memory Flashcards

1
Q

proactive interference

A

forgetting occurs when older memories disrupt the recall of newer memories eg a teacher cant remember the new names of students because they’ve previously learnt too many

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

retrospective interference

A

forgetting occurs when newer memories disrupt the recall of older memories eg a teacher forgets the names of previous students because of the new names

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

sensory register

A

where info from our senses are stored. 2main stores=iconic memory (for visual info) and echoic memory (for auditory info)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

LTM-what?duration?coding?capacity?

A

the potentially permanent memory store for information that has been rehearsed
duration-unlimited
coding-semantic
capacity-unlimited

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

WMM

A

baddeley and hitch developed the WMM. it focuses specifically on the workings of STM, in response to atkinson and shiffrins MSM which was oversimplified. has 4 main components

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

central executive-capacity and coding

A

manages attention and controls info to and from the 3 slave stores
capacity-limited
coding-modality free

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

phonological loop-capacity and coding

A

deals with auditory info therefore codings acoustic
capacity-2secs worth of info
coding-acoustic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

visuo-spatial sketchpad-capacity and coding

A

stores and processes visual and/or spatial information when required
capacity-3-4 objects
coding-visual

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

episodic buffer-capacity and coding

A

a temporary store that integrates info from the other components and maintains a sense of time
capacity-limited (around 4chunks)
coding-modality free

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

STM-what? duration? coding? capacity?

A

your memory for events in the present or immediate past
duration-18-30secs
coding-acoustic
capacity-+7/-2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

STM-peterson and peterson (1959)

A

method-opp sample of 24 uni students. experimenter said consonant syllable to ppt followed by a 3digit number. immediately after ppt had to count backwards from number in 3s or 4s until told to stop. ppts then asked to recall nonsense syllable (each ppt given 2 practice trails followed by 8 trials)

findings/conclusions-ppts remembered about 90% when there was only 3sec interval and about 2% when 18sec interval-suggests whne rehearsal is prevented STM lasts 20secs at most

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

in peterson and peterson why we’re ppts made to count backwards

A

to stop the ppt rehearsing the syllable bcos rehearsal would aid recall

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

LTM-bahrick et al (1975)

A

method-392 ppts from ohio aged 17-74. high school year books obtained from ppts or directly from schools. recall tested via (1) photo recognition test-consisting of 50photos (2) free recall test-ppts recalled all names of their graduating class

findings/conclusions-ppts who were tested within 15th are of graduating=90% accurate in photo recognition, after 48 years recall declined to 70%. free recall was less good than recognition-after 15years=60% accurate, 48years=40%
-shows LTM can last very long time potentially a lifetime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

MSM model

A

developed by Atkinson and Shiffrun (1968)-representation of how memory works using three stores (sensory register, STM, LTM)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

sensory register-duration?coding? capacity?

A

duration->0.5secs
coding-iconic and echoic
capacity-very high

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

HM-MSM (what happened? why’s he used to support MSM?)

A

he became so anticipated by seizures he couldn’t work/lead a normal life so scoville offered him an experimental procedure
what happened-lost ability to form new memories, early childhood memories remained intact, couldn’t remember tasks completed eg 30mins before
support for MSM-shows LTM and STM are two distinct stores (evidence showed HMs STM was badly damaged however LTM was less badly affected=possible to suffer damage to one store and the other remain unaffected)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

KF-MSM (what happened? evaluation for MSM?)

A

involved in serious motorcycle accident leading to amnesia-shallice and warrington discovered KFs STM for digits was very poor when read out to him however recall of digits was much better when he read them himself)
what happened-within KFs STM there are visual and auditory processes which can be affected differently
evaluation-must be diff STM stores to process different types of info=STM isnt unitary and MSM doesn’t reflect this

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

types of LTM

A

semantic memory
episodic memory
procedural memory

19
Q

semantic memory

A

the conscious recall of facts that have meaning as opposed to our own life events
explicit
eg capital cities

20
Q

episodic memory

A

refers to any events that can be repaired from a persons life
explicit
eg last cinema trip you had

