Meta-ethics Flashcards

1
Q

Intuitionism

A

A view that moral statement can be known to be true or false immediately through a kind of rational intuition

However this can countered by saying that objective moral truths can’t and don’t exist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Intuitionism

Hume

A

‘Principia ethica’- Good cannot be defined

E.g the colour yellow is just a colour and cannot be argued whether or not it is good

No moral judgement can be made from that statement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Intuitionism

Pritchard

A

Moral obligations from immediate apprehensions (moths)

No need for further explanations

Objective duty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Ethical naturalism

A

(Aquinas)
Morals can be explained in natural terms, or denied and supported the observations of the natural world

Moore: ethical naturalism = bad idea

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Ethical non-naturalism

A

Bradley argues that goodness is a natural aspect of society

However this can give a narrow account of goodness

Moore: defining goodness in terms of natural facts is mistaken referring to this as a ‘naturalistic fallacy’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Emotivism

A.J. Ayer

A

Moral judgements do not function as statements but rather as expression of the writers/ speakers feelings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Emotivism

Stevenson

A

A theory of ethical language according to which moral judgement don’t state any fact, instead an expression of emotions to influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Emotivism

Criticisms

A

Kant and Natural law: says that good is innate within us and would be more in line with intuitionism to intuition however Natural law says that the good is known (real/apparent)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

‘Is - ought gap’

More

A

More: morals aren’t innate/natural, they are non-cognitive/ not-facts- have to be learnt

is-ought gap: when one makes a claim about what is ought to be that are based solely on statements about what it is

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

‘Is - ought gap’

Hume

A

Fundamentally there is a difference between morals and facts

There is no such thing as a moral fact

Conclusions are based off of evidence

Just because something is something doesn’t mean it ought to be this way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Definitions

A

Meta-ethics: the study of underlying ethical ideas or ethical language- what is the meaning of good

Moral relativism: the beliefs that there are moral facts in the same way that there are scientific facts

Moral anti-realism: the belief that moral propositions don’t refer to objective features of the world at all- no moral facts

Cultural relativism: people’s beliefs differ from culture to culture
Normative: moral facts themselves differ dependent on culture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Intuitionism

More

A

‘Good is good and that is the end of the matter’
Indefinable and good a completely simple idea

Yellow can only be known and that’s all there is to it
We don’t explain it in terms of something else
Goodness is the same; you can’t explain it any further

We have an intuitive sense of right and wrong
However one cannot prove intuition and our intuitions may be wrong
(weak position)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly