Marshall Flashcards

1
Q

Claims portfolio

A

= aggregate portfolio for which risk margins must be estimated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

valuation classes

A

portfolios are considered individually as part of risk margin analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

claim group

A

group of claims with common risk characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

sources of uncertainty: 2 sources

A
  1. systematic risk
  2. independent risk
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

systematic risk and 2 types

A

Systemic risk = risks that are common across valuation classes or claims groups

  • internal
  • external
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

independent risk and 2 types

A

Independent risk = risk that occur due to randomness inherent in insurance process

  • parameter risk = extent to which randomness associated with insurance process affects ability to select appropriate parameters
  • process risk = pure effect of randomness associated with insurance process
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

internal systematic risk definition and 3 sources

A

internal = risks internal to liability valuation/modeling process

  1. Specification error
  2. parameter selection error
  3. data error
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Specification error

A

Specification error = arises b/c model cannot perfectly model insurance process

Umbrella claims are more variable due to longer tail and high attachment point

Potential risk indicator = number of models run

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Parameter selection error

A

Parameter selection error = arises b/c model cannot adequately measure all predictors of future claim costs or trends in these predictors

Severity trend have larger impacts on excess layers

Risk indicator = predictors stable over time?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Data error

A

Data error = arises due to lack of credible data and inadequate knowledge of portfolio being analyzed

Risk indicator = data timely, reliable, and consistent?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

external systematic risk definition and 7 sources

A

external = risks external to valuation/modeling process

  1. economic and social
  2. legislative political, & claims inflation
  3. claims management process change
  4. expense
  5. event
  6. latent
  7. recovery
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Economic and social risk

A

uncertainty associated with inflation, social trends, etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Legislative, political, & claims inflation risk

A

uncertainty associated with changes in political landscape, shifts/trends in level of settlement etc

WC benefit levels

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Claims management process change risk

A

uncertainty associated with changes in claim reporting, payment, estimation, etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

expense risk

A

uncertainty associated with cost of managing runoff or maintaining unexpired risk until date of loss

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

event risk

A

uncertainty associated with claim costs arising from events, natural or man made

Property for CATs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Latent claims risk

A

uncertainty associated with claims that arise from sources that are not currently covered (asbestos)

WC for asbestos

18
Q

recovery risk

A

uncertainty associated with recoveries either reinsurance or non-reins

-risks will typically be included in central estimate valuation so best to analyze in conjunction with central estimate valuation

19
Q

correlation effects

A

Independent risk: assumed to be uncorrelated with any other source of uncertainty either within valuation class or btw classes

Internal: assumed to be uncorr with ind risk and each source of external, but internal tends to be correlated btw VCsand between OCLs and PLs

External: assume each risk category is uncorrelated with independent and internal, but correlations may exist between risks that belong to similar risk categories or may be correlations for common risk course across multiple classes like event risk for different LOBs

20
Q

why is internal systemic risks tend to be correlated?

A

between VCs: same actuary effect and template models/similar models used across valuation classes

between OCLs and PLs: linkage between PL and OCL methodologies

21
Q

risk margin: normal distribution

A

risk margin = Z*CoV

normal produces higher risk margin at lower probability of reserve adequacy

22
Q

risk margin: lognormal distribution

A

risk margin = exp(u+Z*σ)/sum(weights)-1

CoVs inform calculation of u and σ

lognormal distribution produces higher risk margin at higher probability of reserve adequacy

23
Q

risk margins can be converted into dollars

A

by multiplying them by central estimates

24
Q

if no correlation, CoV

A

CoV = sqrt(Σ(wi*CoVi)2)/Σwi

used by independent risk

25
Q

if correlation, CoV

A

need to incorporate 2*row*w1*w2*CoV1*CoV2 in formula for each pair that has correlation

