Malpresentation Flashcards
What is malpresentation?
Any non-vertex presentation. This may be of the face, brow, breech or some other part of the body if the lie is oblique or transverse
The lie refers to the long axis of the fetus in relation to the long axis of the uterus. The lie may be longitudinal, transverse or oblique. The presentation is that part of the fetus that is at the pelvic brim, in other words, the part of the fetus presenting to the pelvic inlet.
What is malposition?
When the head, coming vertex first, does not rotate to OA, presenting instead as persistent occipitotransverse or occipitoposterior (OP).
The position of the fetus refers to the way in which the presenting part is positioned in relation to the maternal pelvis.
Types of malpresentations
-Face
-Brow= wide diameter at pelvic inlet
-Breech
Signs and symptoms of malpresentation
-Fetus moulding, caput
Describe face presentation
-1 : 500 births
-Fetal head extends right back (hyperextended so that the occiput touches the fetal back)
-Associated with prematurity, tumours of the fetal neck, loops of cord around the fetal neck, fetal macrosomia and anencephaly
-Recognised only after the onset of labour and, if the face is swollen it is easy to confuse this presentation with that of a breech.
-The position of the face is described with reference to the chin, using the prefix ‘mento’. The presenting diameter is submentobregmatic (9.5cm)
-The face usually enters the pelvis with the chin in the transverse position (mentotransverse) and 90% rotates to mentoanterior so that the head is born with flexion
-If mentoposterior, the extending head presents an increasingly wider diameter to the pelvis, leading to worsening relative CPD and impacted obstruction
-A caesarean birth is usually required.
Describe brow presentation
-1 : 700 and 1 : 1500 births
-Least favourable for delivery
-The presenting diameter is mentovertical, measuring 14 cm.
-The supraorbital ridges and the bridge of the nose will be palpable on vaginal examination.
-The head may flex to become a vertex presentation or extend to a face presentation in early labour.
-If the brow presentation persists, a caesarean birth will be required
Epidemiology of breech presentation
-Fetus presenting bottom first (caudal end of fetus occupies lower segment)
-incidence is around 40% at 20 weeks, 25% at 32 weeks and only 3% to 4% at term.
-The chance of a breech presentation turning spontaneously after 38 weeks is less than 4%.
-At term, 65% of breech presentations are frank (hips flexed, knees full extended), with the remainder being flexed or footling (one or both feet come first with bottom at higher position)
=Footling breech carries a 5% to 20% risk of cord prolapse (higher perinatal morbidity)
Risk factors/causes for breech presentation
-Idiopathic
-15% underlying factors affecting fetal motility or the vertical polarity of the uterine cavity:
=Multiple pregnancy
=Bicornuate uterus and uterine malformations (septate, didelphys)
=Fibroids
=Placenta praevia (prevents presenting part from engaging)
=Polyhydramnios (unstable lie, unable to engage) and oligohydramnios (unable to turn to vertex)
=Prematurity (due to increased incidence earlier in gestation)
=It may also rarely be associated with fetal anomaly, particularly neural tube defects
=Neuromuscular disorders (hypotonia of fetus)
=Autosomal trisomy.
Types of breech
-Complete breech, where the legs are fully flexed at the hips and knees (tuck)
-Incomplete breech, with one leg flexed at the hip and extended at the knee
-Extended breech, also known as frank breech, with both legs flexed at the hip and extended at the knee (pike)
-Footling breech, with a foot is presenting through the cervix with the leg extended
Mode of delivery for breech presentation
-External Cephalic Version (vaginal breech delivery with baby turned prior to the onset of labour
-Caesarean
-Vaginal
-Assisted vaginal
Describe ECV (external cephalic version)
-All women with a breech presentation at term should be offered ECV unless there is an absolute contraindication
-It is good practice to offer ECV from 36 weeks in nulliparous women and from 37 weeks in multiparous women.
-The success rate is approximately 50%
Absolute contraindications to ECV
-When caesarean delivery is required regardless of presentation (e.g., placenta praevia)
-Antepartum haemorrhage within the last 7 days
-Abnormal cardiotocograph
-Major uterine anomaly
-Ruptured membranes
-Multiple pregnancy (except delivery of second twin)
-Absence of maternal consent
Relative contraindications where ECV might be more complicated
-Nuchal cord
-Fetal growth restriction
-Proteinuric pre-eclampsia
-Oligohydramnios
-Major fetal anomalies
-Hyperextended fetal head
-Morbid maternal obesity
Procedure of ECV
-CTG, USS (potentially fasted and prepared for theatre in case of fetal distress)
-Most likely to be successful in parous women when the presenting part is free, the liquor volume is normal, the head is easy to palpate, and the uterus feels soft.
-A flexed breech is more likely to turn than an extended (frank) breech.
-Lie flat with a 30-degree lateral tilt.
-Betamimetic drug, to soften the uterus is associated with an increased success rate.
-Applying scanning gel to the abdomen allows easier manipulation and permits scanning during the procedure if required.
-The breech is disengaged if necessary, with the scan probe or hands.
-Then, attempts are made to rotate in the direction in which the baby is facing (i.e., ‘forward roll’).
=The fetal heart rate should be checked throughout the procedure.
-If a forward roll is unsuccessful, a backward ‘somersault’ can be tried.
-If the procedure is only partially successful (i.e., the fetus is converted to a transverse lie), the fetus should be returned to breech rather than leave it transverse.
-A CTG should be performed after the procedure is completed.
-Women who are rhesus D negative should undergo testing for fetomaternal haemorrhage and anti-D immunoglobulin should be offered.
Caesarean section for breech presentation
-Planned caesarean section at term for breech presentation is associated with a small reduction in perinatal mortality compared with a planned vaginal birth.
-However, the decision to perform a caesarean section has important implications for future pregnancies, such as the risks of opting for vaginal birth after caesarean section, increased risk of complications in future caesarean sections and the risk of an abnormally invasive placenta