Measurement Errors and Measurement Uncertainties Flashcards
what is a random error
- an error caused by unpredictable changes in conditions
- such as temperature or pressure
- or in a difference in recording that is accurate to get exactly right
what is a systematic error
- an error caused by the apparatus
- which leads to the recorded value being either too high or low
a volume of gas is collected in a syringe and measured in different experiments done on the same day. what random error could occur here
- the temperature or atmospheric pressure of the lab may vary during the day
- this will cause an unpredictable change in the value recorded
why does repeating an experiment lead to a more accurate final value
because these random fluctuations in conditions are less important when values are averaged
what is an example of a systematic error occurring with a thermometer
- the thermometer might have more liquid in it than it should have
- causing the height of the liquid at all temperatures to be higher than it should be
- meaning the recorded temp will always be higher than the correct temp
will repeating experiments where you have a systematic error make any difference and why
- no
- because the problem is with the equipment itself
- you can repeat it as many times as you want, but if the instrument in which you are recording your values isnt accurate
- you will always have an incorrect answer
when recording the meniscus of a liquid at eye level, how would random and systematic errors arise
- the random error would be small variations from the horizontal when measuring at eye level
- the systematic error could be consistently reading the meniscus from above or the wrong angle
- so no matter how accurate or precise even the instruments are, you will always get an inaccurate answer
what is the inherent potential error of any apparatus called
their measurement uncertainty
what is the size of the measurement uncertainty determined by
the precision of the apparatus
if a balance that uses three decimal places is more precise than one that uses one decimal place, how do their measurement uncertainties compare
the balance with three decimal places has a lower measurement uncertainty than the one decimal balance
if the measurement uncertainty of the one decimal place balance is 0.05g and for the three decimal place its 0.0005g, and they were both used to measure 10g of a substance, how would you mathematically show that the three decimal place balance is more accurate
- by calculating their percentage uncertainties
- (0.05 / 10) x 100 = 0.5% uncertainty
- (0.0005 / 10) x 100 = 0.005% uncertainty
- the 3dp one has a percentage U of 0.005% whereas the other one has one of 0.5%
if the one decimal place balance can read to one decimal place, why is the uncertainty said to be +-0.05g
- because it can measure the mass to be a little too high or a little too low due to rounding up or down
- so its range of 0.1 that it can measure it split into two
- meaning it can read the mass to be 0.05 too high or 0.05 too low
what could a reading of 17.1g be between for that balance
17.05 and 17.15g
if the measurement uncertainty of a 50cm^3 burette is 0.05cm^3, what would the uncertainty be when it is practically used and why
- it would be 0.1cm^3
- because you are reading the burette twice
- from the initial value to the final reading
- because you do it twice you double the uncertainty