Mergers and Aquisitions Flashcards

1
Q

Horizontal merger

A

merger of competing firms (producing close substitutes)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

vertical merger

A

merger across supply chain!! (z.B. apple buying foxcon) - kann zu mehr Effizienz führen und ist besser für economy als horizontal merger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Conglomerate merger

A

Firms who are unrelated - neither compliments nor substitutes - wie Amazon buying supermarkets etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the merger puzzle?

A

many mergers are not profitable, disappointing or even bad for the companies. Paradox! There is no economic explanation, as it is mostly not in line with the profit maximizing assumption - gewinne steigen nur in 11% der observations (Tichy, 2001)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Why do we observe merger waves? (maybe not beantwortet)

A

Stock and bond market booms and merger waves are both driven by increases in optimism in financial markets

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Why do firms merge regardless of high failure rate?

A

possible explanation is the structure of shareholders!! maybe a big shareholder also has a steak in a competing company and can increase his total profits w merger.

und Hybris!!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Can we observe market failure in merger market?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what are the empirical approaches to measure merger profitability?

A

event studies (financial econ) - abnormal reaction of stock prices around the announcement of an aquisition

outcome studies (IO) - firms economic performance and balance sheets before and after the merger

surveys of executives and case studies
(business)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What effects do mergers have on managers?

A

The threat of an aquisition can lead managers to aquire companies themselves (to be too big to be taken over), or to be highly profitable as to not be sold

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does a merger look like in the cournot framework (if market structure is given)

A

mergers are (often) unprofitable unless a very high proportion of the firms merge!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does a generalization of mergers in a linear cournot model look like? How do you calculate it

A

compute the generalized profit function for n identical firms. number of merged firms (m) must be sufficiently high in order for the merger to be profitable (for profits to be bigger than the profits of the individual firms. n/m gives the ratio.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Additional Factors for mergers (not in cournot model)

A
  1. Heterogenous firms (spacial models) - consumer loyalty is important
  2. efficiency effects (cost reduction - static: quality, variety etc., dynamic(innovation etc)
  3. effects on market structure (killer aquisitions) - can’ measure how profit would’ve turned out without merger
  4. other motives than profit maximizing (psychological, political influence etc.)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are behavioural motives for mergers?

A
  1. Hubris
  2. Herd behaviour
  3. Empire building
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is Hubris? What factors influence it?

A

Überschätzung, überoptimismus- Manager glauben sie werden besser sein als Zielfirma. - Glauben sie maximieren Profite
2: Faktoren: gender, age, experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Herden verhalten im Zusammenhang mit mergern?

A

reaction to competitors and defensive aquisitions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

empire building

A

management deviates from profit maximizing to gain personal advantages (like being the manager of a bigger firm, higher compensation, cv)

17
Q

Market for cooporate control hypothesis

A

threat of takeover & replacement constraints managers to persue own objectives other than profit maximizing

profit must be maximized at least so that market value is bigger than the value after aquisition minus the costs of aquisition! (so almost as profitable as the new owner could make it) (share value>share value after aqu - C/number of shares)

18
Q

Common ownership and consequences

A

Can lead to reduced competition
could help explain reduced output and labour and capital shares
Mergers: Profits in total increase, even if profits for merging firms decrease. shareholders might also have a stake in remaining firms! - outcome for consumer is bad

19
Q
A