macro hot topics 2 Flashcards
unemployment
- cyclical unemployment rate of 4.2%
- comes from a dodgy LFS survey with only 15000 participants, usually 100000 people take part so not reliable measuremtn, thought to be higher
- economic inactivity 22.2% much higher after covid due to rise in long term sickness and people havent returned to Lf after covid if in 50/60. potentail growth reduces and labour shortages
- youth unemployment: (16-24) 11% and very weak consumer confidence
- firms struggling to get workers so workers have bargained and now 5.6% in wage growth
- in real terms, wage growth has gone up as inflation is 3.2%
costs of unemployment
- lost output (operating inside PPF curve) due to unemployed labour in the economy. Consumers get fewer goods and services so LS lower and growth is limied
- Less incomes tax rev, less VAT tax revenue due to less spending and less corp tax and biz profits fall. Gov spending rises due to automatic stabiliser so budget deficit and national debt rises and finances rise
- so maybe future cuts to spending/contractionary policies recover this, or borrowing? opp cost of debt interest
- poverty, crime, protests, mental health issues that burdens gov finance
- other contunries suffer as demand fro their exports fall
- incomes lost as they fall in to relative poverty, cuasing more social costs. More borrowing to cover costsfuelling bankruptcy
- HYSTERESIS - WHEN UNEMPLOYEMNT BECOMES LONG TERM CAUSING DECLINE IN THEIR SKILLS AND THEIR SKILLS BECOME OUTDATED, POSSIBLY OUTCOMPETED BY NEW ENTRANTS. This means they must rely on benefits so limited spending constraining aggregate demand so growth limited
- hysteresis - eventually become discouraged inactivity workers. Reduces size of Labour force so LRAS and long term growth rates decline
Pros of unemployment
- greater pool of workers for firms to choose from, choose most productivr workers so lowest unit costs
- low inflation as huge excess supply of labour reduces workers wage bargaining power so costs of production remain low as wage growth is limited and consumer prices remain lwo, inflation controlled
- ## improved Current account position as imports fall due to reduced icnomes and reduce spending power so deficit reduced
evaluate the consequences of unemployment
are costs bigger than benefits or vice versa
- unemployment at the natural rate is fine and benefits bigger here
- duration; long term rates of une,lpyment (year or more) is bad as hysteresis is highly likelu
- type is crucial; structrual is deadly, caused by occupational immobility which is so hard to fix only with SSPs but big time lag. But cyclical isn’t bad as recession dont last forever same for frictional
- distribution of unemployment; youth unemployment is very bad bc they are more liable to suffer long term unemlpoymet so easy for them to be outcompeted and lose skills as they dont have any skills to start with, hysteresis
What is natural unemlpoyment
unemlpoyment which occurs when labour market is at equilibrium, consisting of structual, frictional and seasonal unemployment
outline a few policies to reduce unemployment
- Fiscal stimulus, such as tax cuts or increased government spending, to boost demand and create jobs.
- Monetary policy, such as lowering interest rates, to encourage businesses to invest and create jobs.
- Education and training programs to improve the skills of the workforce and make them more employable.
- labour market reforms to make it easier for businesses to hire and fire employees and to encourage flexibility in the labor market.
Pros and cons of policy to reduce cyclical unemployment
-
Distinction between unemployment and under-employment
- Unemployment refers to individuals who are not currently employed but are actively seeking and available for work.
- under-employment occurs when individuals are employed but their job does not fully utilize their skills and qualifications. This can result in part-time work, low wages, or jobs below their skill level.
What is frictional unemployment
Frictional unemployment: This is short-term unemployment caused by people transitioning between jobs, moving to a new location, or re-entering the workforce after a break
How many more economically inactive due to long term sickness compared to before the pandemic
700 000
- rise in long term sickness among younger people as well, adding to youth unemployment
- most prevalent health condition among those econ inactive due to LT sickness was depression, bad nerves or anxiety
- gov using immigration to fill some shortages
What measures did the government announce to reduce inactivity rates
- sanctions used to ensure get people to work if they can. Aimed to help 1.1mn people w long term health conditons, disabilities or unemployment to stay in work
- Benefit claimants who fail to find work for more than 18 months will have to undertake work experience placements. Benefits removed if you refuse to take part
- the number “inactive” due to long-term sickness or disability had risen by almost half a million since the pandemic to a record 2.6 million
- Digital tools will also be used to “track” attendance at job fairs and interviews under the tougher sanctions regime.
- returnerships: 3 programmes aimed at getting older people back to work e.g apprenticeships, skills bootcamps and sector based work academy programmes
- Introducing a claimant review point – Universal Credit claimants who are still unemployed after the 12-month Restart programme will take part in a claimant review point: a new process whereby a work coach will decide what further work search conditions or employment pathways would best support a claimant into work
eval: these sanctions will only worsen mental health amd issue deepens;
How to reduce cyclical unemployment
- expansionary fiscal/monetary policy (increase spending, reduce taxes, lower IR)
- eval: conflict of objectives (inflation), gov finances, consumer/business confidence, time lags (lras diagram)
How to reduce real wage unemployment
- reduce min wage
- reduce the strength of trade unions
- eval: impact on workers, income inequality
How to reduce frictional unemployment
- interventionist SSPs: better of more resources for job centres, subsidies to private job agencies, G on infrastructure
- market based SSPs: reduce benefits
eval: no guarantee, cost, time lags, stakeholder impact
How to reduce structural unemployment
Interventionist
- g on education/training (occ imm)
- subsidies for in work training (occ imm)
- Go on infrastructure (geo imm)
- grants or low cost housing (geo imm)
Markey based SSPs
- reduce benefits (occ and geo imm)
- deregulate hiring/firing laws (occ imm)