Mack (1994) - CL assumptions Flashcards
Implicit CL assumptions (3)
Mack
- linearity - future loss proportional to claims to date»_space; means that development factors are uncorrelated
- independence - AYs are independent
- variance - variance of next loss is a function of age and losses to date
Mack’s assumptions apply to cumulative losses
Variance of next loss
variance of next cumulative loss = claims to date * alpha-subk^2
MSE of ultimate claims
MSE (ultimate claims) = ultimate^2 * sum [ (alpha-k^2 / age-to-age factor^2) * (1 / est. prior cumulative losses + 1 / sum(prior cum claims for all prior AYs x lates diagonal) ) ]
Alpha-k^2 formula and what it represents
alpha-k^2 = (1 / (I - k - 1)) * sum down col (current claims * (actual age-to-age - expected age-to-age)^2 )
represents variability in age-to-age factors
Estimators for last alpha parameter (3)
- = 0 - only reasonable if development expected to be finished by end of triangle
- extrapolate the alpha series using loglinear regression
- assume the same relative change in subsequent alphas, alpha-I-1^2 = min( alpha-I-2^4 / alpha-I-3^2, min( alpha-I-3^2, alpha-I-2^2 ))
95% confidence interval for reserves under a normal distribution
(R-hat - 2 * s.e.(R-hat) , R-hat + 2 * s.e.(R-hat))
Problems with assuming reserves are normally distributed (2)
- poor distribution if data is skewed
- potential for a negative lower bound even if negative reserves are not possible (lognormal distribution corrects this)
Lognormal confidence interval for reserves (and lognormal parameters)
exp( mu +/- t * sigma)
mu = ln(R-hat) - sigma^2 / 2
sigma^2 = ln( 1+ (s.e.(R-hat)^2 / R-hat^2) )
Alternate variance assumptions and corresponding variance proportionality implications (3)
- claims to date^2 weighting - age-to-age factor = sum( current claims * claims in next period ) / sum( current claims^2 )
»_space; variance proportional to 1 - normal volume weighted avg
» variance proportional to claims to date - simple average - age-to-age factor = (1 / (I - k)) * sum (claims in next period / current claims)
» variance proportional to claims-to-date^2
Test for linearity assumption
Mack
plot claims in next period against claims to date and look for a straight line through the origin
Test for variance assumption
Mack
plot weighted residuals against claims to date and look for a random scatter
weighted residual = (actual claims in next period - fitted claims in next period) / sqrt(variance proportionality assumption)
Weaknesses of the CL method (2)
Mack
- age-to-age factors further out in the tail rely on very few observations
- known claims in latest AY form an uncertain basis for projecting to ultimate
Test for correlation between development factors
Mack
table of r’s and s’s:
use global test statistic to create a 50% confidence interval around T
» reject if T not in CI: (E[T] - .67 * sqrt(var(T)) , E[T] + .67 * sqrt(var(T)) )
Correlation coefficient (T) for a pair of columns and global statistic (Mack)
T-k = 1 - 6 * { sum(squared diff b/w r and s) / [ (I - k)^3 - I + k ] }
T = (I - k - 1) weighted average of T-k’s
E[T] and Var(T) formulas for correlation coefficient b/w development factors
(Mack)
E[T] = 0
Var(T) = 1 / [ (I - 2) * (I - 3) / 2]