MEMORIZE PEDS Flashcards
genetic disorder W/U
multidisciplinary care including peds, PT/Ot, genetics, counselling and family planning.
W/U: CBC, ext lytes, Cr/Urea, ALP, TSH, T3, T4, urinalysis for complex sugars, skeletal survey for MED/dysplasia, 3ft standing spine film
peds abuse schpeel
1 I will perform a full history investigating the presenting complaint as well as red flags of
non-accidental injury
a History of MSK injuries
b Inconsistencies of the mechanism
c Delay to treatment, or history of delay to treatment
d Review the chart for previous admissions
2 I will do a thorough head to toe examination looking for associated injuries
a Looking for bruising or bruising of different ages
b Tenderness over the ribs/posterolateral ribs
c Deformities
d Burns
e Perineum
3 I will notify child services (CAS)
a Let the family know that CAS has been contacted
b Ensure immediate safety of the child
c Protect any children in the home environment that are not present
DDx for LLD
Physeal disruption
a trauma
b infection
c tumor
d Extraphyseal vascular tumors like hemangiomas
Disorders of tone
a Spasticity and CP
b Poliomyelitis
Congenital disorders
a Dysplasias
b Hemihypertrophy
c PFFD
d DDH – high riding or dislocated hip
e Clubfoot
f fibular or tibial hemimelia
Mechanical deformity
a Spinal deformity
b pelvic obliquity
c Previous limb deformity with malunion
LLD schpeel
I would do a full history and physical to identify the location of the deformity whether it is true or apparent, deriving from the foot, tibia, femur, pelvis, spine or soft tissue contractures.
Based on my findings I would order relevant imaging including 3ft standing AP/Lateral
scannogram, with and without standing blocks.
pes ATLS protocol
- activating ATLS protocol, ensuring appropriate personnel are available, proceeding through primary and secondary surveys
- The patient will be placed on a torso pad and C spine protected in a pediatric collar for the duration of the resuscitation
- Broselow weight to length measurements will be used to estimate sizes of peripheral access lines, any necessary endotracheal tubes
- I would obtain the largest bore peripheral IV access possible given the size of the patient and have central and intraosseous lines available.
- The resuscitation will involve a thorough primary survey including ABCDE, XR of the pelvis and chest and head to toe secondary survey
flexinailing femur
- goals are to achieve anatomic reduction of the fracture site, restoring length alignment and rotation of the limb using burrried flexible intramedullary nails for 3 point fixation, totaling 80% of canal diameter
- With the patient supine I will use two retrograde flexible nails
- Starting 2-4cm proximal to the physis on fluoroscopy I’ll use an awl to enter the bone
- I’ll prebend a 30 degree C shaped curve in the flexible nail which is 40% of the canal diameter
- Obtain reduction and advance the nails past the fracture site
- Ensure length alignment rotation of the limb is restored
- 6 Ensure stable 3 point fixation
- 7 Bury and cut nails
- 8 Protected postoperative weight bearing
Difference between pediatric and adult
airway
1 Smaller airway
a ETT estimated on broselow
b More difficult laryngoscopy
2 Relatively larger tongue
a More difficult laryngoscopy
3 Floppy epiglottis
a More difficult laryngoscopy
4 Large occiput
a Requires torso pad or cut out in spine board or head is pushed into flexion
5 High anterior larynx
a More difficult laryngoscopy
Difference between pediatric and adult
circulation management
1 IV access is more difficult
2 Fluid management is weight based
a initial bolus 20ml/kg, after 2 boluses then start blood
b Blood is given 10ml/kg PRBCs
c maintenance fluids once euvolemic are based on 4:2:1 rule
3 Blood volume relatively larger but absolute volume smaller
4 Lower peripheral vascular resistance
a Compared to adults high systemic vascular resistance
5 Hypotension late sign of cardiopulmonary collapse
a Compared to adults where it is an early sign
signs of compartment syndrome in kids
3A’s analgesic requirement, anxiety, agitation
Differential diagnosis MED
1 LCP
2 SED
3 Congenital hypothyroidism
4 Mucopolysaccharidoses
5 Pseudoachondroplasia
6 Diastrophic dysplasia
Workup for patient in orthopedic clinic
with possible MED
1 Full history and physical examination
2 Skeletal survey
3 Imaging of the spine
i rule out SED
ii AAI and other C spine abnormalities
iii Any congenital deformities
4 Thyroid tests
i T3/T4/TSH
5 General pediatric medicine referral for workup
i GU ultrasound
ii ECHO
iii Urinalysis for complex sugars
6 Genetics
i sulfate transporter testing (diastrophic dysplasia)
ii PTHrP testing (pseudoachondroplasia)
iii COMP/MTN3/COL9A testing (MED)
