mgmt 340 final Flashcards
Conflict
process where 1 party perceives that another party has or about to negatively affected something
Traditional View of Conflict
- assumed all was bad and to be avoided
- viewed negatively and discussed using terms of: violence, destruction, and irrationality
- conflict results from:
1) poor communication
2) lack of openness and trus t
3) failure of managers responsibility to the needs of team
Interactionist view of conflict
- w out conflict: peace, tranquility, and cooperative group is prone to becoming apathetic and unresponsive to needs for change and innovation
- not all conflicts are good:
1) funcitional, constructive conflict support goals
2. dysfunctional/destructive conflict hinder group performance
Task conflict
Disagreement about goals and content about specific projects
- relates to positve outcome WHEN members share goals and have high trust levels
- conflict transformations:
1. task conflicts can escalate into relationship conflicts
relationship conflict
focuses on interpersonal relationships (personality clashes)
- can be positive BUT.. relationship conflicts are not productive and produce stress
process conflict
relates to how the work gets done
optimizing conflicts
- find ways to maximize the positive benefits on conflict
- too little conflict = disruptive/poor performance
- optimum level of conflict = constructive debate, improve decisions, high performance
- too much = apathy, poor performance
The Managed Conflict View
Researchers started to focus more on managing the whole context in which conflicts occur, both before and after behavioral stage of conflict occurs
- manage conflict process
- select appropriate conflict management style
The Conflict Process Stages
Stages:
1. potential opposition or incompatibility
- communications, structure, personal variables
2. cognition and personalization
- perceived and felt conflicts
3. intentions
- such as conflict in handling intentions
4. behaviors
- overt conflicts
5. outcomes
- increase or decrease performance
Conflict management styles
- competing (assertive and uncooperative)
- avoiding (unassertive n uncooperative)
- collaboration (assertive cooperative)
- accommodating (unassertive and cooperative)
Problem solving
(conflict-resolution techniques)
identify and resolve the problem through open discussion
superordinate goals
(conflict-resolution techniques)
creating shared goals that cannot be attained w out cooperation of each conflicting parties
Expansion of resources
(conflict-resolution techniques)
conflict caused by scarcity of resources (money, bonus, promotions)
resolve by expaning resources to create win-win solution
avoidance
(conflict-resolution techniques)
withdraw from conflict
smoothing
(conflict-resolution techniques)
playing down differences while emphasizing common interest
compromise
(conflict-resolution techniques)
each party give up something
authoritative command
(conflict-resolution techniques)
management use formal authority to resolve conflicts and communicates its desires to party involved
altering human variable
(conflict-resolution techniques)
using behavioral change techniques such as human relation training to alter attitudes and behaviors that cause conflict
altering structural variable
(conflict-resolution techniques)
changing firm structure and interaction patterns of conflicting parties though job redesign, transfers, and creation of coordinating positions
communication
(conflict-stimulation techniques)
use ambiguous or threatening messages to increase conflict levels
bringing in outsiders
(conflict-stimulation techniques)
adding a person whose backgrounds, values, attitudes, or managerial styles differ from those in group
restructuring the organization
(conflict-stimulation techniques)
realigning work groups, altering rules and regulations, increasing interdeoendence, and making similar structural changes to disrupt status quo
appointing a devil’s advocate
(conflict-stimulation techniques)
designating a critic to purposely argue against the majority positions held by the group
negotiation
process where 2 or more parties exchange goods or services and attempt to agree upon the exchange rate
Distributive bargaining
parties compete for a fixed amount of resources where one side’s gain is the other side’s loss
Goal: get as much pie as possible
motivation: win - lose
focus: positions
interest: opposed
info sharing: low
relationship duration: short term
integrative bargaining
work together to find a win win solution
Goal: expand the pie so both parties are satisfied
motivation: win - win
focus: common interests
interest: congruent
info sharing: high
relationship duration: long term
BATNA (best alternative to negotiations agreement)
what each party would do if negotiations fail or reach an impasse
reservation price/resistance point
the most the party is willing to give or the least is willing to take
target point
what the party wants to achieve
first offers
anchoring bias
bargaining zone
range between one party’s minimum reservation point and the other max res point
5 step negotiation process
- preparation and planning
- definition of ground rules
- clarification and justification
- bargaining and problem solving
- closure and implementation
fixed pie myth
(negotiation pitfall)
pie can be expanded
escalating commitment
(negotiation pitfall)
taking a stand forces sticking to it
- self discipline is needed
overconfidence
(neigosciation pitfall)
always try to understand the merits of the other person position as well
too much telling and not enough active listening
(negotiation pitfall)
seek to understood, but also to understand
leadership
ability to influence a group to achieve a goal or vision
influence process
process to influence ppl to understand and agree what needs to be done and how to do it
leaders vs managers
leaders: challenge status quo, create visions, and inspire members
managers, formulate detailed plans, create structures, oversee day-to-day operations
Successful leader: traits
- assume personality play central roles
- focus on personal qualities and characteristics
- organize traits around Big 5 personality framework
- include great person theory and emotional intelligence
great person theory
leaders possess special traits that set them aside from others
- special traits give power and authority
successful leaders: behavioral / the ohio state studies
2 behaviors
1. initiating structure
2. consideration
1st behavior of successful leaders
initiating structure
- leader is likely to define and structure their roles and employees
2nd behavior of successful leaders
considerations
- extent where a person job relationship are characterized by mutual trust, respect, and regard for their feelings
University of Michigan study 2 behavioral dimension
- employee-oriented leaders
- production-oriented leader
employee-oriented leader
emphasize interpersonal relationship by taking personal interest in employees needs
production-oriented leader
emphasizes the technical or task aspects of the job, focus on achieving task
transactional leaders
leaders who guide or motivate employees to achieve goals by clarifying role and task
transformational leadership
inspire ppl to transcend their own self interests and leader is capable of having profound effects on followers
transactional leader characteristics
- contingent rewards
- management by exception (active)
- management by exception (passive)
- laissez- faire
contingent reward
exchange rewards for effort
management by exception (active)
watches and searches for deviations from rules and standards, take corrective actions
management by exception (passive)
intervenes only if standards are not met