Memory Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
0
Q

Visuo-spatial scratch pad

A

Inner eye-processes and stores mental images, limited cap, independent from phonological loop

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Episodic buffer

A

Binds together (integrates) info into episodes, Lim cap, binds info from LTM with that being processed in the WM, binds LTM to form novel episodes (elephant playing hockey)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Evidence supporting wmm

A

Baddeley and hitch dual task technique- investigated if participants can use different parts of working memory at the same time- participants were asked to perform two tasks at the same time - a digit span task which required them to repeat a list of numbers, and a verbal reasoning task which required them to answer true or false to questions- As the number of digits increased in the digit span tasks, participants took only slightly longer to answer the questions which shows they were using Phon loop and cen exec.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Phonological loop

A

Inner voice and ear- ear-phonological store-allows acoustically coded items to be stores for brief periods(melodies)
Voice-articulatory control process-allows sub repetitions of items in phonological store

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Encoding

A

The way memory is stored-acoustically, semantically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Central executive

A

Decision making and problem solving, controls attention, processes (synthesises) info, lim cap, can do lim amount of things at once

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Capacity

A

How many memories can be stored at once

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Multi store model

A

Developed by Atkinson and Shiffrin- Consists of 3 unitary, separate stores; sensory memory, stm and ltm, information runs through these stores in a one way linear flow. Information is received by the sensory and if attended to it will be processed into stm (or disappear). If it is then rehearsed it will be passed on to the LTM (or lost) where it can be stored for a lifetime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

STM

A

Duration- 30 seconds, capacity- 7+- 2 memories, encoding- acoustically -can be lost through decay or displacement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

duration

A

How long a memory lasts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

LTM

A

Duration and Capacity- unlimited, encoding- semantically can be lost through interference or retrieval failure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

MSM strengths

A

It distinguishes between STM and LTM in terms of capacity, duration and encoding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

MSM weaknesses

A

SOAR-
Simple- It assumes a single STM or LTM however other types have been identified.
Other memory models- The WMM has cast doubt upon the MSM idea of STM being
Artificial- Much of it’s supporting evidence comes from lab studies which lack mundane realism
Rehearsal- In daily life people devote very little to active rehearsal but they can still put info into LTM.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Further Evidence supporting wmm

A

Brain scans have shown that different areas of the brain area activated when verbal or visuo-spatial tasks are carried out, supporting the existence of different stores existing in short term memory, since the different stores are contained in different parts of the brain.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

wmm limitations

A

Can’t account for smell, taste or touch, the central executive- remains unclear how it works- does it deal with things the phon and vis don’t, doesn’t look at the link between LTM and working memory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

EWT

A

An eye-witness can be someone who observes an event, such as a crime or car crash, from distance and is not directly involved, or someone directly involved with an event, research into EWT has shown that a number of factors can lead to an incorrect recollection of the facts during a testimony.

16
Q

EWT age 1

A

Anastasi and Rhodes used individuals from three age groups (18–25; 35–45; and 55–78) who were shown 24 photographs (representing the three different age groups), which they had to rate for attractiveness. After a short ‘filler’ activity, they were then presented with 48 photographs, 24 of which had been seen previously. they found that the young and middle-aged participants were more accurate than the older participants, and all age groups were more accurate in identifying photographs from their own age group.

17
Q

EWT age 2

A

Yarmey stopped 651 adults in public places and asked them to recall the physical characteristics of a young woman to whom they had spoken for 15 seconds just 2 minutes earlier. Although young (18–29) and middle-aged (30–44) adults were more confident in their recall than the older (45–65) adults, there were no significant differences in the accuracy of recall that could be attributed to the age group of the witness.

18
Q

A study to see if anxiety effects later identification in EWT

A

Loftus- Participants either Overheard a discussion in a lab about an equipment failure. A person them emerged from the laboratory holding a pen in grease covered hands.
2. Overheard a heated and hostile debate between people in the lab. After the sound of breaking glass and crashing chairs. A man came out of the lab holding a paper knife covered in blood.
Participants were then asked to recall the person from 50 photos. 49% recalled pen man, 33% recalled knife man. This shows that a weapon narrows the focus of attention, resulting in less accurate peripheral details.

