Mental Model: Interviews Flashcards

1
Q

3

Moral question (e.g. do bankers deserve higher salaries)?

A
  1. Define ‘moral’, ‘deserve’ or like terms
  2. Build that into an argument (e.g. ‘deserve’ infers positive moral outcome - outcomes of bankers can be negative (e.g. profits flow to wealthy/GFC, so cannot ‘deserve’)
  3. If questioned on further morals, build that into your argument

Note: deserve =/= should

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

3

Causality (e.g. why did QE not cause inflation?)

A
  1. Define and explain separate terms (how is inflation caused, what does QE do)
  2. Work logically to explain process, not missing any crucial logic steps
  3. If challenged on causlaity or given alternate reason, bring into arg (if spending went to international investors -> would get pound sterling -> not want to convert due to costs (esp in volatile time with global uncertainty) -> invest in UK business)

Don’t need answer before you start speaking (though it is good to) - interviewers can help you with your process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

3

Comparison - concept (e.g. what is of greater importance, stability or representation)

A
  1. Define different terms and explain their relevance
  2. . Try to explain why one can be factored into another (representation important for stability)
  3. When challenged, adapt to answer (e.g. extreme parties could limit informed poltical debate and thus pluralism, result in lesser total representation + undermine stability)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

4

Comparison - quantitative (e.g. is China or India the more powerful economy)

A
  1. Define concept (output + income)
  2. Redefine in quantitive terms (GNI)
  3. Focus on smaller details (whether investment concentrated)
  4. Use formula to solve this (investment x concentration weighting)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

2

Definitional - straight forward (e.g. what is blackmail?)

A
  1. Just state answer (e.g. blackmail is wrongfully and purposefully withholding the release of information about others because you gain some sort of private benefit out of it)
  2. Adapt answer in response to criticisms
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

3

Definitional - conceptual (e.g. what is purpose of electoral system?)

A
  1. Define terms individually (e.g. what is ‘system’ in political sense; what does ‘electoral’ imply)
  2. Put terms together
  3. Use to explain argument
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

5

Estimate (how would you measure level of output in economy?)

A
  1. Define what equation you need (e.g. output can be measured by GDP)
  2. Outline equation further (consumption, balance of payments, govt spending, investment)
  3. Make any important information known (e.g. consumption represents circa 60% of GDP)
  4. Estimate values for each (what does just avg household consumer per month of each income bracket, what do they earn; is the economy under a trade deficit, govt spends x amount per year)
  5. Be prepared to adapt answer (e.g. why not include taxes in govt spending - factored into things such as consumption and investment + public may not be responsive to taxes (e.g. cutting tax may result in liquidity trap)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

5

Problem solving - links (e.g. consistent sentences)

A
  1. Define concepts
  2. Look for and explain link (e.g. inconsistent and contradictory sentences)
  3. Use that to explain difference
  4. Give example
  5. Adapt answer through intellectual flexibility e.g. ‘at least’, etc
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

2

Problem solving - example (e.g. true conclusion but untrue premises)

A
  1. Use counter example (true premises + true conclusion)
  2. Switch word to make premise untrue
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

5

Game Theory

A
  1. Understand conditions - ask question if need to
  2. Test out problem
  3. Explain how rationality factors in
  4. Find right answer - keep on pushing! and KEEP ON TALKING
  5. Acknowledge that they may not be rationalism (if appr)

Note: may have to work backwards e.g. £1 auction, pirates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

4

Unseen material - explainer (e.g. chocolate)

A
  1. Establish main trend
  2. Look at axis and explain significance logically (chocolate consumption → luxury good → spending on luxury goods indicates wealth)
  3. Denote anomalies - try and explain why
  4. Adapt answers in response
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly