CT Flashcards

1
Q

4

What should you look out for in MC questions?

A
  • Look for ‘trigger’ words (so, therefore, should)
    • can be seen in both passageandanswers
  • Does rest of passage support MC?
  • Be wary of intermediate conclusions
  • Can move on once answer gotten (don’t need to test all out)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

1

If 2 MC answers are options, how do you select the correct one?

A

which answer provides reason for the other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

7

List the different types of flaw/weakness questions

A
  • Alternate explanation
  • Specific example and generalisation
  • Gap in logic
  • Equating two ideas as same thing
  • A is wrong, so B is right
  • Pre-existing relationship
  • Confusion with weakness/flaw
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

3

Describe alternate explanation (flaw/weakness)

A
  • MC - A causes B, vice versa, or some form of relationship
  • Flaw - explanation: there is outside factor (C)
  • Weakens - example of flaw (govt forced to make cuts on x)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

4

Describe specific example (flaw/weakness)

A
  • entire arg based upon specific example
  • study may be biased
  • Flaw - explanation of generalisation based upon specific example
  • Weakens - example e.g. study in x region found this not be case
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

3

Describe gap in logic (flaw/weakness)

A
  • e.g. deciding between running or swimming club. Running hurts knees. Swimming club should be chosen
  • Flaw - argument fails to take into account…
  • Weakens - swimming bad for knees
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

2

Describe equating two ideas as same thing (flaw/weakness)

A
  • interchangeably use terms e.g. punishment and imprisonment
  • often includes subjective words
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

2

Describe pre-existing relationship (flaw/weakness)

A
  • Assumes casual relationship - indeed this relationship will likely make sense
  • yet the effect may have already been present before the cause
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

3

Give an example of a pre-existing relationship (flaw/weakness)

A
  • children who do loads of english practice get higher spelling scores
  • MC: therefore to improve spelling, do loads of English practice
  • however - the children who did loads of English practice may have already had good spelling prior to doing this practice
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

2

Describe strengthen questions

A
  • First establishargumentin passage (e.g. answer strengthens in 2014 Q17)
  • makes conclusion more valid AND increases possibility of conclusion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

2

What do you look out for in strengthen questions?

A
  • Do other answers weaken rather than strengthen?
  • Which most strengthens considering argument
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

2

How do you select DC answers?

A
  • Typically combine arg and mc (or combine two different parts of passage)
  • Is there enough information in passage to support conclusion?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

4

How do you eliminate DC answers?

A
  1. go beyond the scope
  2. Not enough info to support answer
  3. Extreme language (always, never, in every case, all)
  4. Subjective wording (e.g. confuse ‘disappointment’ with ‘upset’) - make sure every word in answermatches passage
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

3

What are some important things to consider in UA questions?

A
  • Identify main conclusion
  • Focus on main arg (not sub-arg)
  • Which piece of reasoning most supports that conclusion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

1

What is a good method to test out UA answers?

A

take answer and make it negative - does argument still stand?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

3

How do you eliminate UA answers?

A
  1. Already stated?
  2. Beyond scope (too extreme)
  3. Not relevant
17
Q

4

How do you solve parallel questions?

A
  • Look for degree of certainty
  • might need to restructure passage/answer
  • positive/negative aspect is v important
  • Sometimes need more than just letters (e.g. Q13) - ‘constant’
18
Q

Principle often contained in (…) sentences

A

one or two

19
Q

1

What is essential to solving principle questions?

A
  • Use process of elimination (some may be conclusions, etc)
20
Q

2

Which factors do you need to consider in principle questions?

A
  • Relationship between actors or ideas very important
  • Look for specific words e.g. morallyentitled=/= morallyobligated