memory Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Memory

A

“[Memory] is the process of retaining information after the original thing is no longer present”
(Eysenck, 2003)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Two main types of memories

A

Brief and quickly forgotten
Long-lasting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Coding

A

Format in which information is stored in the various memory stores

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Capacity

A

The amount of information that can be held in a memory store

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Duration

A

The length of time information can be held in memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did Joseph Jacobs research find in capacity of the short term memory

A

-used digit span
-How many digits the participant can read out correctly
-Jacobs found the mean span for digits across all participants to be 9.3

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is a strength of Jacobs study into capacity (A valid study)

A

-has been replicated
-the study is old and early research often lacks adequate control
-E.g confounding variables
-jacob’s findings have been confirmed by others
-This suggests that jacob’s study is a valid test of digit span in STM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What did George Miller find on capacity of the short term memory

A

-made observations of everyday practice
-noted things come in sevens
-Miller thought that the span of STM is about 7 items plus or minus 2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is a limitation of Miller’s research into capacity on the STM (not so many chunks)

A

-He may have overestimated STM capacity
-Cowan reviewed other research and concluded that the capacity of STM is only about 4 plus or minus 1
-This suggests that the lower end of miller’s estimate (5 items) is more appropriate than 7 items

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What research did peterson and peterson conduct on duration of the STM

A

-tested 24 students
-given consonant syllable (YCG) to remember)
-Had to count backwards to prevent mental rehearsal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Who conducted research on coding

A

Baddeley

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What research did Bahrick conduct on duration of LTM

A

-studied 392 American participants
-High school yearbooks were obtained
-Tested participants recall in 2 ways.
-Free recall: remembering information without any aid
-photo recognition: remembering information with the aid of photos

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What did research by bahrick conclude about duration of LTM

A

-Participants tested within 15 years of graduation had 90% accuracy in photo recognition
-after 48 years recall declined to 70%
-Free recall was less accurate will 60% recalling after 15 years and only 30% after 48 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does bahrick’s research suggest about the duration of LTM?

A

LTM may last a life time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is a strength of Baddeley’s research (separate memory stores)

A

-Identifies a clear difference between two memory stores
-later research shows that there are some exceptions to Baddeley’s findings
-Idea that STM uses mostly acoustic coding and LTM mostly semantic has stood the test of time
-This was an important step in our understanding of the memory system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is a limitation of baddeley’s research (Artificial stimuli)

A

-Used quite artificial stimuli rather than meaningful material
-E.g the word lists had no personal meaning to the participants
-So Baddeley’s findings may not tell us much about coding in different kinds of memory tasks
-This suggests that the findings from this study have limited application

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Short-term memory

A

The limited-capacity memory store. In STM, coding is mainly acoustic, capacity is between 5 and 9 items and duration is about 18 seconds.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Long-term memory

A

The permanent memory store. In LTM, coding is mainly semantic, it has unlimited capacity and can store memories for up to a lifetime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What experiment did Baddeley conduct in coding

A

-Gave different lists of words to 4 groups of participants to remember
-Acoustically similar, dissimilar, semantically similar, dismillar
-Were shown the original words and asked to recall them in the correct order

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What did baddeley’s research conclude about coding

A

Information is coded acoustically in the STM and semantically in the LTM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Chunking

A

Grouping sets of digits or letters into units or chunks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What were the finding’s of Peterson and Peterson’s research

A

-After 3 second’s average recall was about 80%
-After 18 seconds it was about 3%
This suggests that the duration of the STM is 18 seconds unless we repeat the information over and over

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What is a limitation of Peterson and Peterson’s research into duration (Meaningless Stimuli)

A

-Stimuli material was artificial
-The study is not completely irrelevant because we do sometimes try to remember fairly meaningless material
-Even so, recalling consonant syllables does not reflect most everyday memory activities where what we are trying to remember is meaningful
-This means the study lacks external validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What is a strength of bahrick’s research into the duration of LTM (high external validity)

A

-Researchers investigated meaningful memories
-when studies on LTM were conducted with meaningless pictures to be remembered , recall rates were lower
-This suggests that Bahrick’s findings reflect a more ‘real’ estimate of the duration of LTM.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What is the process of the Multi-store model

