memory Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

proactive interference

A

forgetting occurs when older memories disrupt the recall of newer memories eg a teacher cant remember the new names of students because they’ve previously learnt too many

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

retrospective interference

A

forgetting occurs when newer memories disrupt the recall of older memories eg a teacher forgets the names of previous students because of the new names

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

sensory register

A

where info from our senses are stored. 2main stores=iconic memory (for visual info) and echoic memory (for auditory info)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

LTM-what?duration?coding?capacity?

A

the potentially permanent memory store for information that has been rehearsed
duration-unlimited
coding-semantic
capacity-unlimited

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

WMM

A

baddeley and hitch developed the WMM. it focuses specifically on the workings of STM, in response to atkinson and shiffrins MSM which was oversimplified. has 4 main components

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

central executive-capacity and coding

A

manages attention and controls info to and from the 3 slave stores
capacity-limited
coding-modality free

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

phonological loop-capacity and coding

A

deals with auditory info therefore codings acoustic
capacity-2secs worth of info
coding-acoustic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

visuo-spatial sketchpad-capacity and coding

A

stores and processes visual and/or spatial information when required
capacity-3-4 objects
coding-visual

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

episodic buffer-capacity and coding

A

a temporary store that integrates info from the other components and maintains a sense of time
capacity-limited (around 4chunks)
coding-modality free

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

STM-what? duration? coding? capacity?

A

your memory for events in the present or immediate past
duration-18-30secs
coding-acoustic
capacity-+7/-2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

STM-peterson and peterson (1959)

A

method-opp sample of 24 uni students. experimenter said consonant syllable to ppt followed by a 3digit number. immediately after ppt had to count backwards from number in 3s or 4s until told to stop. ppts then asked to recall nonsense syllable (each ppt given 2 practice trails followed by 8 trials)

findings/conclusions-ppts remembered about 90% when there was only 3sec interval and about 2% when 18sec interval-suggests whne rehearsal is prevented STM lasts 20secs at most

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

in peterson and peterson why we’re ppts made to count backwards

A

to stop the ppt rehearsing the syllable bcos rehearsal would aid recall

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

LTM-bahrick et al (1975)

A

method-392 ppts from ohio aged 17-74. high school year books obtained from ppts or directly from schools. recall tested via (1) photo recognition test-consisting of 50photos (2) free recall test-ppts recalled all names of their graduating class

findings/conclusions-ppts who were tested within 15th are of graduating=90% accurate in photo recognition, after 48 years recall declined to 70%. free recall was less good than recognition-after 15years=60% accurate, 48years=40%
-shows LTM can last very long time potentially a lifetime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

MSM model

A

developed by Atkinson and Shiffrun (1968)-representation of how memory works using three stores (sensory register, STM, LTM)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

sensory register-duration?coding? capacity?

A

duration->0.5secs
coding-iconic and echoic
capacity-very high

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

HM-MSM (what happened? why’s he used to support MSM?)

A

he became so anticipated by seizures he couldn’t work/lead a normal life so scoville offered him an experimental procedure
what happened-lost ability to form new memories, early childhood memories remained intact, couldn’t remember tasks completed eg 30mins before
support for MSM-shows LTM and STM are two distinct stores (evidence showed HMs STM was badly damaged however LTM was less badly affected=possible to suffer damage to one store and the other remain unaffected)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

KF-MSM (what happened? evaluation for MSM?)

A

involved in serious motorcycle accident leading to amnesia-shallice and warrington discovered KFs STM for digits was very poor when read out to him however recall of digits was much better when he read them himself)
what happened-within KFs STM there are visual and auditory processes which can be affected differently
evaluation-must be diff STM stores to process different types of info=STM isnt unitary and MSM doesn’t reflect this

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

types of LTM

A

semantic memory
episodic memory
procedural memory

19
Q

semantic memory

A

the conscious recall of facts that have meaning as opposed to our own life events
explicit
eg capital cities

20
Q

episodic memory

A

refers to any events that can be repaired from a persons life
explicit
eg last cinema trip you had

21
Q

procedural memory

A

describes our implicit knowledge of tasks that usually don’t require conscious recall to perform them
implicit
eg walking/riding a bike