*internal systemic risk uses this

26
Q

CoV formula for external risks

A

CoV^2=ΣCoV(i)^2

assuming independence for external sources of risk

27
Q

CoVs should be subjected to

A

internal checks

28
Q

For each source of uncertainty, CoVs should be compared

A
  • btw VCs for OCLs, PLs, and total insurance liability
  • comparison should be made between OCLs and PLs within classes
29
Q

For independent risk, internal benchmarking for 2 main dimensions

A
  • portfolio size: larger portfolio, lower volatility arising from random effects
  • length of claim run-off: longer run-off, more time there is for random effects to have an impact
30
Q

2 dimensions for internal benchmarking for independent risks has implications for CoV selections

A
  • OCL CoVs for short-tailed < similar sized long-tailed
  • OCL CoVs for short-tailed < smaller long-tailed
  • PL CoVs for long-tailed > OCL for same portfolio due to law of large numbers

PLs should be smaller resulting in more volatility

Difference should be larger for small portfolios with higher independent risk components

-PL CoVs for short-tailed < OCL for same portfolio due to law of large numbers

PLs will be larger since most of OCLs will have already closed -> less volatility for PLs

31
Q

for internal systemic risk using internal benchmarking, CoVs patterns/rules

A
  • classes with homogeneous claim groups should have similar CoVs
  • long-tailed portfolios should have higher than short-tailed since long-tailed tend to be more complicated
32
Q

for external systemic risk using internal benchmarking, CoVs patterns

A
  • long-tailed should have higher than short-tailed in most cases
  • exceptions = event risk and liability risk for home classes
33
Q

claims portfolio should be split into valuation classes

A
  • choice of classes must ensure that classes grouped together are homogenous and in line with central estimate valuation
  • to reduce risk (of selection in parameters, etc.), they must have similar characteristics (ex. development pattern) and must be sufficiently large datasets to ensure reasonable credibility
  • approach should balance practical benefits gained from higher level allocation with insight gained from more granular allocation
  • once divided into VC, must determine whether or not specific classes should be divided further into claims group
34
Q

Questions to ask management for segmentation of portfolio

A

-CAT event in any geo location?

CATs have diff development patterns than normal loss -> model CAT losses separately

-are coverages the same in all locations?

Diff coverages have diff development patterns

-are there differences in regulation for locations?

Development patterns may differ due to diff in regulation

35
Q

balance scorecard: reasonableness/general rules

A
  • minimum CoV for best practice shouldn’t be much below 5% because even a perfect model won’t be able to completely represent the true underlying process
  • comparing LOBs: the LOB with a longer tail should have a higher CoV at each score due to difficulty in modeling long tailed LOBs
  • scale should not be linear because marginal improvements will have diminishing returns
36
Q

calculate internal systemic risk CoV when you have balance scorecard

A

score(LOBi)=Σ(scorei*wi)/Σwi

look up scores on the CoV scale

37
Q

important to do sensitivity testing for risk margin calculation

A

risk margin has many underlying assumptions

need to understand which assumptions impact final risk margin the most

38
Q

single model with limited data that scored poorly against compared to best practice could have internal systemic risk CoV

A

> 20%

39
Q

internal systemic risk: quantitative modeling techniques

A

quantitative modeling could be used to inform the approach but balances scorecard process to assess risk indicators should be used

40
Q

external systemic risk: quantitative modeling techniques

A

quantitative modeling can analyze past episodes of external systemic risk, but cannot adequately capture potential future external systemic risks to extent they’re different than the past

41
Q

independent risk: quantitative modeling techniques

A

stochastic modeling techniques such as Mack method, Bootstrapping, or Bayesian techniques are appropriate to assess independent risk

42
Q

why when assessing risk margins shouldn’t directly use quantitative methods to select correlations between valuations classes for sources of risk

A

quantitative methods to estimate correlations are technically complex and require lots of data

correlations would be heavily influences by past events and may not be appropriate for future

would be difficule or impossible to break out correlations to different risk sources

therefore, should use judgement to select correlation coefficients to assess risk margins