Mazur Chapter 9: Stimulus Control & Concept Learning Flashcards
Probe Trials
Stimuli are presented to measure the responding but no reinforcer is given
Method of measuring generalization gradients
What causes generalization gradients?
Pavlov
Innate
Generalization is an automatic byproduct of the conditioning process
Conditioning somehow spreads across to nearby neurons in the cerebral cortex
What causes generalization gradients?
Lashely and Wade
Learned through experience
Explicit discrimination training along the dimension in question is necessary before the typical peaked generalization gradient is obtained
e.g. person needs to be reinforced when a certain color is delivered but not when it is absent
Without discrimination the individual would respond just as strongly to all colors
nondifferential training
Every trial is the same
Produces a flat generalization gradient
e.g. same response rate for all frequencies
presence-absence training
Produces typical generalization gradients
Intradimensional training
same stimulus (e.g. tone) just different dimension ( e.g. tone frequency)
Produces narrower generalization gradients
e.g.frequency is only reliable cue.
Sensory deprivation and generalization
Sensory deprivation can sometimes produce peaked generalization gradients even when animals have no
prior experience with a particular stimulus dimension
In other words, experience may not always be necessary to obtain
Simultaneous discrimination procedure
Present two stimuli together (a dark gray card & a medium gray card) and the animal/human must choose between them
Differences in opinion if learning is absolute or relational [refer to other flashcards]
absolute theory of stimulus control
animal has learned about the 2 stimuli separately
e.g. the medium gray gives me food, but the dark gray does not
Relational theory of stimulus control
animal learned about the relationship b/w the 2 stimuli
it knows that the lighter gray card is associated with food
Transposition
transfer of the relational rule
e.g. if medium gray (which before predicted reinforcer) and lighter gray are presented→ they chose the lighter gray
they realized that the lighter gray always gets the food
Peak Shift
Shift in the generalization gradient in a direction away from the S-
Spence’s Theory of Excitatory & Inhibitory Gradients
Accounts for both transposition & peak shift
In intradimensional training
excitatory generalization gradient develops around the S+ inhibitory generalization gradient develops around the S-
Spence’s theory does not do a good job predicting the results on a test called intermediate size problem
Some situations respond to the absolute properties of stimuli, however, considerable evidence points to and favors the relational approach to stimulus control
Spence: associative strength
The ability of each stimulus to elicit a response
Spence: net associative strength
Determined by subtracting a stimulus’ inhibitory strength from its excitatory strength