Memory- Capacity and duration Flashcards
Research and coding - Word recall of similar/dissimilar words
Baddeley: acoustic in STM, semantic in LTM
Evaluation- separate memory stores
Identified STM and LTM supporting multi-store model
Artificial stimuli
Word lists had no personal meaning
Research on capacity- Digit span
Jacobs: 9-3 digits, 7-3 letters
Span of memory and chunking
Miller: 7±2 span, putting items together extends STM capacity
Evaluation- a valid study
Later studies replicated findings (e.g. Bopp and Verhaeghen), so valid test of digit span
Not so many chunks
Miller overestimated STM, only four chunks (Cowan)
Research on duration- Duration of STM
Peterson and Peterson: about 18 seconds without rehearsal
Duration of LTM
Bahrick et al (yearbooks): face recognitions 90%, free recall 60% (15 years). Face recognition 70%, free recall 30% (48 years)
Evaluation- meaningless stimuli in STM study
Petersons used consonant syllables, lack external validity
High external validity
Bahrick et al. used meaningful materials, better recall than studies with meaningless stimuli (Shepard)