main ideas of realism Flashcards
Who are the most important actors in the global system, according to realists?
states
How does selfish human nature lead to selfish states?
- people will pursue their own interests above others
- states seek to promote their national interest
- states act selfishly when there is uncertainty about other states intentions
What is the Prisoners’ Dilemma?
- Two members of a criminal gang, A and B are arrested
- The police question them separately and offer them both a Faustian bargain
~ if A and B both betray, they serve 5 years
~ if A denies but B betrays, B gets no time and A gets 20 years (vice-versa)
~ if A and B both deny, they serve three months
How does the Prisoners’ Dilemma link to selfish human nature and selfish states?
- states cannot trust other states
- the safest strategy is to expect betrayal, and pre-empt it by betraying first
- states don’t know each others intentions and have no means of guaranteeing cooperation
- not working together becomes the best strategy
- competition is inevitable and leads to a clash of interests -> war
How are states rational?
- engage in dispassionate calculations of their interests
- relations with other states are determined by the relative value of the costs versus the benefits
How are states unitary actors?
- no division of opinion within the state as to what constitutes its interests
- some realists believe culture and the nature of regime of a state may affect its interests
- others think interests are fixed, as the main interests are always increasing power and security
How are states amoral?
- they don’t act according to concepts of justice,rights or religious morality
- states only act according to their own interests
How do states seek power?
- motivated by the pursuit of the national interest (realists think this is power)
- realists argue the safest thing for a state to do is become hegemon (dominant power)
- must compete with each other in a zero-sum game
- states naturally seek a balance of power to curb the hegemonic ambitions of more powerful states to avoid conflicts
International anarchy and its implications according to realists
- states are the principal actors in international systems = no higher authority
- states cannot be held accountable for their actions
- some realists claim that selfish human nature causes states to act selfishly = leads to conflict, other realists believe that the anarchy is allowing states to get away with acting selfishly
How is the international system like Hobbes state of nature?
- as states can act with impunity
- states in the world are like individuals in the state of nature, they are no subject to higher authority and as they are ruled by human beings they act selfishly
What is Hobbes State of Nature?
- a device used in political philosophy to imagine what life might have been like for people before the establishment of society + government
- individuals are self-governing autonomous actors
- no rules and nobody in a position to enforce them
- individuals free to do as they will
- according to hobbes, life is ‘nasty,brutish and short’
Why do realists think war is inevitable?
- in a world where people and states are selfish, there is bound to be disagreement and competition for resources
- lack of adherence to moral principles and the pursuit of power is bound to lead to misunderstandings and disharmony between states
- limited power in the world means all states pose a threat
~ Randall Schweller, even if there is not war, there is ‘always the danger of war lurking in the background’
What is a security dilemma?
- the actions that one state takes to increase its security causing other states to follow suit = increases the likelihood of conflict even if its not desired
- e.g Ukraine wanting to join NATO, but Russia can’t invade if they do as they will lose against NATO
How did the recognition of the security dilemma lead to a refinement of realist theory?
- Kenneth Waltz argued that states become obsessed with security because of the anarchy in the international system
- a states action to increase its own security decreases other states security = leads to ‘bandwagoning’/arms race
What is an example of states cooperating to escape the security dilemma?
Cuban Missile Crisis