MEE - Crim/Crim Pro Flashcards

1
Q

A search or seizure must be reasonable to be valid under the ___-

A

4A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Under the exclusionary rule, evidence obtained in violation of 4A is

A

inadmissible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

a police may stop a car if they have ___ to believe that a traffic violation was committed. Doesn’t matter if the traffic violation pretext has underlying alterior motive

A

probable cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Police may seize an item in plain view from a place they are legally allowed to be if the officer has immediate _____ to believe the item is contraband or evidence, instrumentalities, or fruits of a crime

A

probable cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

the officer had a right to be next to the car because the stop was ____

A

valid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

the officer had PC to belive the bag contained cocaine because of its look, suspect’s rep as a drug dealer, and suspect’s answer to the question “are those your drugs” – “no that cocaine isn’t mind”

This establishes ____

A

probable cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

With probable cause, under the automobile exception, an officer may search an automobiel without a ____

A

warrant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The supreme court requires police to issue ______ warnings before conducting police interrogation

A

Miranda

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

any statement intended to elicit an incriminating response is an ____

A

interrogation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

a person is in custody if freedom of action is ____

A

significantly restircted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Under the fruit of the poisinous tree doctrine, evidence derived from unconstitutionally seized evidence generally is ____

A

excluded

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

at issue is whether Adam has the mens rea for ____

A

involuntary manslaughter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

a person commits involiuntary manslaughter when he causes a death by ___-

A

criminal negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

A person has the mens rea of criminal negligence when he (i) fails to be aware of a ______, and (ii) this failuer constitutes a deviation from the standard of care that a reasonable person would have exercised in the same situation

A

substantial and unjustifiable risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Some states use a ____ standard for involuntary manslaughter and requrie that the person consciously disregard a substantial and unjustifiable risk

A

recklessness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

adam dropped several hundred marbles in front of two stop signs at the intersection

A
17
Q

adam told Bob that the cars would “slip on the marbles and they won’t be able to stop at stop sign”

this shows that Adam was AWARE of the _____ risk that cars might slip on the marbles and crash

A

substantial and unjustifiable risk

Adam must have also been aware that car crashes frequetnly result in injuries and death

18
Q

adam had the mens rea of recklessness b/c he was ____ that his conduct created a substantial and ______ risk of death or serious bodily injury and he consciously ____ that risk

A

aware

unjustifiable

disregarded

19
Q

Adam acted with criminal negligence because a reasonable person would have been aware that causing cars to slip at an intersection would create a substantial and injustifible risk of ____

A

sereious injury or death caused by car crashes

Therefore a jury could conclude that Adam acted with recklessness or criminal negligence

20
Q

At issue is the mens rea for second degree murder and when an intervening act will relieve a defendant from criminal liability

A

__

21
Q

in this jurisdiction, second degree murder is a killing done with a reckless indifference to an unjustifiably high risk to human life (or with the intent to ______, intent to inflict great bodily injury, or with the intent to kill without premeditation or deliberation)

A

commit a felony

22
Q

Defendant exhibited a _____ to an unjustifiably high risk to human life by pointing and shooting a rifle at a target just behind friend, given the high risk that Friend would likely be killed by such an act

A

reckless indifference

23
Q

The defendant’s act must be the _____ and the proximate cause of the victim’s death

A “but for text” is applied

A

cause in fact

24
Q

The defendant proximately causes the victim’s death when the death is a ____consequence of the defendatn’s conduct, even if he does not anticipate the precise manner in which the death occurs

A

natural and probable

25
Q

An intervening act will shield the defendant from criminal liability when the intervening act is mere _____ or ____

The intervening act will then be deemed to be the actual,____ of the victim’s death

A

coincidence
unforeseeable

proximate cause

26
Q

Here, ___ the D’s unlawful act of shooting the friend, there would have been no need to attempt to rush Friend to hospital, during which attempt Friend was further injured

A

but for

27
Q

It is also ______that one would get into an accident while rushing another to the hospital for life saving care

A

foreseeable

28
Q

The accident did nto appear to occur in an_____ manner

A

unusual

29
Q

the D’s act was the but-for and the ____ cause of the friend’s death

A

proximate

30
Q

voluntary manslaughter is the intentional killing of a human being without ________ committed in the _____ of passion due to _____

A

malice aforethought
heat
adequate provocation

31
Q

involuntary manslaughter is when the D causes the death of another human being by engaging in conduct that creates an ________ risk of death or serious bodily injury

the MAJORITY view is that the D must have acted “ “. The minority view is some states “ “ is enough

A

unreasonably

recklessly

gross negligence

32
Q

To prove attempt, the prosecution must prove TWO element
(1) the D _____ to commit the crime, and (2) the D’s acts went sufficiently beyond _______ to commit the crime

Common law = “dangerously close” to the crime (CDC), whereas MPC requires that D’s conduct be a “____”

In most states, abandonment is NOT a defense

A

intended
mere preparation

substantial step (MPC - SS)