A
  1. stimulus from the environment
  2. sensory register (iconic, echoic, other sensory stores
  3. information is only stored if attention is payed
  4. Short term memory store
  5. prolonged rehearsal to store in the long term memory
  6. response is remembering
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

How is information stored in the short term memory

A

Duration: 18 seconds with no rehearsal
Capacity: 5-9 items
Coding: mainly stored acoustically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

How is information stored in the long term memory

A

Duration: lifetime/infinite
Capacity: unlimited
Coding: mainly semantically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What is the Sensory register

A

The memory stores for each of our five senses, such as vision (iconic store) and hearing (echoic store)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

What is a strength of the Multi-store model of memory (research support)

A

-Studies show that the STM and LTM are different
-Baddeley (1966) found that we tend to mix up similar sounding world when using our STM, but similar meaning words when using LTM
-Further support in studies on capacity and duration
-These studies show that STM and LTM are separate and independent memory stores

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

What is a limitation of the Multi-store model of memory (Elaborative rehearsal)

A

-prolonged rehearsal is not needed to transfer to LTM
-Craik and Watkins found that the type of rehearsal is more important than the amount
-Elaborative rehearsal is needed for long-term storage and this occurs when you link the information to existing knowledge or think about what it means
-This suggests that the MSM does not fully explain how long-term storage is achieved

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

What is a limitation of the Multi-store model of memory (More than one STM store)

A

-Shallice and Warrington studied a client they referred to as KF who had amnesia
-KF’s STM for digits was poor when they were read out loud to him but his recall was better when he read the digits to himself.
-Further study of KF showed that there could even be another Short term store for non-verbal sounds
-This evidence suggests that the MSM is wrong in claiming there is just one STM store processing different types of information.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

What is a counterpoint to research support for the multi-store model

A

-Studies that support MSM used information that was not meaningful.
-They used digits,letters and sometimes words.
-This means that the MSM may not be a valid model of how memory works in our everyday lives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

What is the Multi-store model

A

A representation of how memory works in terms of three stores called the sensory register, short term memory and long term memory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

How is information stored in the sensory register

A

Duration: less than half a second
Capacity: very high
Coding: store depends on format

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

How is information passed on from the sensory register

A

By paying attention to it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Who came up with the Multi-store model of memory

A

Atkinson and Shiffrin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Maintenance rehearsal

A

We repeat material to ourselves over and over again which keeps it in the STM. If it’s rehearsed long enough it will pass onto the LTM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

Retrieval

A

Recalling information from the LTM into the STM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

What are the 3 types of long term memory

A

Episodic
Semantic
Procedural

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

Who came up with the types of Long term memory

A

Tulving (1985) realised that the MSM view of LTM was too simple and there must be multiple stores for different types of LTM.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

What is a strength of the types of memory stores (clinical evidence)

A

-Evidence from case studies of HM and clive wearing
-episodic memory in both men was severely impaired due to brain damage
-but their semantic memory and procedural memory was intact
-Still understood the meaning of words
-Didn’t recall stroking a dog half an hour ago but didn’t need to have the concept of a dog explained to him
-This evidence supports Tulving’s view that there are different memory stores in LTM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

What is a counterpoint of clinical evidence

A

-Studying people with brain injuries can help researchers understand memory
-Lack control variables
-The brain injuries experiences were usually unexpected
-Researcher had no way of controlling what happened to the participant before or during the injury
- no knowledge of the individuals memory before the injury
-This lack of control limits what clinical studies can tell us about different types of LTM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

What is a limitation of the types of memory stores (conflicting neuroimaging evidence)

A

-conflicting research findings linking types of LTM to areas of the brain
-Buckner and Petersen reviewed evidence regarding the location of semantic and episodic memory.
-Concluded semantic memory is located in the left side of the prefrontal cortex and episodic is on the right
-Other researchers found that the left prefrontal cortex is linked to encoding of episodic memory and the right with episodic retrieval
-This challenges any neurophysiological evidence to support types of memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

What is a strength of the types of memory (real world application)

A

-Allows psychologists to help people with memory problems
-E.g as people age they experience memory loss. But research has shown this seems to be specific to the episodic memory
-Belleville derived an intervention to improve episodic memory in older people by training participants on a episodic memory test.
-This shows that distinguishing between types of LTM enables specific treatments to be developed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

Episodic memeory

A

A long term memory store for personal events. It includes memories of when the events occured and of the people, objects, places and behaviours involved. memories from this store have to be retrieved consciously and with effort.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