iv COL2A testing (SED)
iv possible family counselling
7 Orthopedic care
i Identify any concerns and develop plan for ongoing care with multidisciplinary
approach
Difference between MED and SED
Spine involvement
1 Atlantoaxial instability
2 Odontoid hypoplastia or os odontodium
3 Kyphoscoliosis
4 Increased lumbar lordosis
5 Platyspondyly
6 Various vertebral body anomalies
Genetics:
1 MED associated with COMP/MATN3/COL9A
2 SED associated COL2A1
DDX LCP
Causes for AVN:
a Sickle cell
b hemoglobinopathy (Thallasemia)
c Leukemias
d Steroids
e Septic arthritis
Dysplasias:
a MED
b SED
c Mucopolysaccharide
Endocrine
a Thyroid disorder
Syndromic causes:
a Osteochondromatosis
b Maroteaux-lamy
Poor prognostic features LCP
1 Extent of head involvement
a Also extent of head involvement at fragmentation phase
i Lateral pillar and catterall classification
b Extent of subchondral bone involvement
i Salter Thompson crescent
c Decreased height of the lateral pillar
2 Age at onset > 8
3 Two or more Catterall head at risk signs
4 Premature physeal closure
Down syndrome - ortho and non-ortho features
Orthopedic (top to bottom)
a General ligamentous laxity
b C spine instability
i occipitocervical
ii atlantoaxial
c Scoliosis
d DDH
e SCFE
f Patellofemoral instability
g Pes planus
h Metatarsus primus varus
Non-orthopedic (top to bottom)
a Premature aging
b Cognitive delay
c Early onset alzheimers
d Hypothyroid
e Cardiac disease
i PFO
ii VSD
iii ASD
f Duodenal atresia (double bubble)
General operative considerations in
downs
1 Preoperative medical work up by pediatrics
a Preop ECHO
b CXR
2 Plan for higher level postoperative care
a step down
b ICU
3 C spine flex/ex views
a AAI
b OCI
4 Anesthesia consult
a Potential difficult airway
b May require awake fiberoptic intubation
5 Procedure specific considerations
Indications for C1-2 fusion in downs
syndrome
1 ADI > 5 with myelopathy
2 ADI > 10
3 PADI < 14
4 Progressive neurological decline with evidence of instability
Nonoperative follow up with ADI 5-10 no neurological complaints
a q6 month radiographs unless progression of symptoms
Femoral and acetabular deformity seen in
downs syndrome hips
Femur:
a Coxa valga (mean neck shaft 167)
b Femoral anteversion
Acetabulum:
a Decreased anteversion (relative retroversion)
b Insufficient posterior acetabular coverage
Management of unstable hip in Downs
syndrome based on phase
Children with habitual dislocation can benefit from surgical stabilization
1 Subluxation phase:
a goal is concentric reduction and correct acetabular dysplasia
2 Fixed dislocation phase:
a goal is to preserve walking ability, which may require a hip salvage procedure or total
hip arthroplasty.
Age < 2: Newborn with DDH = Pavlik harness, standard monitoring and bracing
Age 2-5: Monitoring and potential bracing
Age >5: With habitual dislocation
a. Triple innominate osteotomy and/or femoral varus derotational ostetomy
Note Isolated pelvic coverage (salter/dega/etc) osteomies have higher failure
rates than triple innominate
b. Treatment should stabilize and centralize the hip, preventing secondary acetabular
dysplasia
c. If left untreated, dislocatable hips may progress and persistent subluxation,
dislocation, and arthritis may develop
Age > 10 with subluxation:
a Pelvic osteotomy with acetabular reorientation (PAO or triple osteotomy)
Age > 10 with fixed dislocation: PAO +/- femoral ostetotomy or THA (in presence of OA)
RF DDH
1 Female
2 Feet first (breech)
3 First born
4 Family history
5 Oligohydramnios
6 Swaddling
Blocks reduction DDH hip
1 Iliopsoas tendon
a creates hourglass capsule
2 Adductors
a limits abduction
3 Inverted labrum
4 Capsule
5 Transverse acetabular ligament
6 Pulvinar
7 Ligamentum teres
8 Inverted limbus
a pathological hypertrophic fibrocartilaginous labrum
Expected radiographic features DDH
US: alpha > 60, beta < 55
XR: hip inferior helgenreiner medial perkin, continuous shenton, AI < 25 after 6 months
Pelvic and U/S radiographic lines
a Alpha angle = acetabular roof relative to ilium, reflects depth of joint
b Beta angle = labrum relative to ilium, reflects coverage of head
c Hilgenreiner = horizontal line through triaradiate cartilage
d Perkin = vertical line through lateral sourcil
Pavlik harness complications & causes x
1 Femoral nerve palsy
a Anterior straps too tight
b Hips in excessive flexion
2 Femoral head AVN
a Posterior straps too tight
b Hips in excessive abduction
3 Brachial plexopathy
a Compression by shoulder straps
4 Inferior dislocation
a Anterior straps too tight
b Hips in excessive flexion
5 Pavlik harness disease
a Ongoing use despite mal-reduction resulting in pathologic changes femoral head and
acetabulum
6 Skin breakdown
a groin and popliteal fossa
b Tight straps