Meta analysis Flashcards

1
Q

7 steps of research for literature reviews

A

1: select research questions
2: selecting bibliographic databases
3: choosing search terms
4: applying practical screening criteria
5: applying methodological screening criteria
6: doing the review
7: synthesizing the results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

validity in meta analyses depends on

A

reviewer’s expertise
critical imagination and quality of available literature

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what step of research extends to numerical aggregation rather than having a qualitative focus

A

7 - synthesizing the results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

reasons for meta study

A

power
reliability increase
noise reduction
practical design issues in individual studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

goals of meta analysis

A

estimate population effect
each study provides estimation so not sure about true effect
explain variabiity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

steps of MA

A

1: objectives description
2: inclusion/ exclusion criteria
3: literature search
4: developing standardized protocol to evaluate quality of studies retrieved
5: coding form
6: meta analytic procedures
- pooling of study results
- testing for homogeneity of effect sizes
- selecting moderator variables
7: describe results, conclusions, limitations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

how to deal with different effect sizes

A

translational scales for different measures of effect size

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

statistical goals of meta analysis

A

estimate combined ES
estimate confidence interval around ES
- variability within and between studies (s^2 and t^2)
explain variability between studies (potential moderators)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

how do you combine effect sizes?

A

they dont have the same weight so dont average them
- instead you should give weight to larger studies and less weight to smaller ones as their evidence is less strong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

fixed effect model

A

assumes there is true effect in population and all error is sampling error

study weight: w= 1/s^2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

random effects model

A

study weight w=1/(s^2+t^2)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

are studies homogeneous

A

test with Q-statistic
- is the between study variance
if p value is smaller alpha, then heterogeneous
- but with few studies there is a power problem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

heterogeneity tests: some measures

A

t^2= estimated amount of heterogeneity (insensitive to number of studies and precision)

I^2= total heterogeneity
- not sensitive to number of studies
- not always adequate measure for heterogeneity
-suggested as criterion to go to subgroup or modertaro analysis

H^2= total variability, sampling variability
- ratio of SDof the estimated overall effect size from a random effects MA compared to SD of fixed effects MA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what bias do you have to be aware of in MA

A

publication bias
- file drawer problem
- accessibility bias
- duplication
- country/ language/ culture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

statistical procedures against publication bias

A
  • funnel plot by Eggers (plot effect sizes of studies against their precision)
  • fail safe number, add z value of amount of studies that could be missing and see if still sig
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q
A