Semantic memory

A

A long term memory store for our knowledge of the world. This includes facts and our knowledge of what words and concepts mean. These memories usually also need to be recalled deliberately

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

Procedural memory

A

A long term memory store for our knowledge of how to do things. This includes our memories of learned skills. We usually recall these memories without making conscious or deliberate effort.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

The working memory model

A

A representation of short-term memory. It suggests that STM is a dynamic processor of different types of information using subunits co-ordinated by a central decision-making system.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

Central Executive

A

The component of the WMM that co-ordinate’s the activities of the three subsystems in memory. It also allocates processing resources to those activities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

Phonological Loop

A

The component of the WMM that processes information in terms of sound. This includes both written and spoken material. It’s divided into the phonological store and articulatory process.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

The Phonological Store

A

The “Inner Ear”
Stores words you hear

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
52
Q

The Articulatory Process

A

The “Inner Voice”
-Allows maintenance rehearsal to keep information in working memory.
-Capacity of about 2 seconds’ worth of sounds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
53
Q

The Visuo-Spatial Sketchpad

A

The component of the WMM that processes visual and spatial information in a mental space often called our ‘inner eye’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
54
Q

What was the VSS subdivided into

A
  • The Visual Cache
    Stores visual data (e.g. form and colour)
  • The Inner Scribe
    Records the arrangement of objects in the visual field.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
55
Q

The Episodic Buffer (later addition)

A

The component of the WMM that brings together material from the other subsystems into a single memory rather than separate strands. It also provides a bridge between working memory and long-term memory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
56
Q

What is strength of the working memory model (clinical evidence)

A

-support from Tim Shallice and Elizabeth Warrington’s (1970) case study of patient KF.
-KF had poor STM ability for auditory (sound) information but could process visual information normally.
-For instance his immediate recall of letters and digits was better when he read them (visual) than when they were read to him (acoustic).
-KF’s phonological loop was damaged but his visuo-spatial sketchpad was intact.
-This finding strongly supports the existence of separate visual and acoustic memory stores.

57
Q

What is a counterpoint to clinical evidence of the working memory model

A

-it is unclear whether KF had other cognitive impairments (apart from damage to his phonological loop)
-might have affected his performance on memory tasks. -E.g, his injury was caused by a motorcycle accident. The trauma involved may have affected his cognitive performance quite apart from any brain injury.
-This challenges evidence that comes from clinical studies of people with brain injuries that may have affected many different systems.

58
Q

What is a strength of the working memory model (dual-task performance)

A

-studies of dual-task performance support the separate existence of the visuo-spatial sketchpad.
-Baddeley et al’s (1975) participants carried out a visual and verbal task at the same time (dual task), their performance on each was similar to when they carried out the tasks separately. But when both tasks were visual (or both were verbal), performance on both declined substantially.
-This is because both visual tasks compete for the same subsystem, whereas there is no competition when performing a verbal and visual task together
-This shows there must be a separate subsystem (the VSS) that processes visual input (and one for verbal processing, the PL).

59
Q

What is a limitation of the working memory model (nature of the central executive)

A

-lack of clarity of the central executive (CE)
-Baddeley (2003) himself recognised this when he said, ‘The central executive is the most important but the least understood component of working memory”
-The CE needs to be more clearly specified than just being simply ‘attention’ For example, some psychologists believe the CE may consist of separate subcomponents.
This means that the CE is an unsatisfactory component and this challenges the integrity of the WMM.

60
Q

Who developed the Working memory model

A

Baddeley and Hitch

61
Q

What are the roles of the central executive

A

-Monitors incoming data
-divides our limited attention
-allocates subsystems to tasks

62
Q

Who divided the VSS

A

Robert Logie

63
Q

Who added the episodic buffer to the model

A

Baddeley

64
Q

Interference

A

Forgetting because one memory blocks another,causing one or both memories to be distorted or forgotten

65
Q

Proactive interference

A

Forgetting occurs when older memories, already stored disrupt the recall of newer memories. The degree of forgetting is greater when the memories are similar

66
Q

Retroactive interference

A

Forgetting occurs when newer memories disrupt the recall of older memories already stored. The degree of forgetting is again greater when the memories are similar

67
Q

What type of memory is interference a explanation of forgetting for

A

Long term memory

68
Q

What is the procedure of research into effects of similarity

A

Studies retroactive interference by getting participants to learn a list of 10 words until they could remember them with 100% accuracy and then learning a new list. There were six groups, who had to learn different types of words (synonyms, antonyms, three digit numbers)

69
Q

What were the results of effects of similarity (McGeoch and McDonald)

A

When participants were asked to recall the original list of words, the most similar materials (synonyms) produced the worst recall. Showing that inference is strongest when the memories are similar

70
Q

Why does similarity affect recall?