19
Q

A study to see if anxiety effects later identification in EWT 2

A

Loftus and burns- Participants were allocated to one of two conditions.
1. Watched a violent short film where a boy was shot in the head
or
2. Watched a non-violent short film of a crime
Participants were less accurate in recall when they saw the violent short film than those who watched the non-violent movie.

20
Q

EWT anxiety evaluation

A

Research is lab based- mundane realism, The participants in Loftus were deceived as they were led to believe it was a real situation, this it may have caused psychological harm to the participant. In addition; they did not provide fully informed consent.

21
Q

Loftus strengths

A

easily replicable as it was an experiment that maintained high control over the extraneous variables. uses a scientific method, this means that we can state that the IV effects the DV.

22
Q

EWT misleading questions study

A

To test whether the language used in eyewitness testimony can alter memory Loftus and Palmer (1974) asked people to estimate the speed of motor vehicles using different forms of questions.

23
Q

EWT misleading questions study procedure

A

150 students were shown a film which featured a car in an accident. Afterwards the students were questioned about the film. The independent variable was the type of question asked. 50 students were asked ‘how fast were the car going when they hit each other?’, another 50 ‘smashed’ and the remaining 50 participants were not asked a question at all (i.e. the control group). A week later they were asked Did you see any broken glass? There was no broken glass on the original film.

24
Q

EWT misleading questions study findings

A

Smashed: 16 saw, Hit: 7 saw, nothing: 6 saw. This research suggests that memory is easily distorted by questioning technique and information acquired after the event can merge with original memory causing inaccurate recall or reconstructive memory.

25
Q

EWT misleading questions study evaluation

A

lacked mundane realism as Participants viewed video clips rather than being present at a real life accident. Yale and cutshall found that misleading information did not alter the memory of people who had witnessed a real armed robbery. Only uses students- Population validity. However it can be replicated as it’s a lab experiment.

26
Q

Cognitive interview explanation

A

It’s clear that the way witnesses are interviewed could lead to it’s inaccuracies- Geiselmen et al developed the cognitive interview technique which has 4 principle to provide accurate witness recall.

27
Q

Cognitive interview principles

A

CONTEXT REINSTATEMENT - cognitively recalling the whole context of the event.
REPORT EVERYTHING - report every detail you can remember even if it seems trivial.
RECALL FROM CHANGED PERSPECTIVE - describe the event as it would have been seen from a different viewpoints
RECALL IN DIFFERENT ORDERS - report the event moving backwards and forwards in time.

28
Q

Cognitive interview evaluation

A

Strengths: It helps trigger the witness’s LTM for the events which improves their recall.
Weaknesses: Kebbel et al found that when british police used the C.i it was time consuming and led to a lot of incorrect recall- they also found CR and RE were more effective then CP and RO.

29
Q

Do cognitive interviews work with every type of witness

A

Geiselman found children under 6 reported incidents less accurately after a cognitive interview

30
Q

Evidence supporting cognitive interviews

A

Geiselman showed participants a simulated crime video and interviewed them with either a cognitive interview, standard police interview or an interview with an hypothesis and found C.i elicited the most info.

31
Q

Memory improvement strategy 1

A
  • Think of a place you know well, such as your own house.
  • Visualize a series of locations in the place in logical order.
  • Place each item that you want to remember at one of the locations.
  • When you want to remember the items, simply visualize the place and go through it location by location in your mind. Each item that you associated with a specific location should spring to mind as you mentally make your way through
32
Q

Memory improvement strategy 2

A

Elaborative rehearsal means ‘doing’ something with the information so it is more meaningful. An Example of how to elaborate on information include using a mind map to create meaningful links; and/or answer questions that make you think about what you have just read, and by making notes then reconstructing the notes so they are organised differently (making new links).

33
Q

ewt age 1 evaluation

A

This experiment was conducted in a lab, so lacks mundane realism and so would have affected the results. Also, individual differences would have affected the results because some of the photos may look like people you know, so recall would be better.

34
Q

ewt age 2 evaluation

A

However, it lacks reliability because it would be hard to repeat and own age bias suggests that the younger pps would have found it easier to recall the young woman, so the results would also be less valid.