the way in which stimuli that did not elicit reflex responses could be brought to do so by being paired with the unconditioned stimuli for such responses
Skinner
Skinner systematically used elicitation to refer to the effects of both unconditioned and conditioned stimuli
Presentation of the conditioned elicitor by itself leads to a decrease in its effectiveness as an elicitor (extinction)
**It is only the controlling relation between independent variable and behavior that can be identified as respondent or operant, not the behavior alone
Immediacy of reinforcement is important
Events that are delayed more than a few seconds after the response do not directly increase its future frequency
Operant Conditioning
Response and the reinforcing consequences
(1) Stimulus situation
(2) Behavior
(3) Environmental consequences (reinforcement) show an increased future frequency of occurrence in the same or similar stimulus situation
(4) Motivation
。 Stimulus → Response → Reinforcement + Motivation
Motivation
Motivation in behavior analysis refers to:
- Change in what functions as effective reinforcement
- Change in the relative strengths of different parts of the organism’s repertoire
Respondent vs. Operant Extinction
Respondent extinction =
CS is presented w/out being paired with US
*No aspect of the procedure requires any responding
Operant extinction =
Response that was reinforced must occur in the relevant stimulus situation w/out reinforcement
Operant Reinforcers
Unconditioned reinforcers = when some events function as reinforcement
Conditioned reinforcers =
Stimulus changes acquire their capacity to reinforce behavior by being systematically related to other reinforcing events
*Increases future response frequency when it is used as the consequence of a response
Positive reinforcers = They strengthen by being immediately presented
Negative reinforcers = They strengthen by being immediately removed following the response
*highly desirable as it is always good to have bad things terminated or removed.
Skinner’s methodology
- Main dependent variable was rate of response
- Each subject was exposed to all values of the independent variable and only a few subjects studied
- No use made of statistical inference
- Research was NOT construed as a test of a theory
Periodic reconditioning
Fixed Interval schedule of reinforcement
- First response following a fixed time period from the last reinforced response is reinforced
- This also starts another fixed time period
Behavior is not only sensitive to whether it is reinforced or not, but also sensitive to the arrangement of reinforcement in combination with requirements or contingencies involving:
- time
- number of responses
- the presence of stimuli
Aversive stimuli
Negative Reinforcement
The reinforcement of behavior by the termination of environmental events [aversive stimuli] which when presented would function as punishment
Escape vs Avoidance
Escape: When the response terminates an UNCONDITIONED aversive stimulus
e.g. fear
Avoidance: It terminates a warning stimulus that has become a CONDITIONED aversive stimulus due to its relation to the onset of the unconditioned aversive stimulus
e.g anxiety
Molar vs. Molecular Interpretation of Reinforcement
Molar interpretation of reinforcement = Decreased frequency of aversive stimuli that results even if there is no immediate reinforcement
Molecular interpretation = Stimuli resulting from the lever pressing behavior itself are the reinforcement in that they are never followed immediately by shock as contrasted with the stimuli they replace
Rate of Response
Only direct reflection of response probability which was the basic concern of the science of behavior
Verbal behavior
Behavior which achieves its effect on the world through the mediation of someone else’s behavior
e.g. asking/telling someone to do something
Nonverbal behavior of reaching for an object is reinforced by tactile contact with the object
Verbal behavior of asking for the object is only reinforced with the object if there is someone available who responds to the request