22
Q

mcGeoch and McDonald (1931) interference study-aim,procedure,findings,conclusions

A

aim-discover whether interference is worse when memories are similar
procedure-ppts learned word list until could recall with 100% accuracy, ppts then asked to learn a second list, six groups of ppts who each learned a diff type of second list eg synonyms, unrelated words. ppts then asked to recall original list
findings-when ppts then recalled original list of words, their performance depended on nature of second list-the most sumiliar material eg synonyms produced worst recall. shows interference is strongest when memories are similar
conclusion-more similar the type of interfering material was, the less items were recalled
=stronger interference the more similar the memories were

23
Q

retrieval failure

A

form of forgetting, occurs when don’t have the necessary cues to access memory

24
Q

cue

A

trigger of info

25
Q

encoding specificity principle

A

recall of info is best when there’s a large overlap between info available at time of retrieval and info in memory trace

26
Q

context dependent forgetting

A

form of forgetting where recall occurs in a different external setting to coding

27
Q

state dependent forgetting

A

form of forgetting where recall occurs in a different internal setting to coding eg drugs

28
Q

tulving and pearlstone (1966) study for retrieval cues

A

aim-investigate importance of retrieval cues
procedure-give ppts list of words to learn from various categories, ppts then asked to recall
findings-those not given the category names recalled significantly less
conclusion-cues are significant in recall

29
Q

godden and baddeley (1975) study for context dependent forgetting

A

aim-investigate cue dependent forgetting
procedure-drivers learned list of words either under water or on land-4conditions (asked to recall either on land or under, some matched and some didn’t)
findings-accurate recall 40% decrease in non matching conditions. external cues available were different from ones at recall-led to ret failure
conclusion-external cues available at learning help trigger memories if if also there at recall

30
Q

carter and cassaday (1998) study for state dependent forgetting

A

aim-investigate state dependent forgetting
procedure-antihistamine drugs given to ppts-ppts had to learn list of words and recall info when they were under influence or in normal state
findings-in conditions with mismatch between internal state at learning and recall=performance on memory test was signif worse
conclusion-when internal cues are absent there’s more forgetting and less recall

31
Q

eyewitness testimony

A

the ability of people to remember the details of events which they’ve observed

32
Q

what is the accuracy of EWT affected by?

A

misleading info

leading questions

33
Q

what is misleading information?

A

incorrect info given to the eyewitness usually after the event
can take the forms of leading questions and post event discussion for exampls

34
Q

leading question

A

a question which suggests a certain answer eg because of the way it’s phrased

35
Q

post event discussion

A

discussing what you have seen with co-witnesses etc

36
Q

post event discussion study-gabbert et al (2003)

A

procedure-studied ppts in pairs, each ppt watched a video of the same crime but from a different POV so each ppt could seen elements in event that others couldn’t
both pots discussed what they’d seen before individually completing test of recall
found-71% ppts mistakenly recalled aspects of the event they didn’t see but picked up in discussion. corresponding figure in a control group with no discussion=0%

37
Q

cognitive interview-what does the interviewer do? what are the 4 techniques involved?

A

interviewer attempts to help the witness feel relaxed and seeks to tailor their language to suit the individual
4techniques-report everything, reinstate the context, reverse the order, change perspective

38
Q

report everything-description and reason

A

description-recall everything even is it’s trivial and even if don’t think it’s important
reason-improve accuracy of recall all together, allows no missed out detail

39
Q

reinstate the context-description and reason

A

description-reid the external and internal context
reason-eliminates chances of state dependent and context depending retrieval failure
acts as cues/triggers to recall

40
Q

reverse the order-description and reason

A

description-recall events both forwards and backwards

reason-verify accuracy, it reveals people reporting their experience or fully lying about their experiences

41
Q

change perspective-description and reason

A

description-try and recall form a different persons POV
reason-promotes more holistic view of event which enhances recall
disrupts the effect of expectations and schema on recall

42
Q

the enhanced cognitive interview

A

fisher et al developed some addition elements of CI to focus on the social dynamics of the interaction eg interviewer needs to know when to establish eye contact

43
Q

examples of enhancing CI

A

reducing witness anxiety
minimising distractions
getting witness to speak slowly
open ended questions