Methodology: Twin Studies + Brendgen (2005) Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Define ‘monozygotic twins’.

A

Identical twins who share 100% of their DNA due to coming from the same egg.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define ‘dizygotic twins’.

A

Non-identical twins who share 50% of their DNA due to coming from different eggs like siblings but being born at same time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define ‘concordance rate’.

A

The probability of one twin sharing a certain characteristic of the other twin.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Which set of twins will have a higher concordance rate if a behaviour is due to nature?

A

Monozygotic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Describe a twin study.

A
  • A behaviour present in one twin will be tested for its presence in the other twin
  • The concordance rating will determine the probability of the behaviour being genetic by how high it is
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What methods may a twin study use?

A
  • DNA sampling
  • Questionnaires
  • Interviews
  • Psychometric testing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

List 3 strengths of twin studies.

A

1) High reliability due to using scientific methods such as DNA sequencing which provides objective quant data
2) High reliability due to the number of multiple births are increasing so can replicate easily
3) High internal validity due to MZ and DZ twins sharing the same environment whereby there is a natural control over extraneous variables of each

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

List 4 weaknesses of twin studies.

A

1) Low generalisability as MZ twins may not be representative of other twins in a different environment
2) Low reliability as there are environmental differences between MZ and DZ twins may be hard to compare
3) Low reliability as one twin of an MZ pair may be exposed to different environmental triggers for one gene
4) Low validity due to MZ twins being identical therefore treated more alike which may lead to researcher bias in their concordance rate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Identify a twin study.

A

Brendgen (2005)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Describe the aims of Brendgen (2005).

A
  • To investigate whether social aggression could be caused by genes or the environment
  • To investigate whether social aggression shared the same cause as physical aggression
  • To investigate whether one type of aggression leads to another type
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Describe the procedure of Brendgen (2005).

A
  • Gathered data on 94 MZ and 140 DZ twins longitudinally at 5, 8, 30, 48, and 60 months and again at 6 years
  • Consisted of teacher and pupil ratings on their physical and social aggression
  • Teachers filled out the ‘Preschool Social Behaviour Scale’ and the ‘Direct and Indirect Aggression Scale’ agreeing with statements like “tries to get others to dislike a child”
  • Pupils circled pictures of their classmates from a photobook who fit the 4 different behaviour descriptors, such as “hits and kicks”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Describe the results of Brendgen (2005).

A
  • There was a higher correlation between the ratings of MZ twin pairs on physical aggression than DZ twins
  • Scores for social aggression were roughly equally correlated in MZ and DZ twins
  • Physical aggression may lead to social aggression, but not the other way around due to nature
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Describe the conclusion of Brendgen (2005).

A
  • There is a genetic component to physical aggression but not social aggression, which is more likely to be due to the environment
  • Children who were physically aggressive were also more likely to display social aggression
  • As children grow, they tend to become more socially aggressive because of social conventions on physical violence and developing different ways to express it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Evaluate the generalisablity using a high and low point.

A

P - High
E - A large sample size of 234 twin pairs
E - This sample is large enough to account for ppt variables in the target population of twins
P - Low
E - The age group being studied is ethnocentric due to being from Quebec and only goes up to 6 years
E - This will not represent other ages (such as adults) or other cultures and their differing environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Evaluate the reliability using a high and low point.

A

P - High
E - Gathered quantitative data from the teacher and peer ratings using a closed-answer questionnaire and a photo book
E - This therefore means they can be objectively compared easily if replicated
P - Low
E - The allocation of whether twins were MZ or DZ was based purely on observation of appearance
E - This would mean there may be inconsistencies with who were correctly and incorrectly identified as MZ or DZ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Are there any applications?

A

P - Yes
E - If social aggression is likely to be due to environmental factors then it might be possible to reduce it in young children
E - Due to it being used as an early indicator for problematic behaviour in the future, teachers could use reward charts to reduce the level of aggression/undesirable behaviour

17
Q

Evaluate the validity using a high and low point.

A

P - High
E - Ratings of twins by peers and teachers were done in the spring term
E - This suggests that results would be more credible due to being more familiar with the twins so assessment on behaviour more valid
P - Low
E - Children may have found it difficult to differentiate between the different twins by photo, generalising one behaviour to the other by proxy
E - Therefore was not an accurate measure

18
Q

Evaluate a good and bad ethical issues.

A

P - Good
E - 88 ppts left the study at age 6
E - Showing that the right to withdraw wasn’t compromised by the pressures of staying in a longitudinal study
P - Bad
E - Children were asked to rate their peers with negative labels by circling photos of those matching 4 descriptors
E - They may cause psychological distress as the bad things could have harmful impact on friendship