A

Two possible reasons:
Proactive interference – previously stored information makes new similar information more difficult to store.
Retroactive interference – new information overwrites similar memories due to similarity.

71
Q

What is a strength of interference (real-world interference)

A

-Evidence of interference effects in everyday situations
-Baddley & Hitch (1977) asked Rugby Players to remember who they played against.
-Players had played different numbers of games over the season due to injury
-Players who had played the most games had the poorest recall
-Increases the validity of the theory

72
Q

What is a counterpoint of real-world interference

A

-interference may cause some forgetting in everyday situations but is unusual
-Conditions necessary for interference to occur are relatively rare
-Unlike lab studies where the high degree of control means a researcher can create ideal conditions for interference
-Suggests that most forgetting may be better explained by other theories such as retrieval failure due to lack of cues.

73
Q

What is a limitation of interference (interference and cues)

A

-Interference is temporary and can be overcome using cues.
-Tulving & Psotka (1971) gave participants lists of words in different categories.
-Recall of first list ~70%. Became progressively worse for each new list they learnt
-When a cue (name of category) was given, recall for later lists rose to ~70%.
- This shows that interference causes a temporary loss of accessibility to material that is still in the LTM

74
Q

What is another strength of interference (support from drug studies)

A

-Evidence of retrograde facilitation
-Coenen & van Luijtelaar (1997) gave participants a list of words and later asked them to recall the list
-Found when the list of words was learned under the influence of diazepam recall one week later was poor
-but when learnt one week before recall was better (improved recall of material learned beforehand)
-This finding shows that forgetting can be due to interference- reduce the interference and reduce the forgetting

75
Q

Who researched the effects of similarity

A

McGeoch and Mcdonald

76
Q

Outline retroactive interference as an explanation for forgetting. (3 marks)

A
  • retroactive interference is where a newer memory disrupts an older memory: the older information is forgotten
  • retroactive interference is greater when the two lots of information are similar
  • retroactive interference is less likely to occur when there is a gap between the instances of learning.
77
Q

Retrieval

A

Recall of information previously stored in memory.

78
Q

Cues

A

a trigger of information that allows us to access a memory. Such cues may be meaningful or may be indirectly linked by being encoded at the time of learning

79
Q

How can forgetting occur ?

A

Forgetting may be due to insufficient cues at the time of recall.
i.e. the memory has been stored, but you don’t have the right cues to access it again.

80
Q

What is encoding specificity principle

A

Tulving found a consistent pattern:
For a cue to be helpful, it has to be present at encoding (ie learning) and retrieval (ie recall).
Cues are encoded at the time of learning.
They can be meaningful (linked to the information being remembered) or indirect.

81
Q

Context-dependent forgetting

A

Recall depends on external cues
(Weather, sounds, smell)

82
Q

State- dependent forgetting

A

Recall depends on internal cues
(Feeling upset, being drunk)

83
Q

What is the procedure of research into context-dependent forgetting
Godden & Baddeley (1975)

A

studied deep-sea divers to see how learning on land affected work under water.
Divers learned a list of words on land or underwater, then had to recall on land or underwater.

84
Q

What were the findings of research into context-dependent forgetting

A

Accurate recall was 40% lower when learning and recall conditions did not match.

85
Q

What was the procedure of research into state-dependent forgetting

A

Gave participants antihistamine drugs – produced a slightly drowsy state (different to ‘normal’ state).
Participants had to learn lists of words and prose passages, then recall them, in one of the two states.

86
Q

What were the findings of research into state dependent forgetting

A

When the state during learning was different to the state during recall, recall was significantly worse.

