Mazur Chapter 8: Theories and Research on Operant Conditioning Flashcards
Tolman v Thorndike
Thorndike thought that the performance of the response was necessary for it to be learned
Tolman challenged this with his rats and cognitive map
We now agree with Tolman as learning can occur without the opportunity to practice the operant response
Thorndike’s idea can also be challenged by latent learning
Tolman: Latent Learning
Reinforcement is not necessary for the learning of a new response
However, it is necessary for the performance of that response
Reinforcer does help
The Role of the Reinforcer
Thorndike and Hull:
- reinforcer is more of a catalyst
- it strengthens an S-R association
- but the reinforcer itself is not included in that association
Tolmam:
- reinforcer stimulates associative
- reinforcer also becomes a part of the associative network
- animal “develops an expectation” of the reinforcer
two-factor theory
classical and operant conditioning are 2 different types of learning.
one-factor theory
reinforcement and punishment can apply to all types of learning, including the responses of an individual’s glands, organs, and smooth muscles
N.E. Miller and two-factor theory
Experiment involved electric stimulation of the brain (ESB)
Reinforcement could control many visceral responses besides heart rate
It seems that reinforcement can exert direct control over some visceral responses when the activity of the skeletal muscles has been eliminated, but this control is not as easy to obtain as the early studies seem to suggest
Biofeedback
Any procedure designed to supply the individual with amplified feedback about some bodily process
The reasoning is that improved feedback may be accompanied by the possibility of better control.
biofeedback using EEG = neurofeedback
Circular Definition of Reinforcement
A stimulus is called a reinforcer because it increases some behavior…
A stimulus is said to increase the behavior because it is a reinforcer
This simple definition of a reinforcer makes no specific predictions whatsoever
This can be solved though by finding a rule that predicts what can be a reinforcer. Some theories are:
Need reduction
Drive reduction
Trans-situationality
Premack’s principle
Response Deprivation Theory
Functional analysis of behaviors and reinforcers
Need Reduction [Hull]
All primary reinforcers are stimuli that reduce some biological need and that all stimuli that reduce a biological need will act as reinforcers
• Ex: food, water, warmth, and avoidance of pain
Drive Reduction [Hull and Miller]
Strong stimulation of any sort is aversive to an organism and any reduction in this stimulation acts as a reinforcer for the immediately preceding behavior.
e.g. hunger and sex drives
Problems with Need Reduction Theory
There are reinforcers that satisfy no biological needs
There are examples of biological necessities for which there is no corresponding reinforcer
Problems with Drive Reduction Theory
Not all reductions in stimulations act as reinforcers
There are too many examples of reinforcers that either produce no decrease in stimulation or actually produce an increase in stimulation
e.g. reinforcers such as music, sports, etc
Trans-situationality
A stimulus that is determined to be a reinforcer in one situation will also be a reinforcer in other situations
• If saccharin is a reinforcer once, we suspect it will always be so
Principle works quite well in many cases
e.g. food, water, escape from pain can be used as reinforcers for many different behaviors
However, there are some cases in which a reinforcer does not work across situations
Premack’s principle
More probable behaviors will reinforce less probable behaviors
Premack’s principle is a.k.a. as the principle of reinforcement relativity.
Basicallay, Premack believed that thereinforcement procedure should be viewed as a contingency between behaviors rather than as a contingency between a behavior and a stimulus.
e.g. rats: level pressing and eating
eating can occur if and only if a lever press occurs
If this is the case then some behaviors are reinforceable behaviors (lever pressing) and others are reinforcing behaviors (eating)
There are no absolute categories of reinforces and reinforceable responses, and which role a behavior plays depends on its relative location on the probability scale.
Premack’s principle and punishment
Less probable behaviors will punish more probable behaviors.
One way to accomplish this is through reciprocal contingency