21
Q

procedural memory

A

describes our implicit knowledge of tasks that usually don’t require conscious recall to perform them
implicit
eg walking/riding a bike

22
Q

mcGeoch and McDonald (1931) interference study-aim,procedure,findings,conclusions

A

aim-discover whether interference is worse when memories are similar
procedure-ppts learned word list until could recall with 100% accuracy, ppts then asked to learn a second list, six groups of ppts who each learned a diff type of second list eg synonyms, unrelated words. ppts then asked to recall original list
findings-when ppts then recalled original list of words, their performance depended on nature of second list-the most sumiliar material eg synonyms produced worst recall. shows interference is strongest when memories are similar
conclusion-more similar the type of interfering material was, the less items were recalled
=stronger interference the more similar the memories were

23
Q

retrieval failure

A

form of forgetting, occurs when don’t have the necessary cues to access memory

24
Q

cue

A

trigger of info

25
encoding specificity principle
recall of info is best when there’s a large overlap between info available at time of retrieval and info in memory trace
26
context dependent forgetting
form of forgetting where recall occurs in a different external setting to coding
27
state dependent forgetting
form of forgetting where recall occurs in a different internal setting to coding eg drugs
28
tulving and pearlstone (1966) study for retrieval cues
aim-investigate importance of retrieval cues procedure-give ppts list of words to learn from various categories, ppts then asked to recall findings-those not given the category names recalled significantly less conclusion-cues are significant in recall
29
godden and baddeley (1975) study for context dependent forgetting
aim-investigate cue dependent forgetting procedure-drivers learned list of words either under water or on land-4conditions (asked to recall either on land or under, some matched and some didn’t) findings-accurate recall 40% decrease in non matching conditions. external cues available were different from ones at recall-led to ret failure conclusion-external cues available at learning help trigger memories if if also there at recall
30
carter and cassaday (1998) study for state dependent forgetting
aim-investigate state dependent forgetting procedure-antihistamine drugs given to ppts-ppts had to learn list of words and recall info when they were under influence or in normal state findings-in conditions with mismatch between internal state at learning and recall=performance on memory test was signif worse conclusion-when internal cues are absent there’s more forgetting and less recall
31
eyewitness testimony
the ability of people to remember the details of events which they’ve observed
32
what is the accuracy of EWT affected by?
misleading info | leading questions
33
what is misleading information?
incorrect info given to the eyewitness usually after the event can take the forms of leading questions and post event discussion for exampls
34
leading question
a question which suggests a certain answer eg because of the way it’s phrased
35
post event discussion
discussing what you have seen with co-witnesses etc
36
post event discussion study-gabbert et al (2003)
procedure-studied ppts in pairs, each ppt watched a video of the same crime but from a different POV so each ppt could seen elements in event that others couldn’t both pots discussed what they’d seen before individually completing test of recall found-71% ppts mistakenly recalled aspects of the event they didn’t see but picked up in discussion. corresponding figure in a control group with no discussion=0%
37
cognitive interview-what does the interviewer do? what are the 4 techniques involved?
interviewer attempts to help the witness feel relaxed and seeks to tailor their language to suit the individual 4techniques-report everything, reinstate the context, reverse the order, change perspective
38
report everything-description and reason
description-recall everything even is it’s trivial and even if don’t think it’s important reason-improve accuracy of recall all together, allows no missed out detail
39
reinstate the context-description and reason
description-reid the external and internal context reason-eliminates chances of state dependent and context depending retrieval failure acts as cues/triggers to recall
40
reverse the order-description and reason
description-recall events both forwards and backwards | reason-verify accuracy, it reveals people reporting their experience or fully lying about their experiences
41
change perspective-description and reason
description-try and recall form a different persons POV reason-promotes more holistic view of event which enhances recall disrupts the effect of expectations and schema on recall
42
the enhanced cognitive interview
fisher et al developed some addition elements of CI to focus on the social dynamics of the interaction eg interviewer needs to know when to establish eye contact
43
examples of enhancing CI
reducing witness anxiety minimising distractions getting witness to speak slowly open ended questions