87
Q

What is a strength of retrieval failure ? (real world application)

A

-Retrieval cues can help recall in real world situations.
-Baddeley suggests although the effect of cues on forgetting is not very strong, they are still worth paying attention to.
-e.g. you go to collect something from another room, but when you get there you have forgotten what.
Then if you go back to the room you were in, you remember straight away.
-This shows how research can remind us of strategies we use in the real world to improve our recall

88
Q

What is a strength of retrieval failure? (research support)

A

-A range of evidence supports retrieval failure as an explanation of forgetting.
-Godden & Baddeley (1975) and Carter & Cassaday (1998) are just two examples as they show that a lack of relevant cues at recall can lead to forgetting
-Eysenck & Keane (2010) argue retrieval failure may be the most significant cause of forgetting in LTM.
-This evidence shows retrieval failure occurs in real world situations as well as highly-controlled lab studies.

89
Q

What is a counterpoint of research support to?

A

-Baddeley argues effect of retrieval cues on forgetting is not that strong.
-Contexts have to be very different (e.g. land vs underwater) before an effect is seen.
-Learning in one room and recalling in another is unlikely to have a strong effect because the environments aren’t different enough
-This means retrieval failure due to a lack of context-dependent cues may not describe much forgetting in real life.

90
Q

What is a limitation of retrieval failure ? (Recall versus recognition)

A

-Effects of context-dependent cues may depend on the type of memory being tested.
-Godden & Baddeley (1980) replicated their 1975 study, but divers had to say if they recognised words read to them, rather than recalling the words themselves.
-Participants given lists of words in different categories.
-When recognition was required, there was no significant difference between the conditions.
-So context-dependent cues may be a limited explanation of forgetting when recall is required.

91
Q

Retrieval failure

A

A form of forgetting. It occurs when we don’t have the necessary cues to access memory. The memory is available but not accessible unless a suitable cue is provided

92
Q

Who developed the encoding specificity prinicple

A

Tulving

93
Q

Who researched into context- dependent forgetting

A

Godden and Baddeley

94
Q

Who researched into state dependent forgetting

A

Carter and Cassaday

95
Q

What were the four conditions of research into context -dependent forgetting

A

-learn on land-recall on land
-learn on land- recall underwater
-learn underwater- recall on land
-learn underwater- recall underwater

96
Q

what were the four conditions of recall for research into state-dependent forgetting

A

-learn on drugs-recall when on drugs
-learn on drugs-recall when not on drugs
-Learn not on drugs- recall when on drugs
-learn not on drugs-recall when not on drugs

97
Q

What were the findings of research into leading questions

A

The mean estimate for the speed was calculated for each participant group. The more violent the verb the faster the mean average was.

98
Q

What was the procedure for research into leading questions

A

45 participants watched videos of staged car accidents.
Researchers asked questions about the accident.
Participants were asked a leading question
About how fast were the cars going when they _____________ each other?

99
Q

How do leading questions affect eye witness testimony?

A

-Response-bias
Wording has no effect on the actual memory, but influences how they choose to answer.
- Substitution
Wording alters the memory of an incident. Eg participants who heard smashed more likely to report seeing broken glass

100
Q

What was the procedure for research into post event discussion

A

Pairs of participants watched videos of a crime from different perspectives - saw details the other did not.
Participants then discussed what they had seen in their pairs.

101
Q

How does post-event discussion affect eye witness testimony?

A

-Memory contamination
The memory of an event is distorted by details from others witnesses when these are combined with the original memory.
-Memory conformity
Witnesses may go along with each other to gain social acceptance or because they believe other accounts are more correct. The actual memory is unchanged, but reporting of it is affected.
-Source Monitoring
Eyewitnesses can recall information about the event, but not where it came from (their own memory of the event of from someone else’s account (known as source confusion).
The memory is distorted as the source information is lost.

102
Q

What is a strength of misleading information (Real-world application)

A

-Has important practical uses in the criminal justice system.
-The consequences of inaccurate EWT can be very serious.
-Loftus (1975) believes police officers need to be very careful about how they phrase their questions when interviewing eyewitnesses.
-Psychologists are sometimes asked to act as expert witnesses in court trials and explain the limits of EWT to juries.
-This shows that psychologists can help to improve the way the legal system works, especially by protecting innocent people from faulty convictions based on unreliable EWT.

103
Q

What is a counterpoint of real-world application

A

-However, the practical applications of EWT may be affected by issues with research.
-Loftus and Palmers’ participants watched film clips in a lab, a very different experience from witnessing a real event.
-Foster et al. (1994) point out that what eyewitnesses remember in research do not matter in the same way as in the real world (so research participants are less motivated to be accurate).
-This suggests that researchers such as Lotus are too pessimistic about the effects of misleading information - EWT may be more dependable than many studies suggest.

104
Q

What is a limitation of misleading information (evidence against substitution)

A

-EWT is more accurate for some aspects of an event than for others.
-Sutherland and Hayne (2001) showed participants a video clip. When participants were later asked misleading questions, their recall was more accurate for central details of the event than for peripheral ones. -Presumably the participants’ attention was focused on central features of the event and these memories were relatively resistant to misleading information.
-This suggests that the original memories for central details survived and were not distorted, an outcome that is not predicted by the substitution explanation.

105
Q

What is a limitation of misleading information (evidence challenging memory conformity)

A

-evidence that post-event discussion actually alters EWT.
-Skagerberg and Wright (2008) showed their participants film clips. There were two versions, e.g. a mugger’s hair was dark brown in one but light brown in the other. Participants discussed the clips in pairs, each having seen different versions. They often did not report what they had seen in the clips or what they had heard from the co-witness, but a ‘blend of the two.
-This suggests that the memory itself is distorted through contamination by misleading post-event discussion, rather than the result of memory conformity.

106
Q

eyewitness testimony

A

The ability of people to remember the details of events such as accidents and crimes which they themselves have observed. Accuracy of EWT can be affected by factors such as misleading information and anxiety

107
Q

Misleading informtion

A

Incorrect information given to an eyewitness usually after the event. It can take many forms such as leading questions and post event discussion between co-witnesses and other people

108
Q

Leading question

A

A question which because of the way its phrased suggests a certain answer.

109
Q

Post-event discussion

A

Occurs when there is more than one witness to an event. Witnesses may discuss what they have seen with co-witnesses or with other people. This may influence the accuracy of each witness’s recall of the event.

110
Q

Who researched into leading questions

A

Loftus and palmer

111
Q

Who researched post event discussion

A

Gabbert et al

112
Q

What were the findings of research into post event discussion

A

71% of participants incorrectly recalled details they had not seen (so had picked up from discussion). (For control group = 0%)

113
Q

Anxiety

A

A state of emotional and physical arousal. The emotions include having worried thoughts and feelings of tension.

114
Q

What was the procedure for research into weapon focus

A

-participants ‘waiting’ for lab study.
Low anxiety condition: witnessed man with pen and greasy hands.
High anxiety condition: witnessed man with knife and bloody hands.

115
Q

What was the procedure for anxiety having a positive effect on recall

A

-13 witnesses to a shooting in Vancouver.
Participants interviewed 4-5 months after shooting and details compared with original police interviews.
Also asked to rate stress at the time, and to report any emotional problems since.

116
Q

What is a limitation of Johnson and Scott’s study (unusualness not anxiety)

A

-May not have tested anxiety
-Pickel’s experiment,Weapons are unusual – Johnson & Scott (1976) may have been measuring this effect, rather than anxiety.
-Hair salon video featuring a handheld item:
Scissors (high anxiety, low unusualness)
Wallet (low anxiety, low unusualness)
Hand gun (high anxiety, high unusualness)
Raw chicken (low anxiety, high unusualness)
-Recall was poorer in both unusual situations.
-So J&S tell us nothing specifically about the effect of anxiety on EWT.

117
Q

What is a strength for anxiety having a positive effect on recall

A

-More support for positive effects
-Christianson & Hübinette (1993)
Interviewed 58 witnesses to bank robberies in Sweden
-Some directly involved, some indirectly involved.
-Researchers assumed those directly involved had higher anxiety.
-Recall was 75% across all witnesses.
Direct witnesses recall was even higher.
-Findings from actual crimes support the idea that anxiety does not have a negative effect on recall, and can have a positive effect.

118
Q

What is a counterpoint of the strength to support anxiety having a positive effect on recall

A

-Problems with Christianson & Hubinette (1993) research
-Length of time between robbery and interview (4-15 months)
-Researchers had no control over confounding variables in that time (e.g. post-event discussion).
-Results might be to do with these confounding variables - invalidates their support of the theory.

119
Q

What is a limitation of anxiety affecting recall (problems with inverted-U theory)

A

-Anxiety is made up of lots of factors.
-Inverted U only takes into account physical arousal.
-Other aspects of anxiety (e.g. how we think about a stressful situation) may be important.
-Inverted U might be too simplistic to explain the effects of anxiety on performance.

120
Q

Who studied weapon focus

A

Johnson and scott

121
Q

Who studied anxiety having a positive effect on recall

A

yuille and cutshall

122
Q

What is weapon focus

A

The presence of a weapon creates anxiety and leads to the focus on the weapon reducing the witnesses recall for other details

123
Q

What were the findings of research into weapons focus

A

Low anxiety: 49% could correctly identify the man from a line up.
High anxiety: 33% correctly identified the man.
Anxiety causes focus on central details – the weapon. “Tunnel theory.”

124
Q

What were the findings of research into anxiety having a positive effect on recall

A

Little change in accuracy over time.
Participants who reported highest levels of stress were most accurate (88% compared to 75% for less stressed).
Anxiety is not detrimental in a real-world situation and may be beneficial.

125
Q

Yerkes-Dodson Law

A

-lower levels of anxiety produce lower levels of recall
-memory becomes more accurate as the level of anxiety increases
-however there is an optimal level of anxiety which is the point of maximum accuracy

126
Q

What are the police interview guidelines

A

Questions should be open and not leading
Avoid encouraging guessing, it can lead to false memory
No prompting the witnesses

127
Q

Who developed the cognitive interview

A

Developed by Fisher and Gieselman (1992)

128
Q

Cognitive interview

A

A method of interviewing eyewitnesses to help them retrieve more accurate memories. It uses four main techniques all based on evidence-based psychological knowledge of human memory

129
Q

What were the four components of the cognitive interview

A

-report everything
-reinstate the context
-reverse the order
- change perspective

130
Q

What is a strength of cognitive interview (support for the effectiveness of the CI)

A
  • evidence that it works.
    -a meta-analysis by Köhnken et al. (1999) combined data from 55 studies comparing the CI (and the ECI) with the standard police interview.
    -The CI gave an average 41% increase in accurate information compared with the standard interview.
    -Only four studies in the analysis showed no difference between the types of interview.
    -This shows that the CI is an effective technique in helping witnesses to recall information that is stored in memory (available) but not immediately accessible.
131
Q

What is a counterpoint of the effectiveness of the CI

A

-Köhnken et al. also found an increase in the amount of inaccurate information recalled by participants.
-This was a particular issue in the ECI, which produced more incorrect details than the CI.
-Cognitive interviews may sacrifice quality of EWT (i.e. accuracy) in favour of quantity (amount of details).
-This means that police officers should treat eyewitness evidence from CIs/ECIs with caution.

132
Q

What is a limitation of cognitive interview (some elements may be more useful)

A

-not all of its elements are equally effective or useful.
-Milne and Bull (2002) found that each of the four techniques used alone produced more information than the standard police interview. But they also found that using a combination of report everything and reinstate the context produced better recall than any of the other elements or combination of them.
-This confirmed police officers’ suspicions that some aspects of the Cl are more useful than others.
-This casts some doubt on the credibility of the overall cognitive interview.

133
Q

What is another limitation of cognitive interview (the CI is time consuming)

A

-police officers may be reluctant to use the CI because it takes more time and training than the standard police interview.
-more time is needed to establish rapport with a witness and allow them to relax. The Cl also requires special training and many forces do not have the resources to provide more than a few hours (Kebbell and Wagstaff 1997).
-This suggests that the complete Cl as it exists is not a realistic method for police officers to use and (as in the point above) it might be better to focus on just a few key elements.

134
Q

What did report everything include

A

witnesses were encouraged to include every detail of the event even if it seemed irrelevant

135
Q

What did reinstate the context include

A

Witnesses should return to the crime scene in their mind and imagine the environment and their emotions

136
Q

What did reverse the order include

A

events should be recalled in a different order from the original sequence and this is done to prevent people reporting their expectations of how events must have happened rather than reporting the actual events.

137
Q

What did change the perspective include

A

witnesses should recall the incident from other people’s perspectives. This again is done to disrupt the effect of expectations and also the effect of schema on recall

138
Q

What is the enhanced cognitive interview

A

Fisher et al developed additional elements to the CI to focus on the social dynamic of the interactions (E.G establishing eye contact)